Lomond Karen V, Jacobs Jesse V, Hitt Juvena R, DeSarno Michael J, Bunn Janice Y, Henry Sharon M
Division of Health and Exercise Sciences, School of Health Sciences, 1179 Health Professions Building, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA.
Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, College of Nursing and Health Science, 106 Carrigan Drive, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405-0068, USA.
Spine J. 2015 Apr 1;15(4):596-606. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.10.020. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
People with low back pain (LBP) exhibit impaired anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs).
To evaluate whether current motor retraining treatments address LBP-associated changes in movement coordination during tasks that do and do not require APAs.
Prospectively registered randomized controlled trial with a blinded assessor.
Outcome evaluations occurred in a university laboratory; treatments were carried out in outpatient physical therapy clinics.
Fifteen subjects without LBP and 33 subjects with chronic, recurrent, and nonspecific LBP.
Twelve subjects with LBP received stabilization treatment, 21 received movement system impairment-based treatment, for more than 6 weekly 1-hour sessions plus home exercises.
Pre- and post-treatment, surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded bilaterally from trunk and leg muscles during unsupported and supported leg-lifting tasks, which did and did not require an APA, respectively. Vertical reaction forces under the contralateral leg were recorded to characterize the APA. Oswestry disability scores and numeric pain ratings were also recorded.
Persons with LBP demonstrated an impaired APA compared with persons without LBP, characterized by increased premovement contralateral force application and increased postmovement trunk EMG amplitude, regardless of the task. After treatments, both groups similarly improved in disability and function; however, APA characteristics did not change (ie, force application or EMG amplitude) in either task.
Treating clinicians were not blinded to treatment allocation, only short-term outcomes were assessed, and main effects of treatment do not rule out nonspecific effects of time or repeated exposure.
Movement impairments in persons with LBP are not limited to tasks requiring an APA. Stabilization and movement system impairment-based treatments for LBP do not ameliorate and may exacerbate APA impairments (ie, excessive force application and increased post-movement trunk muscle activation).
腰痛患者表现出预期姿势调整(APA)受损。
评估当前的运动再训练治疗是否能解决在需要和不需要APA的任务中与腰痛相关的运动协调变化。
由盲法评估者进行的前瞻性注册随机对照试验。
在大学实验室进行结果评估;治疗在门诊物理治疗诊所进行。
15名无腰痛的受试者和33名患有慢性、复发性和非特异性腰痛的受试者。
12名腰痛患者接受稳定化治疗,21名接受基于运动系统损伤的治疗,每周进行超过6次,每次1小时的治疗,并进行家庭锻炼。
治疗前后,在无支撑和有支撑的抬腿任务中,分别从躯干和腿部肌肉双侧记录表面肌电图(EMG),这两种任务分别需要和不需要APA。记录对侧腿部下方的垂直反作用力以表征APA。还记录了Oswestry功能障碍评分和数字疼痛评分。
与无腰痛的人相比,腰痛患者的APA受损,其特征是运动前对侧力应用增加和运动后躯干EMG振幅增加,与任务无关。治疗后,两组在功能障碍和功能方面均有类似改善;然而,在任何一项任务中,APA特征均未改变(即力应用或EMG振幅)。
治疗临床医生对治疗分配不设盲,仅评估短期结果,且治疗的主要效果不能排除时间或重复暴露的非特异性影响。
腰痛患者的运动障碍不限于需要APA的任务。基于稳定化和运动系统损伤的腰痛治疗不能改善,且可能会加重APA损伤(即过度用力和运动后躯干肌肉激活增加)。