Suppr超能文献

引言:描绘多元文化主义与跨文化主义的争论

Introduction: mapping the multiculturalism-interculturalism debate.

作者信息

Levrau François, Loobuyck Patrick

机构信息

Centre Pieter Gillis, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

Comp Migr Stud. 2018;6(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40878-018-0080-8. Epub 2018 May 17.

Abstract

Since the 1970s multiculturalist policies that recognize and accommodate ethnocultural diversity have been implemented across western democracies. However, the tide seems to have changed: a 'backlash against multiculturalism' has been occurring since the 1990s. While it remains unclear whether this backlash is a matter of rhetoric or if there is indeed a wholesale retreat from multiculturalism, several scholars, politicians and journalists have invoked a pervasive narrative of the rise/advance and fall/retreat of multiculturalism. 'Interculturalism' has been introduced as a remedy, being allegedly well-suited to address some of the shortcomings of the multicultural approach. In this introduction to the Special Issue, which is about the key texts of Tariq Modood and Ricard Zapata Barrero, we present and question the nexus between the two terms. How has the 'multiculturalism-interculturalism' debate been held so far?

摘要

自20世纪70年代以来,承认并接纳民族文化多样性的多元文化主义政策已在西方民主国家推行。然而,形势似乎已经发生变化:自20世纪90年代以来,一场“对多元文化主义的强烈抵制”一直在出现。虽然尚不清楚这种抵制是口头上的,还是确实存在对多元文化主义的全面倒退,但一些学者、政治家和记者已经援引了一种关于多元文化主义兴衰/进退的普遍说法。“跨文化主义”作为一种补救措施被引入,据称它非常适合解决多元文化方法的一些缺点。在这本关于塔里克·莫多德(Tariq Modood)和里卡德·萨帕塔·巴雷罗(Ricard Zapata Barrero)关键文本的特刊引言中,我们呈现并质疑这两个术语之间的联系。到目前为止,“多元文化主义—跨文化主义”的辩论是如何展开的?

相似文献

1
Introduction: mapping the multiculturalism-interculturalism debate.
Comp Migr Stud. 2018;6(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40878-018-0080-8. Epub 2018 May 17.
2
Moving the debate forward: interculturalism's contribution to multiculturalism.
Comp Migr Stud. 2018;6(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40878-018-0078-2. Epub 2018 May 17.
3
Is the post-multicultural era pro-diversity?
Comp Migr Stud. 2018;6(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40878-018-0084-4. Epub 2018 May 17.
4
Must Interculturalists misrepresent multiculturalism?
Comp Migr Stud. 2017;5(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40878-017-0058-y. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
5
War of words: interculturalism v. multiculturalism.
Comp Migr Stud. 2018;6(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40878-018-0079-1. Epub 2018 May 17.
6
Interculturalism in the post-multicultural debate: a defence.
Comp Migr Stud. 2017;5(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40878-017-0057-z. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
7
The retreat of multiculturalism in the liberal state: theory and policy.
Br J Sociol. 2004 Jun;55(2):237-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2004.00017.x.
8
Rejoinder: multiculturalism and interculturalism: alongside but separate.
Comp Migr Stud. 2018;6(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40878-018-0090-6. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
9
Towards a new way of interacting? Pondering the role of an interpersonal ethos.
Comp Migr Stud. 2018;6(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40878-018-0081-7. Epub 2018 May 17.
10
Interculturalism: Not a new policy paradigm.
Comp Migr Stud. 2018;6(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40878-018-0091-5. Epub 2018 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
On the universality of medical device regulations: the case of Benin.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 12;22(1):1031. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08396-2.
2
Interculturalism: Not a new policy paradigm.
Comp Migr Stud. 2018;6(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40878-018-0091-5. Epub 2018 Jun 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Must Interculturalists misrepresent multiculturalism?
Comp Migr Stud. 2017;5(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40878-017-0058-y. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
2
Interculturalism in the post-multicultural debate: a defence.
Comp Migr Stud. 2017;5(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40878-017-0057-z. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
3
The retreat of multiculturalism in the liberal state: theory and policy.
Br J Sociol. 2004 Jun;55(2):237-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2004.00017.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验