• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

混合方法研究在 STEM 中点击器实施风格。

A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Clicker Implementation Styles in STEM.

机构信息

Center for Integrative Research on Cognition, Learning, and Education.

Career Center.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Jun;17(2):ar30. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-08-0180.

DOI:10.1187/cbe.17-08-0180
PMID:29786474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5998309/
Abstract

Active learning with clickers is a common approach in high-enrollment, lecture-based courses in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. In this study, we describe the procedures that faculty at one institution used when implementing clicker-based active learning, and how they situated these activities in their class sessions. Using a mixed-methods approach, we categorized faculty into four implementation styles based on quantitative observation data and conducted qualitative interviews to further understand why faculty used these styles. We found that faculty tended to use similar procedures when implementing a clicker activity, but differed on how they situated the clicker-based active learning into their courses. These variations were attributed to different faculty goals for using clicker-based active learning, with some using it to engage students at specific time points throughout their class sessions and others who selected it as the best way to teach a concept from several possible teaching techniques. Future research should continue to investigate and describe how active-learning strategies from literature may differ from what is being implemented.

摘要

在科学、技术、工程和数学领域的高招生、基于讲座的课程中,使用点击器进行主动学习是一种常见的方法。在这项研究中,我们描述了一所机构的教师在实施基于点击器的主动学习时所采用的程序,以及他们如何将这些活动融入他们的课程中。我们使用混合方法,根据定量观察数据将教师分为四种实施风格,并进行了定性访谈,以进一步了解教师为什么采用这些风格。我们发现,教师在实施点击器活动时往往采用类似的程序,但在将基于点击器的主动学习融入课程方面存在差异。这些差异归因于教师使用基于点击器的主动学习的不同目标,有些教师希望在课程的特定时间点吸引学生,而有些教师则选择它作为教授几个可能的教学技巧中的概念的最佳方法。未来的研究应该继续调查和描述文献中的主动学习策略与实际实施之间可能存在的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/020e/5998309/2262e9adad34/cbe-17-ar30-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/020e/5998309/a5226901f971/cbe-17-ar30-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/020e/5998309/82e34b4127fb/cbe-17-ar30-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/020e/5998309/c7461e957c86/cbe-17-ar30-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/020e/5998309/2f4dc974c655/cbe-17-ar30-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/020e/5998309/cb3163b533e1/cbe-17-ar30-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/020e/5998309/2262e9adad34/cbe-17-ar30-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/020e/5998309/a5226901f971/cbe-17-ar30-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/020e/5998309/82e34b4127fb/cbe-17-ar30-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/020e/5998309/c7461e957c86/cbe-17-ar30-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/020e/5998309/2f4dc974c655/cbe-17-ar30-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/020e/5998309/cb3163b533e1/cbe-17-ar30-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/020e/5998309/2262e9adad34/cbe-17-ar30-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Clicker Implementation Styles in STEM.混合方法研究在 STEM 中点击器实施风格。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Jun;17(2):ar30. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-08-0180.
2
A Campus-Wide Investigation of Clicker Implementation: The Status of Peer Discussion in STEM Classes.一项关于点击器实施的全校范围调查:科学、技术、工程和数学课程中同伴讨论的现状。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Spring;15(1):ar6. doi: 10.1187/cbe.15-10-0224.
3
PORTAAL: A Classroom Observation Tool Assessing Evidence-Based Teaching Practices for Active Learning in Large Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Classes.PORTAAL:一种课堂观察工具,用于评估在大型科学、技术、工程和数学课程中基于证据的主动学习教学实践。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015 Summer;14(2):14:ar23. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-06-0095. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
4
On faculty development of STEM inclusive teaching practices.关于促进包含STEM的教学实践的教师专业发展
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2017 Oct 2;364(18). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx179.
5
Classroom sound can be used to classify teaching practices in college science courses.课堂声音可用于对大学理科课程的教学实践进行分类。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Mar 21;114(12):3085-3090. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618693114. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
6
Challenge faculty to transform STEM learning.激励教师转变STEM学习方式。
Science. 2015 Oct 16;350(6258):281-2. doi: 10.1126/science.aab0933.
7
A campus-wide study of STEM courses: new perspectives on teaching practices and perceptions.一项关于STEM课程的全校范围研究:教学实践与认知的新视角
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2014 Winter;13(4):624-35. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-06-0108.
8
An exploration of the relationship between active learning and student motivation in STEM: a mixed methods study.主动学习与 STEM 学生动机关系的探索:混合方法研究。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2024 Sep 1;48(3):621-638. doi: 10.1152/advan.00247.2022. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
9
STEM Faculty as Learners in Pedagogical Reform and the Role of Research Articles as Professional Development Opportunities.理工科教师作为教学改革中的学习者以及研究文章作为专业发展机会的作用。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 winter;15(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.15-12-0251.
10
Welcoming Deaf Students into STEM: Recommendations for University Science Education.欢迎聋生进入 STEM 领域:对大学理科教育的建议。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Sep;17(3):es10. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-05-0081.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting implementation of active learning by tenure-track teaching faculty using robust cluster analysis.使用稳健聚类分析预测终身教职教师实施主动学习的情况。
Int J STEM Educ. 2022;9(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40594-022-00365-9. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
2
Comparison of Cluster Analysis Methodologies for Characterization of Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS) Data.比较分析方法在本科 STEM 课堂观察协议(COPUS)数据特征描述中的应用。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Mar;20(1):ar3. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-04-0077.

本文引用的文献

1
Metacognition in Upper-Division Biology Students: Awareness Does Not Always Lead to Control.高年段生物学学生的元认知:意识并不总是能带来控制。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Summer;16(2). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-09-0286.
2
Fidelity of Implementation: An Overlooked Yet Critical Construct to Establish Effectiveness of Evidence-Based Instructional Practices.实施保真度:一个被忽视但至关重要的构建,用于建立基于证据的教学实践的有效性。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Spring;16(1). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-03-0113.
3
Mixed-Methods Design in Biology Education Research: Approach and Uses.
生物学教育研究中的混合方法设计:方法与应用
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Winter;15(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-01-0022.
4
STEM Faculty as Learners in Pedagogical Reform and the Role of Research Articles as Professional Development Opportunities.理工科教师作为教学改革中的学习者以及研究文章作为专业发展机会的作用。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 winter;15(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.15-12-0251.
5
A Campus-Wide Investigation of Clicker Implementation: The Status of Peer Discussion in STEM Classes.一项关于点击器实施的全校范围调查:科学、技术、工程和数学课程中同伴讨论的现状。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Spring;15(1):ar6. doi: 10.1187/cbe.15-10-0224.
6
The best of both worlds: Building on the COPUS and RTOP observation protocols to easily and reliably measure various levels of reformed instructional practice.两全其美:以COPUS和RTOP观察协议为基础,轻松、可靠地衡量各种层面的改良教学实践。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015 Summer;14(2). doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-10-0168.
7
Research-based implementation of peer instruction: a literature review.基于研究的同伴教学实施:文献综述
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015 Mar 2;14(1):es3. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-11-0198.
8
Understanding clicker discussions: student reasoning and the impact of instructional cues.理解点击器讨论:学生推理及教学提示的影响
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013 Winter;12(4):645-54. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-05-0090.
9
The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): a new instrument to characterize university STEM classroom practices.本科理工科课堂观察协议(COPUS):一种描述大学理工科课堂教学实践的新工具。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013 Winter;12(4):618-27. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154.
10
Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions.同伴讨论为何能提高学生在课堂概念问题上的表现。
Science. 2009 Jan 2;323(5910):122-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1165919.