Department of Agricultural Research for Northern Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83 Umeå, Sweden.
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR, United Kingdom.
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Aug;101(8):7133-7145. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14449. Epub 2018 May 16.
This study compared the effects of a grain-based conventional concentrate (GC) and a concentrate based on agro-industrial by-products (BC), fed with grass silage harvested at early (ES) or late (LS) maturity stage, on dairy performance, CH and CO emissions, and metabolic status of dairy cows. Twenty lactating Nordic Red cows averaging 81 d in milk and 31.9 kg of milk/d pre-trial were assigned to a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design. Dietary treatments were in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. The silages were harvested 2 wk apart from the same primary growth grass ley. The GC was made from oats, barley and wheat, and soybean meal, whereas the BC contained sugar beet pulp, wheat bran, canola meal, distillers dried grains, palm kernel expeller, and molasses. The diets were fed ad libitum as total mixed rations and were formulated from 661 g/kg of silage, 326 g/kg of concentrate, and 13 g/kg of minerals on a dry matter basis. The BC supplied the cows with less energy. Despite this, milk yield and composition were unaffected by concentrate type, except that milk protein was 0.7 g/kg lower in cows fed BC than in those fed GC. These results were accompanied by a 44 g/kg decrease in total-tract digestibility of crude protein and a 54 g/kg increase in neutral detergent fiber digestibility for cows fed BC. Cows fed ES on average consumed 2 kg/d more dry matter and yielded 3.5 kg/d more milk, 149 g/d more protein, and 141 g/d more fat than cows fed LS. There were few interaction effects between concentrate and silage sources on daily intake and dairy performance. However, edible feed conversion ratio (human-edible output in animal/potentially human-edible feed) showed greater improvements with ES than LS when replacing GC with BC. Feeding diets with late-cut silage generally reduced digestibility and energy utilization efficiency, but improved N utilization efficiency. Feeding LS also led to greater CH yield and CH/CO ratio, and higher plasma concentration of nonesterified fatty acids. Plasma parameters reflecting energy metabolism and inflammation were all within the normal ranges, indicating that the cows were in good health during the experiment. In conclusion, a conventional concentrate can be replaced by agro-industrial by-products without compromising production in early lactation dairy cows. However, silage maturity has a stronger effect on the production traits of dairy cows than type of concentrate.
本研究比较了基于谷物的传统浓缩饲料(GC)和基于农业工业副产品的浓缩饲料(BC)对奶牛生产性能、CH 和 CO 排放以及代谢状态的影响,这些浓缩饲料分别与在早期(ES)或晚期(LS)成熟阶段收获的草青贮料一起使用。20 头泌乳北欧红牛平均产奶 81 天,产奶量为 31.9kg/d,在试验前进行了复制 4×4 拉丁方设计。日粮处理采用 2×2 因子设计。青贮饲料每隔 2 周从同一主要生长草地中收获。GC 由燕麦、大麦和小麦以及大豆粉制成,而 BC 含有甜菜浆、麦麸、菜籽油粉、酒糟、棕榈仁压碎物和糖蜜。日粮作为全混合日粮自由采食,并根据干物质基础,由 661g/kg 青贮料、326g/kg 浓缩料和 13g/kg 矿物质配制而成。BC 为奶牛提供的能量较少。尽管如此,除了 BC 组奶牛的牛奶蛋白比 GC 组低 0.7g/kg 外,浓缩物类型对产奶量和组成没有影响。这些结果伴随着奶牛对粗蛋白总肠道消化率降低 44g/kg 和中性洗涤纤维消化率增加 54g/kg。与 LS 相比,ES 组奶牛平均每天多消耗 2kg 干物质,产奶量多 3.5kg/d,蛋白多 149g/d,脂肪多 141g/d。在日采食量和奶牛生产性能方面,浓缩物和青贮料来源之间很少有相互作用。然而,在用 BC 替代 GC 时,ES 比 LS 提高了可食用饲料转化率(动物/潜在可食用饲料的可食用产出)。用晚期收割的青贮料喂养通常会降低消化率和能量利用效率,但会提高氮的利用效率。用 LS 喂养还会导致更大的 CH 产量和 CH/CO 比值,以及更高的非酯化脂肪酸血浆浓度。反映能量代谢和炎症的血浆参数均在正常范围内,表明奶牛在实验期间健康状况良好。总之,在早期泌乳奶牛中,传统浓缩物可以被农业工业副产品替代,而不会降低生产性能。然而,青贮料的成熟度对奶牛的生产性能有更强的影响,而不是浓缩物的类型。