• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管自膨胀式或外科主动脉瓣置换术后的并发症

Complications After Self-expanding Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.

作者信息

Conte John V, Hermiller James, Resar Jon R, Deeb G Michael, Gleason Thomas G, Adams David H, Popma Jeffrey J, Yakubov Steven J, Watson Daniel, Guo Jia, Zorn George L, Reardon Michael J

机构信息

Departments of Surgery and Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

St. Vincent's Heart Center of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana.

出版信息

Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29(3):321-330. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1053/j.semtcvs.2017.06.001
PMID:29195573
Abstract

Procedural complications following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) are usually reported as retrospective analyses. We report the first comparison of complications following SAVR or self-expanding TAVR from a prospectively randomized study of high-risk SAVR patients. Three hundred ninety-five TAVR and 402 SAVR patients were prospectively enrolled and randomized 1:1 to TAVR with a CoreValve bioprosthesis or a surgical bioprosthetic valve. The rates of major procedural and vascular complications occurring (periprocedurally (0-3 days) and early (4-30 days)) were compared for TAVR vs SAVR patients. All-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and major infection were similar in both periods post procedure. Within 0-3 days, the major vascular complication rate was significantly higher with TAVR (P = 0.003). Life-threatening or disabling bleeding (P < 0.001), encephalopathy (P = 0.02), atrial fibrillation (P < 0.001), and acute kidney injury (P < 0.001) were significantly higher with SAVR. Non-iliofemoral TAVR approaches had a higher incidence of major or life-threatening or disabling bleeding at 0-3days (P < 0.05). Procedural complications unique to TAVR included coronary occlusion 0.5% (2) and TAVR pop outs 2.8% (11) with no valve embolizations. Pop outs were similar between iliofemoral 2.8% (9/324) and non-iliofemoral approaches 3.0% (2/66). Procedural complications unique to SAVR included aortic dissection 0.8% (3/357) and injury to other heart structures 2.0% (7/357). The procedural complication profiles of TAVR and SAVR are unique. Intraoperative deaths were seen in TAVR only. Mortality at 3 and 30 days was similar. The higher incidence of some complications likely reflects the greater invasiveness of SAVR in this aged high-risk population.

摘要

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)或外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)后的手术并发症通常作为回顾性分析进行报告。我们报告了一项对高危SAVR患者进行的前瞻性随机研究中SAVR或自膨胀TAVR后并发症的首次比较。395例TAVR患者和402例SAVR患者被前瞻性纳入并按1:1随机分组,分别接受CoreValve生物假体的TAVR或外科生物假体瓣膜置换。比较了TAVR组和SAVR组患者发生的主要手术和血管并发症发生率(围手术期(0 - 3天)和早期(4 - 30天))。术后两个时期的全因死亡率、中风、心肌梗死和主要感染情况相似。在0 - 3天内,TAVR的主要血管并发症发生率显著更高(P = 0.003)。SAVR的危及生命或致残性出血(P < 0.001)、脑病(P = 0.02)、心房颤动(P < 0.001)和急性肾损伤(P < 0.001)发生率显著更高。非髂股动脉TAVR途径在0 - 3天时发生主要或危及生命或致残性出血的发生率更高(P < 0.05)。TAVR特有的手术并发症包括0.5%(2例)的冠状动脉闭塞和2.8%(11例)的TAVR瓣膜弹出,无瓣膜栓塞。髂股动脉途径的瓣膜弹出率为2.8%(9/324),与非髂股动脉途径的3.0%(2/66)相似。SAVR特有的手术并发症包括0.8%(3/357)的主动脉夹层和2.0%(7/357)的其他心脏结构损伤。TAVR和SAVR的手术并发症情况各不相同。仅在TAVR中出现术中死亡。3天和30天的死亡率相似。某些并发症的较高发生率可能反映了在这个老年高危人群中SAVR的侵袭性更强。

相似文献

1
Complications After Self-expanding Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管自膨胀式或外科主动脉瓣置换术后的并发症
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29(3):321-330. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
2
Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk for Surgery: A Study of Echocardiographic Change and Risk Prediction.高危手术患者中经导管主动脉瓣自膨胀置换术与外科瓣膜置换术的比较:一项关于超声心动图变化及风险预测的研究
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003426.
3
Prosthesis-patient mismatch in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: A randomized trial of a self-expanding prosthesis.高危严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的假体-患者不匹配:自膨式假体的随机试验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;151(4):1014-22, 1023.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.070. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
4
Two-Year Outcomes in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Randomized to Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: The All-Comers Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention Randomized Clinical Trial.重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者随机接受经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的两年结果:全人群北欧主动脉瓣干预随机临床试验
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003665.
5
In-hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in non-teaching hospitals.非教学医院经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的院内转归。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 1;93(5):954-962. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27968. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
6
Hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in female in the United States.美国女性经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的医院治疗结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 1;91(4):813-819. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27362. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
7
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: Evidence from a meta-analysis.中危患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:一项荟萃分析的证据
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep 1;90(3):504-515. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27041. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
8
Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: The PARTNER 3 Trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术在低危患者中的超声心动图结果:PARTNER 3 试验。
Circulation. 2020 May 12;141(19):1527-1537. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044574. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
9
Computed Tomography-Based Indexed Aortic Annulus Size to Predict Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.基于计算机断层扫描的主动脉瓣环大小指数预测人工瓣膜-患者不匹配。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr;12(4):e007396. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007396.
10
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk: A meta-analysis of randomized trials and propensity score matched observational studies.低手术风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:随机试验和倾向评分匹配观察性研究的荟萃分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 1;92(2):408-416. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27518. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive analysis of acute kidney injury incidence following transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 13,777 patients.经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄后急性肾损伤发生率的综合分析:对13777例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2025 May 27. doi: 10.1007/s12928-025-01144-3.
2
Harnessing the power of artificial intelligence in predicting all-cause mortality in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.利用人工智能预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术全因死亡率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 May 31;11:1343210. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1343210. eCollection 2024.
3
Iatrogenic Type A Aortic Dissection: Challenges and Frontiers-Contemporary Single Center Data and Clinical Perspective.
医源性A型主动脉夹层:挑战与前沿——当代单中心数据及临床视角
Aorta (Stamford). 2022 Aug;10(4):201-209. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756670. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
4
Effect of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement on All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Aortic Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄患者全因死亡率的随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 May 17;327(19):1875-1887. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.5776.
5
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 6;11(12):e054222. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054222.
6
Long-term survival after Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve replacement in Western Denmark: a multi-centre observational study.丹麦西部行 Carpentier-Edwards Perimount 主动脉瓣置换术后的长期生存:一项多中心观察性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 May 14;16(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01506-x.
7
The short-term and long-term outcomes of transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: A protocol for a systematic review.老年患者经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术的短期和长期结局:一项系统评价方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(9):e19307. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019307.
8
Prosthetic Aortic Valves: Challenges and Solutions.人工主动脉瓣:挑战与解决方案
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018 May 14;5:46. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00046. eCollection 2018.