• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科手术和经导管主动脉瓣置换术 30 天再入院率:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Thirty-day readmissions in surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Centre for Patient-centered Heart and Lung research, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; KU Leuven Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

KU Leuven Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 1;268:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.026. Epub 2018 May 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.026
PMID:29779575
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 30-day all-cause readmission rate after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vary substantially. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the overall incidence, causes, and risk factors of 30-day all-cause readmission rate after SAVR and TAVR.

METHODS

Eight medical research databases were searched; Cochrane, Medline, Embase, UpToDate, PROSPERO, National Guideline Clearinghouse, SweMed and Oria. We followed The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) for this study.

RESULTS

Thirty-three articles were included in the systematic review, 32 of which were appropriate for the meta-analysis. Overall, 17% (95% CI: 16-18%) of patients in the SAVR group, and 16% (95% CI: 15-18%) in the TAVR groups were readmitted within 30 days. Heart failure, arrhythmia, infection, and respiratory problems were the most frequent causes of all-cause readmission after SAVR and TAVR. Most frequent reported prior risk factors for all-cause readmission following TAVR were diabetes, chronic lung disease/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, kidney problems, and transapical approach/nonfemoral access. For SAVR, no risk factors for 30-day all-cause readmission were reported in the literature to date.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the overall proportion of 30-day all-cause readmission after SAVR and TAVR are high. Interventions to prevent avoidable readmissions ought to be developed and implemented.

摘要

背景

主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)和经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后的 30 天全因再入院率差异很大。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以检查 SAVR 和 TAVR 后 30 天全因再入院率的总体发生率、原因和危险因素。

方法

我们检索了 8 个医学研究数据库;Cochrane、Medline、Embase、UpToDate、PROSPERO、国家指南清除中心、SweMed 和 Oria。我们遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)进行这项研究。

结果

33 篇文章被纳入系统评价,其中 32 篇适合荟萃分析。总体而言,SAVR 组中有 17%(95%CI:16-18%)的患者和 TAVR 组中有 16%(95%CI:15-18%)的患者在 30 天内再次入院。心力衰竭、心律失常、感染和呼吸问题是 SAVR 和 TAVR 后全因再入院的最常见原因。TAVR 后全因再入院最常报道的先前危险因素是糖尿病、慢性肺部疾病/慢性阻塞性肺疾病、心房颤动、肾脏问题和经心尖途径/非股动脉入路。对于 SAVR,迄今为止,文献中没有报道 30 天全因再入院的危险因素。

结论

总之,SAVR 和 TAVR 后 30 天全因再入院的总体比例较高。应当制定和实施预防可避免再入院的干预措施。

相似文献

1
Thirty-day readmissions in surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.外科手术和经导管主动脉瓣置换术 30 天再入院率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 1;268:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.026. Epub 2018 May 18.
2
Early readmissions after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement.经导管和外科主动脉瓣置换术后的早期再入院情况。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 1;90(4):662-670. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26945. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
3
Thirty-Day Readmissions After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States: Insights From the Nationwide Readmissions Database.美国经导管主动脉瓣置换术后30天再入院情况:来自全国再入院数据库的见解
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004472.
4
Outcomes and readmissions after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with cirrhosis: A propensity matched analysis.肝硬化患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术后的结局及再入院情况:一项倾向匹配分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 1;91(1):90-96. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27232. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
5
Long-term Hospital Readmissions After Surgical Vs Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后的长期住院再入院率:手术治疗与经导管治疗的比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Oct;108(4):1146-1152. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.03.077. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
6
Complications After Self-expanding Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管自膨胀式或外科主动脉瓣置换术后的并发症
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29(3):321-330. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
7
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement is Associated with Comparable Clinical Outcomes to Open Aortic Valve Surgery but with a Reduced Length of In-Patient Hospital Stay: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与开放性主动脉瓣手术的临床结局相当,但住院时间缩短:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heart Lung Circ. 2017 Mar;26(3):285-295. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
8
The risk and extent of neurologic events are equivalent for high-risk patients treated with transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement.接受经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗的高危患者发生神经事件的风险和程度相当。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jul;152(1):85-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.02.073. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
9
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Lower Surgical Risk Scores: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Early Outcomes.手术风险评分较低患者的经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术:早期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析
Heart Lung Circ. 2017 Aug;26(8):840-845. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
10
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: Evidence from a meta-analysis.中危患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:一项荟萃分析的证据
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep 1;90(3):504-515. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27041. Epub 2017 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Polyvascular Disease.多血管疾病患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较
Cardiol Ther. 2025 May 18. doi: 10.1007/s40119-025-00415-7.
2
A Retrospective Review of 30-Day Hospital Readmission Risk After Open Heart Surgery in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.心房颤动患者心脏直视手术后30天再入院风险的回顾性研究
Cureus. 2023 Sep 22;15(9):e45755. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45755. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Temporal Changes in Mortality After Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Retrospective Analysis of US Medicare Patients (2012-2019).
经导管主动脉瓣置换术和外科主动脉瓣置换术后死亡率的时间变化:美国医疗保险患者的回顾性分析(2012-2019 年)。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Oct 19;10(20):e021748. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.021748. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
4
Long term mortality and readmissions after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的长期死亡率和再入院情况。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2021 Aug;11(4):1002-1012. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-916.
5
Employment status before and after open heart valve surgery: A cohort study.心脏瓣膜手术后的就业状况:一项队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0240210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240210. eCollection 2020.
6
Facilitators of and barriers to reducing thirty-day readmissions and improving patient-reported outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement: a process evaluation of the AVRre trial.促进和阻碍主动脉瓣置换术后 30 天再入院率和改善患者报告结局的因素:AVRre 试验的过程评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 27;20(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05125-5.
7
Early follow-up after open heart valve surgery reduces healthcare costs: a propensity matched study.心脏瓣膜手术后的早期随访可降低医疗成本:一项倾向匹配研究。
Open Heart. 2019 Nov 11;6(2):e001122. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001122. eCollection 2019.
8
Experiences of informal caregivers after cardiac surgery: a systematic integrated review of qualitative and quantitative studies.心脏手术后非专业照护者的体验:定性和定量研究的系统综合评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 11;9(11):e032751. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032751.