Suppr超能文献

中心性肥胖标志物、血浆血脂谱与超重肥胖个体的心血管代谢风险预测。

Central adiposity markers, plasma lipid profile and cardiometabolic risk prediction in overweight-obese individuals.

机构信息

Dept. of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Italy; Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (ASUITS), Trieste, Italy.

Dept. of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Italy; Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (ASUITS), Trieste, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Nutr. 2019 Jun;38(3):1171-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 May 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Waist circumference (WC) is the currently recommended marker of central fat for cardiometabolic risk screening. Alternative surrogate markers have been recently proposed to better reflect the metabolic impact of central fat accumulation per se, based on WC normalization by height (Weight-to-Height Ratio - WtoH; Body Roundness Index - BRI) or body mass index (BMI) without (A Body Shape Index - ABSI) or with inclusion of plasma triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol concentrations (Visceral Adiposity Index - VAI).

METHODS

We investigated associations between WtoH, BRI, ABSI or VAI and insulin resistance (HOMA-index) or metabolic syndrome (MetS) in a general population cohort from the North-East Italy Mo.Ma. study (n = 1965, age = 49 ± 13 years, BMI = 26.7 ± 5.2 kg/m). Baseline values were also evaluated as predictors of future insulin resistance and MetS in overweight-obese individuals undergoing 5-year follow-up (Ow-Ob) (n = 263; age = 54 ± 9, BMI = 30,7 ± 4,1).

RESULTS

Compared to WC or BMI, basal WtoH and BRI were similarly associated with baseline HOMA and MetS prevalence after multiple adjustments (P < 0.001) and all markers similarly predicted 5-year HOMA and MetS (P < 0.001). Under basal conditions, superimposable results were observed for VAI whereas ABSI was less accurate or unable to identify baseline HOMA and MetS (p < 0.05 vs WtoH-BRI-VAI-WC-BMI). VAI had highest 5-year risk predictive value in Ow-Ob [ROC Area Under the Curve (AUC) VAI > WtoH-BRI-WC-BMI; p < 0.05] while no predictive value was in contrast observed for ABSI (ROC AUC ABSI < WtoH-BRI-WC-BMI; p < 0.05). Using alternate formulae with plasma lipid inclusion in ABSI and removal from VAI calculations completely reversed their 5-year predictive value and AUC.

CONCLUSIONS

The current findings do not support replacement of WC with height-normalized anthropometric central fat surrogate markers to predict cardiometabolic risk in the general and overweight-obese population. BMI-normalization impairs risk assessment unless plasma lipid concentrations are available and included in calculations.

摘要

背景

腰围(WC)是目前用于心血管代谢风险筛查的中心性肥胖的推荐标志物。最近,有人提出了替代的替代指标,基于 WC 与身高的比值(体重与身高比-WtoH;身体圆度指数-BRI)或 BMI(无或包含血浆甘油三酯和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇浓度的身体形状指数-ABSI)进行校正,以更好地反映中心性脂肪堆积的代谢影响。

方法

我们在意大利东北部的 Mo.Ma.研究(n=1965,年龄=49±13 岁,BMI=26.7±5.2kg/m)的一般人群队列中研究了 WtoH、BRI、ABSI 或 VAI 与胰岛素抵抗(HOMA 指数)或代谢综合征(MetS)之间的关联。在进行 5 年随访的超重肥胖个体(Ow-Ob)(n=263;年龄=54±9,BMI=30.7±4.1)中,我们还评估了基线值作为未来胰岛素抵抗和 MetS 的预测因子。

结果

与 WC 或 BMI 相比,在经过多次调整后,基础 WtoH 和 BRI 与基线 HOMA 和 MetS 的患病率相似(P<0.001),所有标志物均相似地预测了 5 年的 HOMA 和 MetS(P<0.001)。在基础条件下,VAI 也观察到了类似的结果,而 ABSI 则不太准确或无法识别基线 HOMA 和 MetS(p<0.05 与 WtoH-BRI-VAI-WC-BMI 相比)。VAI 在 Ow-Ob 中具有最高的 5 年风险预测值[ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)VAI>WtoH-BRI-WC-BMI;p<0.05],而 ABSI 则相反,无预测值(ROC AUC ABSI<WtoH-BRI-WC-BMI;p<0.05)。使用包含血浆脂质的替代公式替代 ABSI 中的计算和从 VAI 计算中删除完全改变了它们 5 年的预测值和 AUC。

结论

本研究结果不支持用身高标准化的中心性肥胖替代标志物替代 WC 来预测一般人群和超重肥胖人群的心血管代谢风险。除非可以获得和纳入计算中的血浆脂质浓度,否则 BMI 标准化会损害风险评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验