• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于五个欧洲国家住院患者抗生素使用的观点和经验:一项定性描述性研究。

Views and experiences with regard to antibiotic use of hospitalized patients in five European countries: a qualitative descriptive study.

机构信息

Infection Control Programme, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.

Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Scientific Centre for Quality of Healthcare, IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Faculty of Medicine, Research Group of Immunology and Biochemistry, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Feb;25(2):249.e7-249.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.04.030. Epub 2018 May 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2018.04.030
PMID:29777924
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore inpatients experiences and views with regard to antibiotics in five European hospitals.

METHODS

Qualitative study where a patient-centred framework was used to explore inpatients' experiences concerning antibiotic treatment. A purposeful sample of inpatients treated with antibiotics in five hospitals participated in interviews (all centres) and focus groups (Switzerland only).

RESULTS

A total of 31 interviews (five in Belgium, ten in Croatia, nine in France, five in the Netherlands and two in Switzerland) and three focus groups (in Switzerland, 11 participants) were performed. The median age of participants was 61 years (range 33-86 years). The following main themes emerged: (a) patients trust doctors to take the best decisions for them even though communication concerning different antibiotic-related aspects is often insufficient, (b) patients feel that doctors do not prioritize communication due to time constraints and do not seem to adapt information based on patients' preferences, (c) patients differ in their wish to be informed but overall want to be informed on the main aspects in an understandable way, (d) patients often find reassurance in sharing information about their antibiotic treatment with close family, (e) professionals should explore patients' preferences to be involved or not in shared decision making for antibiotic treatment.

CONCLUSION

Inpatients often doubt their ability to understand medical information and trust their physicians to take the best decisions for them. Tailored strategies that inform hospitalized patients, acknowledging their concerns and preferences, may be useful to promote patient involvement and to improve communication regarding antibiotic use.

摘要

目的

探索五家欧洲医院住院患者对抗生素的体验和看法。

方法

这是一项定性研究,采用以患者为中心的框架来探讨住院患者对抗生素治疗的体验。我们在五家医院中选取接受抗生素治疗的住院患者作为研究对象,采用目的抽样法进行访谈(所有中心)和焦点小组讨论(仅在瑞士开展)。

结果

共进行了 31 次访谈(比利时 5 次,克罗地亚 10 次,法国 9 次,荷兰 5 次,瑞士 2 次)和 3 次焦点小组讨论(瑞士 11 名参与者)。参与者的中位年龄为 61 岁(范围 33-86 岁)。出现了以下主要主题:(a)尽管关于抗生素相关方面的沟通常常不足,但患者信任医生会为他们做出最佳决策;(b)患者认为医生由于时间限制而不优先进行沟通,并且似乎不会根据患者的偏好调整信息;(c)患者在希望获得信息方面存在差异,但总体上希望以可理解的方式了解抗生素治疗的主要方面;(d)患者经常在与亲密家人分享抗生素治疗信息时感到安心;(e)专业人员应探讨患者参与或不参与抗生素治疗共同决策的意愿。

结论

住院患者常常怀疑自己理解医疗信息的能力,并信任医生为他们做出最佳决策。针对住院患者的个体化策略,告知他们的关注点和偏好,可能有助于促进患者参与,并改善抗生素使用方面的沟通。

相似文献

1
Views and experiences with regard to antibiotic use of hospitalized patients in five European countries: a qualitative descriptive study.关于五个欧洲国家住院患者抗生素使用的观点和经验:一项定性描述性研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Feb;25(2):249.e7-249.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.04.030. Epub 2018 May 17.
2
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
3
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
4
Perspectives of decision-making in requests for euthanasia: a qualitative research among patients, relatives and treating physicians in the Netherlands.关于安乐死请求中决策的观点:荷兰患者、亲属和治疗医生的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2013 Jan;27(1):27-37. doi: 10.1177/0269216312463259. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
5
Exploring adult inpatients' perceptions, understanding and preferences regarding the term 'malnutrition': A qualitative study.探讨成年住院患者对“营养不良”这一术语的认知、理解和偏好:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Aug;33(8):3236-3246. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17175. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
6
Perspectives of Medical Specialists on Sharing Decisions in Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study Concerning Chemotherapy Decisions With Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma.医学专家对癌症治疗中共同决策的看法:一项关于复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者化疗决策的定性研究
Oncologist. 2015 Oct;20(10):1182-8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0095. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
7
Decision making in pediatric oncology: Views of parents and physicians in two European countries.儿科肿瘤学中的决策制定:两个欧洲国家父母与医生的观点
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):21-31. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2016.1234519. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
8
Mental health inpatients' and staff members' suggestions for reducing physical restraint: A qualitative study.精神科住院患者和工作人员对减少身体约束的建议:一项定性研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Apr;25(3):188-200. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12453. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
9
What will make patients use a patient decision aid? A qualitative study on patients' perspectives on implementation barriers and facilitators.什么会促使患者使用患者决策辅助工具?一项关于患者对实施障碍和促进因素看法的定性研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Jun;26(3):755-764. doi: 10.1111/jep.13161. Epub 2019 May 21.
10
Are patients discharged with care? A qualitative study of perceptions and experiences of patients, family members and care providers.患者出院时得到妥善照料了吗?一项关于患者、家属及护理人员认知与体验的定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec;21 Suppl 1:i39-49. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001165. Epub 2012 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospitalised patients as stewards of their own antibiotic therapy: a qualitative analysis informing the strategic design of interventions to encourage shared decision-making in tertiary hospital settings in Singapore.住院患者作为自身抗生素治疗的管理者:一项定性分析,为鼓励在新加坡三级医院环境中进行共享决策的干预措施的战略设计提供信息。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 31;12:1347764. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1347764. eCollection 2024.
2
Patient and public understanding of antimicrobial resistance: a systematic review and meta-ethnography.患者及公众对抗菌素耐药性的理解:一项系统综述与元民族志研究
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2024 Aug 7;6(4):dlae117. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae117. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Decisions on antibiotic prescribing for suspected urinary tract infections in frail older adults: a qualitative study in four European countries.
衰弱老年人疑似尿路感染抗生素处方决策:四个欧洲国家的定性研究。
Age Ageing. 2022 Jun 1;51(6). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac134.
4
Autonomy, power dynamics and antibiotic use in primary healthcare: A qualitative study.基层医疗保健中的自主性、权力动态与抗生素使用:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 18;15(12):e0244432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244432. eCollection 2020.
5
Patient engagement with antibiotic messaging in secondary care: a qualitative feasibility study of the 'review and revise' experience.二级医疗保健中患者对抗生素信息的参与度:关于“回顾与修订”体验的定性可行性研究
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Apr 4;6:43. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00590-5. eCollection 2020.
6
Quality of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) care from the patient's perspective: a qualitative study.从患者角度看门诊患者的肠外抗菌治疗(OPAT)质量:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 12;8(11):e024564. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024564.