Suppr超能文献

躯干姿势调整:8周腰椎稳定训练计划后的中期可靠性及其与临床结局变化的相关性

Trunk postural adjustments: Medium-term reliability and correlation with changes of clinical outcomes following an 8-week lumbar stabilization exercise program.

作者信息

Boucher Jean-Alexandre, Preuss Richard, Henry Sharon M, Nugent Marilee, Larivière Christian

机构信息

School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal Rehabilitation Institute, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

School of Physical & Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal Rehabilitation Institute, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2018 Aug;41:66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 Apr 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) has been previously associated with delayed anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) determined by trunk muscle activation. Lumbar stabilization exercise programs (LSEP) for patients with LBP may restore the trunk neuromuscular control of the lumbar spine, and normalize APAs. This exploratory study aimed at testing the reliability of EMG and kinematics-based postural adjustment measures over an 8-week interval, assessing their sensitivity to LBP status and treatment and examining their relationship with clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Muscle activation of 10 trunk muscles, using surface electromyography (EMG), and lumbar angular kinematics were recorded during a rapid arm-raising/lowering task. Patients with LBP were tested before and after an 8-week LSEP. Healthy controls receiving no treatment were assessed over the same interval to determine the reliability of the measures and act as a control group at baseline. Muscle activation onsets and reactive range of motion, range of velocities and accelerations were assessed for between group differences at baseline and pre- to post-treatment effects within patients with LBP using t-tests. Correlations between these dependent variables and the change of clinical outcomes (pain, disability) over treatment were also explored.

RESULTS

Kinematic-based measures showed comparable reliability to EMG-based measures. Between-group differences were found in lumbar lateral flexion ROM at baseline (patients < controls). In the patients with LBP, lateral flexion velocity and acceleration significantly increased following the LSEP. Correlational analyses revealed that lumbar angular kinematics were more sensitive to changes in pain intensity following the LSEP compared to EMG measures. These findings are interpreted in from the perspective of guarding behaviors and lumbar stability hypotheses.

CONCLUSION

Future clinical trials are needed to target patients with and without delayed APAs at baseline and to explore the sensitivity of different outcome measures related to APAs. Different tasks more challenging to postural stability may need to be explored to more effectively reveal APA dysfunction.

摘要

背景

下背痛(LBP)先前已与由躯干肌肉激活所决定的延迟预期姿势调整(APA)相关联。针对LBP患者的腰椎稳定锻炼计划(LSEP)可能恢复腰椎的躯干神经肌肉控制,并使APA正常化。本探索性研究旨在测试基于肌电图(EMG)和运动学的姿势调整测量在8周间隔内的可靠性,评估它们对LBP状态和治疗的敏感性,并检查它们与临床结果的关系。

方法

在快速手臂上举/放下任务期间,使用表面肌电图(EMG)记录10块躯干肌肉的肌肉激活情况,并记录腰椎角运动学数据。LBP患者在8周LSEP前后进行测试。未接受治疗的健康对照在相同间隔内进行评估,以确定测量的可靠性,并作为基线对照组。使用t检验评估肌肉激活起始时间以及反应性运动范围、速度范围和加速度,以比较基线时的组间差异以及LBP患者治疗前后的效果。还探讨了这些因变量与治疗期间临床结果(疼痛、残疾)变化之间的相关性。

结果

基于运动学的测量显示出与基于EMG的测量相当的可靠性。在基线时发现腰椎侧屈活动度存在组间差异(患者<对照)。在LBP患者中,LSEP后侧屈速度和加速度显著增加。相关分析表明,与EMG测量相比,腰椎角运动学对LSEP后疼痛强度的变化更敏感。这些发现从保护行为和腰椎稳定性假设的角度进行了解释。

结论

未来的临床试验需要针对基线时有和没有延迟APA的患者,并探索与APA相关的不同结局测量的敏感性。可能需要探索对姿势稳定性更具挑战性的不同任务,以更有效地揭示APA功能障碍。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验