Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada; Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada; Department of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada.
Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):325-34. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.020. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
Limited data exist on the impact of the site of metastases on survival in patients with stage IV prostate cancer (PCa).
To investigate the role of metastatic phenotype at presentation on mortality in stage IV PCa.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Overall, 3857 patients presenting with metastatic PCa between 1991 and 2009, included in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database were evaluated.
Overall and cancer-specific survival rates were estimated in the overall population and after stratifying patients according to the metastatic site (lymph node [LN] alone, bone, visceral, or bone plus visceral). Multivariable Cox regression analyses tested the relationship between the site of metastases and survival. All analyses were repeated in a subcohort of patients with a single metastatic site involved.
Respectively, 2.8%, 80.2%, 6.1%, and 10.9% of patients presented with LN, bone, visceral, and bone plus visceral metastases at diagnosis. Respective median overall survival and cancer-specific survival were 43 mo and 61 mo for LN metastases, 24 mo and 32 mo for bone metastases, 16 mo and 26 mo for visceral metastases, and 14 mo and 19 mo for bone plus visceral metastases (p<0.001). In multivariable analyses, patients with visceral metastases had a significantly higher risk of overall and cancer-specific mortality versus those with exclusively LN metastases (p<0.001). The unfavorable impact of visceral metastases persisted in the oligometastatic subgroup. Our study is limited by its retrospective design.
Visceral involvement represents a negative prognostic factor and should be considered as a proxy of more aggressive disease in patients presenting with metastatic PCa. This parameter might indicate the need for additional systemic therapies in these individuals.
Patients with visceral metastases should be considered as affected by more aggressive disease and might benefit from the inclusion in clinical trials evaluating novel molecules.
关于转移性前列腺癌(PCa)患者的转移部位对生存的影响,相关数据有限。
研究初诊时转移性表型对 IV 期 PCa 患者死亡率的作用。
设计、设置和参与者:总体而言,评估了 1991 年至 2009 年间纳入 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare 数据库的 3857 例转移性 PCa 患者。
在总体人群中评估了总体生存率和癌症特异性生存率,并根据转移部位(仅淋巴结 [LN]、骨、内脏或骨加内脏)对患者进行分层。多变量 Cox 回归分析检验了转移部位与生存之间的关系。所有分析均在涉及单一转移部位的患者亚组中重复进行。
分别有 2.8%、80.2%、6.1%和 10.9%的患者在初诊时出现 LN、骨、内脏和骨加内脏转移。相应的中位总生存和癌症特异性生存分别为 LN 转移患者 43 个月和 61 个月、骨转移患者 24 个月和 32 个月、内脏转移患者 16 个月和 26 个月、骨加内脏转移患者 14 个月和 19 个月(p<0.001)。在多变量分析中,与仅 LN 转移患者相比,内脏转移患者的总生存和癌症特异性死亡风险显著更高(p<0.001)。在寡转移亚组中,内脏转移的不利影响仍然存在。本研究的局限性在于其回顾性设计。
内脏受累代表预后不良的因素,在患有转移性 PCa 的患者中,应将其视为侵袭性更强的疾病的代表。这一参数可能表明需要对这些患者进行额外的全身治疗。
内脏转移患者应被视为侵袭性更强的疾病,并可能受益于纳入评估新型分子的临床试验。