Boucher François, Maclure Jocelyn
Centre for Ethics, Social and Political Philosophy, KU Leuven, Institute of Philosophy, Kardinaal Mercierplein 2, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
2Faculty of Philosophy, Université Laval, Pavillon Félix-Antoine-Savard, 2325, rue des Bibliothèques, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada.
Comp Migr Stud. 2018;6(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40878-018-0078-2. Epub 2018 May 17.
In this article, we compare Ricard Zappata-Barrero's interculturalism with Tariq Modood's multiculturalism. We will discuss the relation between distinct elements that compose both positions. We examine how recent discussions on interculturalism have the potential to contribute to theories of multiculturalism without undermining their core principles. Our position is close to that of Modood's as he has already carefully tried to incorporate interculturalist insights into his own multiculturalism. Yet we provide a raise a few questions regarding Modood's treatment of the relation between multiculturalism and interculturalism. After summarizing each author's potion (I), we will comment on the following set of relations between their basic elements: (II) The relation between intercultural contact and intercultural dialogue; (III) The relation between contact at the local level and the societal/state level; (IV) The relation between group-specific measures, intercultural contact and mainstreaming.
在本文中，我们将里卡德·萨帕塔 - 巴雷罗的跨文化主义与塔里克·莫多德的多元文化主义进行比较。我们将探讨构成这两种立场的不同要素之间的关系。我们研究近期关于跨文化主义的讨论如何有可能在不损害多元文化主义核心原则的情况下，为多元文化主义理论做出贡献。我们的立场与莫多德相近，因为他已经认真尝试将跨文化主义的见解融入他自己的多元文化主义之中。然而，我们对莫多德处理多元文化主义与跨文化主义之间关系的方式提出了一些问题。在总结每位作者的观点（一）之后，我们将对他们基本要素之间的以下几组关系进行评论：（二）跨文化接触与跨文化对话之间的关系；（三）地方层面的接触与社会/国家层面的接触之间的关系；（四）针对特定群体的措施、跨文化接触与主流化之间的关系。
