• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年女性乳腺癌的治疗策略和生存结局:FOCUS 队列与诺丁汉队列的比较研究。

Treatment strategies and survival outcomes in older women with breast cancer: A comparative study between the FOCUS cohort and Nottingham cohort.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Geriatr Oncol. 2018 Nov;9(6):635-641. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jgo.2018.05.004
PMID:29779800
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Clinical trials investigating breast cancer treatment often exclude or misrepresent older adults. This study compares treatment patterns and survival of older women diagnosed with breast cancer between a Dutch and a British observational cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Women aged 70 years and older diagnosed with breast cancer after 1990 with a T0-T2 tumor stage and no evidence of metastatic disease were included from a population-based cohort in the Netherlands and a British hospital-based cohort in Nottingham. Main outcomes were proportions of local and systemic treatment, ten-year overall survival and ten-year relative survival for each cohort.

RESULTS

1439 patients from Nottingham and 2180 patients from the Netherlands were included. Median follow-up was 12.4 years (IQR 11.0-14.0) in the FOCUS cohort and 6.4 years (IQR 6.2-6.8) in the Nottingham cohort. British patients were more likely to receive primary endocrine therapy (50.0% vs 7.5%, P < 0.001), and less likely to be managed with mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery (47.8% vs 90.5%, P < 0.001). Ten-years overall survival was 39.4% (95% CI 37.4-41.6%) in the FOCUS cohort and 34.3% (95% CI 30.7-38.3) in the Nottingham cohort (adjusted HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87-1.08, P = 0.559). Ten-year relative survival was 82.5% (95% CI 75.6-90.1) in the FOCUS cohort and 77.6% (95% CI 66.4-90.7) in the Nottingham cohort (adjusted relative excess risk 1.67, 95% CI 1.21-2.29, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Patients in the Nottingham cohort were more likely to receive primary endocrine therapy and had worse relative survival compared to the Dutch cohort. These findings encourage further research to equalize survival rates of breast cancer throughout Europe.

摘要

目的

针对乳腺癌治疗的临床试验通常排除或歪曲老年人的情况。本研究比较了荷兰和英国观察性队列中诊断为乳腺癌的老年女性的治疗模式和生存情况。

材料与方法

纳入了荷兰基于人群的队列和英国诺丁汉基于医院的队列中 1990 年后诊断为 T0-T2 肿瘤分期且无转移疾病证据的年龄在 70 岁及以上的女性。主要结局为每个队列的局部和全身治疗比例、十年总生存率和十年相对生存率。

结果

共纳入了来自诺丁汉的 1439 名患者和来自荷兰的 2180 名患者。FOCUS 队列的中位随访时间为 12.4 年(IQR 11.0-14.0),诺丁汉队列为 6.4 年(IQR 6.2-6.8)。英国患者更有可能接受初始内分泌治疗(50.0% vs 7.5%,P<0.001),而接受乳房切除术或保乳手术的可能性较小(47.8% vs 90.5%,P<0.001)。FOCUS 队列的十年总生存率为 39.4%(95%CI 37.4-41.6%),诺丁汉队列为 34.3%(95%CI 30.7-38.3%)(调整后的 HR 0.97,95%CI 0.87-1.08,P=0.559)。FOCUS 队列的十年相对生存率为 82.5%(95%CI 75.6-90.1),诺丁汉队列为 77.6%(95%CI 66.4-90.7)(调整后的相对超额风险 1.67,95%CI 1.21-2.29,P=0.002)。

结论

与荷兰队列相比,诺丁汉队列的患者更有可能接受初始内分泌治疗,且相对生存率较差。这些发现鼓励进一步研究,以平等化整个欧洲的乳腺癌生存率。

相似文献

1
Treatment strategies and survival outcomes in older women with breast cancer: A comparative study between the FOCUS cohort and Nottingham cohort.老年女性乳腺癌的治疗策略和生存结局:FOCUS 队列与诺丁汉队列的比较研究。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2018 Nov;9(6):635-641. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 18.
2
10 year survival after breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy compared with mastectomy in early breast cancer in the Netherlands: a population-based study.荷兰保乳手术联合放疗与乳房切除术治疗早期乳腺癌的 10 年生存比较:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1158-1170. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30067-5. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
3
Treatment strategies and survival of older breast cancer patients - an international comparison between the Netherlands and Ireland.老年乳腺癌患者的治疗策略与生存情况——荷兰与爱尔兰的国际比较
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 3;10(2):e0118074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118074. eCollection 2015.
4
Breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy in T1-2N2 stage breast cancer: a population-based study on 10-year overall, relative, and distant metastasis-free survival in 3071 patients.T1-2N2期乳腺癌保乳治疗与乳房切除术的比较:一项基于人群的研究,涉及3071例患者的10年总生存率、相对生存率和无远处转移生存率。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Dec;160(3):511-521. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-4012-8. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
5
Mortality impact of less-than-standard therapy in older breast cancer patients.老年乳腺癌患者接受低于标准治疗的死亡率影响
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Jan;206(1):66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.015. Epub 2007 Oct 3.
6
Variation in treatment and survival of older patients with non-metastatic breast cancer in five European countries: a population-based cohort study from the EURECCA Breast Cancer Group.在五个欧洲国家中,非转移性乳腺癌老年患者的治疗和生存存在差异:EURECCA 乳腺癌组的一项基于人群的队列研究。
Br J Cancer. 2018 Jul;119(1):121-129. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0090-1. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
7
Differences in treatment and survival of older patients with operable breast cancer between the United Kingdom and the Netherlands - A comparison of two national prospective longitudinal multi-centre cohort studies.英国和荷兰可手术乳腺癌老年患者治疗和生存的差异 - 两项全国性前瞻性纵向多中心队列研究的比较。
Eur J Cancer. 2022 Mar;163:189-199. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.12.018. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
8
Breast cancer in elderly compared to younger patients in the Netherlands: stage at diagnosis, treatment and survival in 127,805 unselected patients.荷兰老年与年轻乳腺癌患者对比:127805 例未经选择患者的诊断时分期、治疗和生存情况。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Dec;124(3):801-7. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0898-8. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
9
Survival of older patients with metastasised breast cancer lags behind despite evolving treatment strategies--a population-based study.尽管治疗策略不断发展,但转移性乳腺癌老年患者的生存率仍落后——一项基于人群的研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Feb;51(3):310-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.11.021. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
10
Early-stage young breast cancer patients: impact of local treatment on survival.早期年轻乳腺癌患者:局部治疗对生存的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):e553-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.02.060. Epub 2011 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Frequency of use and characterization of frailty assessments in observational studies on older women with breast cancer: a systematic review.观察性研究中老年女性乳腺癌患者衰弱评估的使用频率和特征:系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 27;24(1):563. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05152-5.
2
Epidemiology of women diagnosed with breast cancer in Jordan: A 5-year survival analysis and patients' characteristics from 2 public hospitals.约旦被诊断患有乳腺癌的女性的流行病学:来自 2 家公立医院的 5 年生存分析和患者特征。
Saudi Med J. 2021 Jul;42(7):776-783. doi: 10.15537/smj.2021.42.7.20210112.
3
Exercise in older women with breast cancer during systemic therapy: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial (BREACE).
患有乳腺癌的老年女性在系统性治疗期间的运动:一项随机对照试验(BREACE)的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 7;10(10):e038674. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038674.