• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农业措施对减少耕作系统对农田 CH4 和 N2O 排放影响的作用:全球荟萃分析。

Impact of agronomy practices on the effects of reduced tillage systems on CH4 and N2O emissions from agricultural fields: A global meta-analysis.

机构信息

China National Rice Research Institution, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 May 21;13(5):e0196703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196703. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0196703
PMID:29782525
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5962074/
Abstract

The effect of no- and reduced tillage (NT/RT) on greenhouse gas (GHG) emission was highly variable and may depend on other agronomy practices. However, how the other practices affect the effect of NT/RT on GHG emission remains elusive. Therefore, we conducted a global meta-analysis (including 49 papers with 196 comparisons) to assess the effect of five options (i.e. cropping system, crop residue management, split application of N fertilizer, irrigation, and tillage duration) on the effect of NT/RT on CH4 and N2O emissions from agricultural fields. The results showed that NT/RT significantly mitigated the overall global warming potential (GWP) of CH4 and N2O emissions by 6.6% as compared with conventional tillage (CT). Rotation cropping systems and crop straw remove facilitated no-tillage (NT) to reduce the CH4, N2O, or overall GWP both in upland and paddy field. NT significantly mitigated the overall GWP when the percentage of basal N fertilizer (PBN) >50%, when tillage duration > 10 years or rainfed in upland, while when PBN <50%, when duration between 5 and 10 years, or with continuous flooding in paddy field. RT significantly reduced the overall GWP under single crop monoculture system in upland. These results suggested that assessing the effectiveness of NT/RT on the mitigation of GHG emission should consider the interaction of NT/RT with other agronomy practices and land use type.

摘要

免耕和少耕(NT/RT)对温室气体(GHG)排放的影响差异很大,可能取决于其他农业实践。然而,其他实践如何影响 NT/RT 对 GHG 排放的影响仍不清楚。因此,我们进行了一项全球荟萃分析(包括 49 篇论文,共 196 个比较),以评估五种选择(即种植制度、作物残茬管理、氮肥分期施用、灌溉和耕作时间)对 NT/RT 对农田 CH4 和 N2O 排放的影响。结果表明,与常规耕作(CT)相比,NT/RT 可显著降低 CH4 和 N2O 排放的整体全球变暖潜势(GWP)6.6%。轮作制度和作物秸秆去除有利于免耕(NT)减少旱地和水田的 CH4、N2O 或整体 GWP。当基施氮肥比例(PBN)>50%、耕作时间>10 年或旱地雨养时,NT 可显著降低整体 GWP,而当 PBN<50%、耕作时间为 5-10 年或水田连续淹水时,NT 可显著降低整体 GWP。旱地单一种植制度下,RT 可显著降低整体 GWP。这些结果表明,评估 NT/RT 对 GHG 减排的有效性应考虑 NT/RT 与其他农业实践和土地利用类型的相互作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d95/5962074/9c57f99daa7c/pone.0196703.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d95/5962074/e56f397faa78/pone.0196703.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d95/5962074/192cb77aedf3/pone.0196703.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d95/5962074/ed2634f94a3d/pone.0196703.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d95/5962074/f063027e6621/pone.0196703.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d95/5962074/285b2fd61b5a/pone.0196703.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d95/5962074/f483a4c2c676/pone.0196703.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d95/5962074/8935b2a4e48f/pone.0196703.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d95/5962074/9c57f99daa7c/pone.0196703.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d95/5962074/e56f397faa78/pone.0196703.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d95/5962074/192cb77aedf3/pone.0196703.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d95/5962074/ed2634f94a3d/pone.0196703.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d95/5962074/f063027e6621/pone.0196703.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d95/5962074/285b2fd61b5a/pone.0196703.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d95/5962074/f483a4c2c676/pone.0196703.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d95/5962074/8935b2a4e48f/pone.0196703.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d95/5962074/9c57f99daa7c/pone.0196703.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of agronomy practices on the effects of reduced tillage systems on CH4 and N2O emissions from agricultural fields: A global meta-analysis.农业措施对减少耕作系统对农田 CH4 和 N2O 排放影响的作用:全球荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 May 21;13(5):e0196703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196703. eCollection 2018.
2
Long-term no-till and stover retention each decrease the global warming potential of irrigated continuous corn.长期免耕和秸秆还田处理均降低了灌溉连作玉米的全球变暖潜势。
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Jul;23(7):2848-2862. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13637. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
3
N2O and CH4 emissions from a fallow-wheat rotation with low N input in conservation and conventional tillage under a Mediterranean agroecosystem.在一种地中海农业生态系统下,低氮输入的保护性和传统耕作休耕-小麦轮作中的 N2O 和 CH4 排放。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Mar 1;508:85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.041. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
4
Soil greenhouse gas emissions affected by irrigation, tillage, crop rotation, and nitrogen fertilization.受灌溉、耕作、轮作和氮肥施用影响的土壤温室气体排放。
J Environ Qual. 2012 Nov-Dec;41(6):1774-86. doi: 10.2134/jeq2012.0176.
5
Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in irrigated cropping systems in northeastern Colorado.科罗拉多州东北部灌溉种植系统中的全球变暖潜势净值和温室气体强度
J Environ Qual. 2006 Jul 6;35(4):1584-98. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0232. Print 2006 Jul-Aug.
6
Emissions of CH4 and N2O under different tillage systems from double-cropped paddy fields in Southern China.中国南方双季稻田不同耕作制度下的甲烷(CH4)和氧化亚氮(N2O)排放
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 4;8(6):e65277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065277. Print 2013.
7
Nitrogen oxide and methane emissions under varying tillage and fertilizer management.不同耕作和肥料管理条件下的氮氧化物和甲烷排放
J Environ Qual. 2005 Aug 9;34(5):1467-77. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0018. Print 2005 Sep-Oct.
8
Responses of greenhouse gas fluxes to experimental warming in wheat season under conventional tillage and no-tillage fields.常规耕作和免耕农田冬小麦季温室气体通量对实验性增温的响应。
J Environ Sci (China). 2017 Apr;54:314-327. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2016.09.016. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
9
Greenhouse gas emissions and global warming potential of traditional and diversified tropical rice rotation systems.传统和多样化热带水稻轮作系统的温室气体排放和全球变暖潜势。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Jan;22(1):432-48. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13099. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
10
[Effects of combined applications of pig manure and chemical fertilizers on CH4 and N2O emissions and their global warming potentials in paddy fields with double-rice cropping].猪粪与化肥配施对双季稻田CH4和N2O排放及其全球增温潜势的影响
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2014 Aug;35(8):3120-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems.保护性耕作:一种提高春小麦农业生态系统产量、改善土壤性质并降低全球变暖潜力的方法。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Jun 4;15:1356426. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426. eCollection 2024.
2
Analysis of the external signals driving the transcriptional regulation of the main genes involved in denitrification in .驱动[具体研究对象]中反硝化作用相关主要基因转录调控的外部信号分析。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Mar 16;14:1109550. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1109550. eCollection 2023.
3
Management Strategies to Mitigate NO Emissions in Agriculture.

