From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Anesthesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Anesth Analg. 2019 Oct;124(9):1045-1050. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003451.
In 2015, the National Partnership for Maternal Safety (NPMS) developed an obstetric hemorrhage consensus bundle to provide birthing facilities in the United States with consistent, validated practice guidelines for postpartum hemorrhage management. The process of implementing each bundle element at a large tertiary labor and delivery unit has not been described; we sought to identify practice deficiencies and perceived barriers to bundle implementation among multidisciplinary providers.
We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional, consensus-building study based on the Delphi method. A multidisciplinary expert panel comprised of anesthesiologists, obstetricians, nurses, and surgical technicians was assembled and participated in 4 sequential questionnaires. The first round identified bundle elements that experts determined as not currently adequate and perceived barriers to implementation. The second round established prioritization of elements within each professional group; and the third round ranked the elements with at least 60% agreement on feasibility of implementation and positive impact on patient care. The last round revealed responses across all 4 professional groups to derive a final consensus. Descriptive statistics were performed.
A total of 38 experts completed the study (11 anesthesiologists, 11 obstetricians, 10 nurses, and 6 surgical technicians). While all 13 (100%) NPMS obstetric bundle elements were described as deficient in our labor and delivery unit by a provider in at least 1 discipline, consensus among at least 3 of the 4 disciplines was achieved for 6 element deficiencies. Barriers to implementation were determined. The initiatives that achieved consensus as possessing high patient impact and implementation feasibility were protocol-driven management, unit-based simulation drills, blood loss quantification, and team huddles and debriefings.
The NPMS obstetric hemorrhage bundle was created to help guide practice and systems improvement for US birthing facilities. The Delphi method enabled identification of deficient elements and perceived barriers to element implementation, as well as group consensus on elements with highest patient impact and feasibility. Multidisciplinary group consensus can identify deficiencies and promote tangible, quality improvements in a large, tertiary-care labor and delivery unit. Institutions may utilize our described technique to guide implementation of future care bundles.
2015 年,美国母婴安全国家合作伙伴关系(NPMS)制定了一份产科出血共识包,为美国的分娩机构提供产后出血管理的一致、经过验证的实践指南。在大型三级分娩单位实施每个捆绑包元素的过程尚未描述;我们试图确定多学科提供者实施捆绑包实施过程中的实践缺陷和感知障碍。
我们进行了一项基于德尔菲法的前瞻性、横断面、共识建立研究。一个由麻醉师、产科医生、护士和外科技术员组成的多学科专家小组被召集起来,并参加了 4 轮顺序问卷调查。第一轮确定了专家认为目前不足和实施障碍的捆绑包元素。第二轮确定了每个专业组内元素的优先级;第三轮根据实施的可行性和对患者护理的积极影响对元素进行了排名,至少有 60%的专家同意。第四轮揭示了所有 4 个专业组的反应,得出最终共识。进行了描述性统计。
共有 38 名专家完成了这项研究(11 名麻醉师、11 名产科医生、10 名护士和 6 名外科技术员)。虽然至少有 1 个学科的提供者认为我们的分娩单位的 13 个(100%)NPMS 产科捆绑包元素存在缺陷,但至少有 4 个学科中的 3 个学科达成了 6 个元素缺陷的共识。确定了实施障碍。被认为对患者具有高影响和实施可行性的举措是基于方案的管理、基于单位的模拟演练、失血量量化以及团队围堵和汇报。
NPMS 产科出血捆绑包旨在帮助指导美国分娩机构的实践和系统改进。德尔菲法使我们能够确定有缺陷的元素和实施元素的感知障碍,以及对具有最高患者影响和可行性的元素的小组共识。多学科小组共识可以确定缺陷,并促进大型三级护理分娩单位的切实、高质量改进。各机构可以利用我们所描述的技术来指导未来护理捆绑包的实施。