Pacheco Maria Paula, Morais Sara, Carvalho Paulo José, Cavalheiro Luís, Sousa Filipa
Coimbra Health School, Polytechnic University of Coimbra, 3046-854 Coimbra, Portugal.
Biomechanics Consultancy, 4000-122 Porto, Portugal.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 13;22(1):101. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010101.
Postural changes are considered a public health issue and have gathered significant interest in both research and clinical practice.
To evaluate the effectiveness of Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) in improving postural changes and postural stability in healthy young adults. Additionally, this study aims to identify the main postural changes in the sample population.
A longitudinal study was conducted with a sample of students (n = 38) from the 2nd and 3rd years of undergraduate programs at Coimbra Health School, divided into an experimental group (EG) with 20 subjects and a control group (CG) with 18 subjects. The EG underwent a GPR intervention, while the CG received no intervention. Postural changes were assessed using a 3D motion analysis system (Qualisys), and stabilometry was evaluated using a Bertec force platform.
At baseline (T0), the groups were homogeneous regarding sample characterization variables, as well as postural and stabilometric variables ( > 0.05). After four weeks of the intervention (T1), no significant differences were observed between the EG and CG for any of the variables studied ( > 0.05). However, within-group analysis for the experimental group revealed a significant difference ( = 0.04) in anterior-posterior velocity, indicating a reduction in this parameter from T0 to T1. In the control group, a significant difference was observed ( = 0.03) in the left knee valgus, indicating a reduction in valgus alignment.
GPR does not appear to be effective in improving postural changes or center of pressure displacement in healthy young students.
姿势变化被视为一个公共卫生问题,在研究和临床实践中都引起了极大关注。
评估整体姿势再教育(GPR)对改善健康年轻成年人姿势变化和姿势稳定性的有效性。此外,本研究旨在确定样本人群中的主要姿势变化。
对科英布拉健康学校本科二、三年级的学生样本(n = 38)进行了一项纵向研究,分为实验组(EG,20名受试者)和对照组(CG,18名受试者)。实验组接受GPR干预,而对照组不接受干预。使用3D运动分析系统(Qualisys)评估姿势变化,使用Bertec测力平台评估稳定测量。
在基线(T0)时,两组在样本特征变量以及姿势和稳定测量变量方面具有同质性(>0.05)。干预四周后(T1),在研究的任何变量上,实验组和对照组之间均未观察到显著差异(>0.05)。然而,实验组的组内分析显示前后速度存在显著差异(=0.04),表明该参数从T0到T1有所降低。在对照组中,左膝外翻存在显著差异(=0.03),表明外翻排列有所减少。
GPR似乎对改善健康年轻学生的姿势变化或压力中心位移无效。