本文引用的文献

1
No tillage and liming reduce greenhouse gas emissions from poorly drained agricultural soils in Mediterranean regions.免耕和施用石灰可减少地中海地区排水不良农业土壤的温室气体排放。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Oct 1;566-567:512-520. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.117. Epub 2016 May 26.
2
Methane and nitrous oxide emissions under no-till farming in China: a meta-analysis.中国免耕农业下的甲烷和一氧化二氮排放:一项荟萃分析。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Apr;22(4):1372-84. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13185. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
3
Reduced greenhouse gas mitigation potential of no-tillage soils through earthworm activity.
减轻农业中氮氧化物排放的管理策略。
Life (Basel). 2022 Mar 17;12(3):439. doi: 10.3390/life12030439.
4
Soil Health Management Enhances Microbial Nitrogen Cycling Capacity and Activity.土壤健康管理增强微生物氮循环能力和活性。
mSphere. 2021 Jan 13;6(1):e01237-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.01237-20.
5
Carbon Footprint of Mediterranean Pasture-Based Native Beef: Effects of Agronomic Practices and Pasture Management under Different Climate Change Scenarios.地中海草饲本地牛肉的碳足迹:不同气候变化情景下农艺措施和牧场管理的影响
Animals (Basel). 2020 Mar 2;10(3):415. doi: 10.3390/ani10030415.
6
Activity and Identification of Methanotrophic Bacteria in Arable and No-Tillage Soils from Lublin Region (Poland).耕地和免耕土壤中甲烷营养细菌的活性和鉴定。来自卢布林地区(波兰)。
Microb Ecol. 2019 Apr;77(3):701-712. doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-1248-3. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
蚯蚓活动降低了免耕土壤的温室气体减排潜力。
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 4;5:13787. doi: 10.1038/srep13787.
4
Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity influenced by irrigation, tillage, crop rotation, and nitrogen fertilization.灌溉、耕作、作物轮作和氮肥施用对全球变暖潜势净值和温室气体强度的影响。
J Environ Qual. 2014 May;43(3):777-88. doi: 10.2134/jeq2013.10.0405.
5
N2O and CH4 emissions from a fallow-wheat rotation with low N input in conservation and conventional tillage under a Mediterranean agroecosystem.在一种地中海农业生态系统下,低氮输入的保护性和传统耕作休耕-小麦轮作中的 N2O 和 CH4 排放。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Mar 1;508:85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.041. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
6
To what extent can zero tillage lead to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from temperate soils?免耕在多大程度上可以减少温带土壤的温室气体排放?
Sci Rep. 2014 Apr 4;4:4586. doi: 10.1038/srep04586.
7
Greenhouse gas flux and crop productivity after 10 years of reduced and no tillage in a wheat-maize cropping system.减少和免耕 10 年后小麦-玉米种植系统中的温室气体通量和作物生产力。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 3;8(9):e73450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073450. eCollection 2013.
8
Emissions of CH4 and N2O under different tillage systems from double-cropped paddy fields in Southern China.中国南方双季稻田不同耕作制度下的甲烷(CH4)和氧化亚氮(N2O)排放
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 4;8(6):e65277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065277. Print 2013.
9
Soil nitrous oxide emissions following crop residue addition: a meta-analysis.添加作物残体后土壤一氧化二氮排放的元分析。
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Oct;19(10):2956-64. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12274. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
10
Climate, duration, and N placement determine N2 O emissions in reduced tillage systems: a meta-analysis.气候、持续时间和氮肥位置决定了减少耕作系统中的 N2 O 排放:一项荟萃分析。
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Jan;19(1):33-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02779.x. Epub 2012 Aug 3.