Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, São Paulo, Brazil.
MSD Animal Health, São Paulo, 04583-110, Brazil.
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Aug;101(8):7334-7347. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-14002. Epub 2018 May 16.
The general objective of this study was to evaluate whether cephapirin sodium is noninferior compared with a positive control broad-spectrum product formulated with a combination of antimicrobials for intramammary treatment of nonsevere clinical mastitis. In addition, we compared the efficacy of treatments on the cure risks of pathogen groups (gram-positive, gram-negative, and cultures with no growth) based on culture results. A total of 346 cows distributed in 31 commercial dairy herds were selected to participate in the study, although only 236 met the criteria for evaluation of microbiological cure. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most isolated gram-positive pathogens in pretreatment milk samples, whereas the most common gram-negative bacterium was Escherichia coli. Cows attending the postadmission criteria were treated with 4 intramammary infusions (12 h apart) of one of the following antimicrobials: 300 mg of cephapirin sodium + 20 mg of prednisolone (CS), or the positive control treatment formulated with a combination of antimicrobials (200 mg of tetracycline + 250 mg of neomycin + 28 mg of bacitracin + 10 mg of prednisolone; TNB). Noninferiority analysis and mixed regression models (overall and considering the pathogen groups) were performed for the following outcomes: bacteriological cure (absence of the causative pathogens in cultures performed in milk samples collected at 14 and 21 ± 3 d after enrollment), pathogen cure (absence of any pathogen on both follow-up samples), clinical cure (absence of clinical sign in the milk and mammary gland at 48 h after the last antimicrobial infusion), extended clinical cure (normal milk and normal gland on the second posttreatment sample collection (d 21), and linear score of somatic cell count cure [linear score of somatic cell count recovery (≤4.0) on d 21 ± 3 after enrollment]. No significant differences were observed between treatments regarding any of the evaluated outcomes in both regression models (overall and considering the pathogen groups). Noninferiority of CS relative to TNB was inconclusive for bacteriological cure (CS = 0.68; TNB = 0.73) and clinical cure (CS = 0.88; TNB = 0.94), as the confidence intervals crossed the pre-stated margin of noninferiority (Δ = -0.15). Cephapirin sodium was noninferior compared with TNB for pathogen cure (CS = 0.36; TNB = 0.35), extended clinical cure (CS = 0.93; TNB = 0.92), and linear score of somatic cell count cure (CS = 0.29; TNB = 0.28). In conclusion, the use of intramammary CS for treatment of nonsevere clinical mastitis has similar efficacy as a treatment regimen with a combination of antimicrobial agents (tetracycline + neomycin + bacitracin), although noninferiority analysis showed inconclusive results for bacteriological and clinical cures.
本研究的总体目标是评估头孢匹林钠是否与含有组合抗菌药物的阳性对照广谱产品相比在非严重临床乳腺炎的局部治疗中具有非劣效性。此外,我们还根据培养结果比较了治疗对病原体组(革兰阳性、革兰阴性和无生长培养物)治愈风险的影响。共选择了 346 头分布在 31 个商业奶牛场的奶牛参与研究,尽管只有 236 头符合微生物学治愈评估标准。凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌是预处理奶样中最常见的革兰氏阳性病原体,而最常见的革兰氏阴性菌是大肠杆菌。符合入院标准的奶牛接受了 4 次局部应用抗生素治疗(间隔 12 小时),药物为:头孢匹林钠 300mg+泼尼松龙 20mg(CS)或含有组合抗生素的阳性对照治疗(四环素 200mg+新霉素 250mg+杆菌肽 28mg+泼尼松龙 10mg;TNB)。进行了非劣效性分析和混合回归模型(整体和考虑病原体组),评估以下结果:细菌学治愈(在入组后 14 天和 21±3 天采集的牛奶样本中不存在致病病原体)、病原体治愈(两次随访样本中均不存在任何病原体)、临床治愈(在最后一次抗生素输注后 48 小时内牛奶和乳腺无临床症状)、扩展临床治愈(第二次治疗后样本采集(第 21 天)时牛奶和乳腺正常)和体细胞计数线性评分治愈[入组后第 21±3 天(d21)的体细胞计数恢复(≤4.0)的线性评分]。在整体和考虑病原体组的回归模型中,两种治疗方法在任何评估结果方面均无显著差异。CS 相对于 TNB 的非劣效性对于细菌学治愈(CS=0.68;TNB=0.73)和临床治愈(CS=0.88;TNB=0.94)的结论不确定,因为置信区间跨越了预先设定的非劣效性边界(Δ=-0.15)。头孢匹林钠在病原体治愈(CS=0.36;TNB=0.35)、扩展临床治愈(CS=0.93;TNB=0.92)和体细胞计数线性评分治愈(CS=0.29;TNB=0.28)方面与 TNB 相比具有非劣效性。总之,CS 局部应用于非严重临床乳腺炎的治疗与含有抗菌药物(四环素+新霉素+杆菌肽)的治疗方案具有相似的疗效,尽管非劣效性分析显示细菌学和临床治愈率的结果不确定。