Levrau François, Loobuyck Patrick
Centre Pieter Gillis, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
Comp Migr Stud. 2018;6(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40878-018-0080-8. Epub 2018 May 17.
Since the 1970s multiculturalist policies that recognize and accommodate ethnocultural diversity have been implemented across western democracies. However, the tide seems to have changed: a 'backlash against multiculturalism' has been occurring since the 1990s. While it remains unclear whether this backlash is a matter of rhetoric or if there is indeed a wholesale retreat from multiculturalism, several scholars, politicians and journalists have invoked a pervasive narrative of the rise/advance and fall/retreat of multiculturalism. 'Interculturalism' has been introduced as a remedy, being allegedly well-suited to address some of the shortcomings of the multicultural approach. In this introduction to the Special Issue, which is about the key texts of Tariq Modood and Ricard Zapata Barrero, we present and question the nexus between the two terms. How has the 'multiculturalism-interculturalism' debate been held so far?
自20世纪70年代以来,承认并接纳民族文化多样性的多元文化主义政策已在西方民主国家推行。然而,形势似乎已经发生变化:自20世纪90年代以来,一场“对多元文化主义的强烈抵制”一直在出现。虽然尚不清楚这种抵制是口头上的,还是确实存在对多元文化主义的全面倒退,但一些学者、政治家和记者已经援引了一种关于多元文化主义兴衰/进退的普遍说法。“跨文化主义”作为一种补救措施被引入,据称它非常适合解决多元文化方法的一些缺点。在这本关于塔里克·莫多德(Tariq Modood)和里卡德·萨帕塔·巴雷罗(Ricard Zapata Barrero)关键文本的特刊引言中,我们呈现并质疑这两个术语之间的联系。到目前为止,“多元文化主义—跨文化主义”的辩论是如何展开的?