Richmond Sutton B, Dames Kevin D, Goble Daniel J, Fling Brett W
College of Health and Human Sciences, Department of Health and Exercise Science, Colorado State University, 951 Plum St, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
School of Professional Studies, Kinesiology Department, State University of New York Cortland, 1168 Professional Studies Building, Cortland, NY 13045, USA.
J Biomech. 2018 Jun 25;75:102-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 May 18.
Balance is a complex, sensorimotor task requiring an individual to maintain the center of gravity within the base of support. Quantifying balance in a reliable and valid manner is essential to evaluating disease progression, aging complications, and injuries in clinical and research settings. Typically, researchers use force plates to track motion of the center of gravity during a variety of tasks. However, limiting factors such as cost, portability, and availability have hindered postural stability evaluation in these settings. This study compared the "gold standard" for assessing postural stability (i.e., the laboratory-grade force plate) to a more affordable and portable assessment tool (i.e., BTrackS balance plate) in healthy young adults. Correlations and Bland-Altman plots between the center of pressure outcome measures derived from these two instruments were produced. Based on the results of this study, the measures attained from the portable balance plate objectively quantified postural stability with high validity on both rigid and compliant surfaces, demonstrated by thirty-five out of thirty-eight observed postural stability metrics in both surface conditions with a correlation of 0.98 or greater. The low cost, portable system performed similarly to the lab-grade force plate indicating the potential for practitioners and researchers to use the BTrackS balance plate as an alternative to the more expensive force plate option for assessing postural stability, whether in the lab setting or in the field.
平衡是一项复杂的感觉运动任务,要求个体将重心维持在支撑面内。以可靠且有效的方式量化平衡对于评估临床和研究环境中的疾病进展、衰老并发症及损伤至关重要。通常,研究人员使用测力板来追踪各种任务期间重心的运动。然而,诸如成本、便携性和可用性等限制因素阻碍了这些环境中的姿势稳定性评估。本研究在健康年轻成年人中,将评估姿势稳定性的“金标准”(即实验室级测力板)与一种更经济实惠且便携的评估工具(即BTrackS平衡板)进行了比较。生成了源自这两种仪器的压力中心结果测量之间的相关性和布兰德-奥特曼图。基于本研究结果,便携式平衡板获得的测量结果在刚性和柔性表面上均以高有效性客观地量化了姿势稳定性,在两种表面条件下观察到的38个姿势稳定性指标中有35个的相关性为0.98或更高,这证明了该结果。低成本的便携式系统表现与实验室级测力板相似,这表明从业者和研究人员有可能使用BTrackS平衡板作为更昂贵的测力板选项的替代方案来评估姿势稳定性,无论是在实验室环境还是在现场。