Suppr超能文献

《国家和国际产科患者血液管理指南:定性综述》

National and International Guidelines for Patient Blood Management in Obstetrics: A Qualitative Review.

作者信息

Shaylor Ruth, Weiniger Carolyn F, Austin Naola, Tzabazis Alexander, Shander Aryeh, Goodnough Lawrence T, Butwick Alexander J

机构信息

From the *Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; †Departments of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; ‡Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine, Pain Management and Hyperbaric Medicine, Englewood Hospital and Medical Center, Englewood, New Jersey; §Departments of Anesthesiology, Medicine and Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; and ‖Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2017 Jan;124(1):216-232. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001473.

Abstract

In developed countries, rates of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) requiring transfusion have been increasing. As a result, anesthesiologists are being increasingly called upon to assist with the management of patients with severe PPH. First responders, including anesthesiologists, may adopt Patient Blood Management (PBM) recommendations of national societies or other agencies. However, it is unclear whether national and international obstetric societies' PPH guidelines account for contemporary PBM practices. We performed a qualitative review of PBM recommendations published by the following national obstetric societies and international groups: the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, United Kingdom; The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; The Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada; an interdisciplinary group of experts from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, an international multidisciplinary consensus group, and the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. We also reviewed a PPH bundle, published by The National Partnership for Maternal Safety. On the basis of our review, we identified important differences in national and international societies' recommendations for transfusion and PBM. In the light of PBM advances in the nonobstetric setting, obstetric societies should determine the applicability of these recommendations in the obstetric setting. Partnerships among medical, obstetric, and anesthetic societies may also help standardize transfusion and PBM guidelines in obstetrics.

摘要

在发达国家,需要输血的产后出血(PPH)发生率一直在上升。因此,麻醉医生越来越多地被要求协助管理严重PPH患者。包括麻醉医生在内的急救人员可能会采用国家学会或其他机构的患者血液管理(PBM)建议。然而,尚不清楚国家和国际产科学会的PPH指南是否考虑了当代的PBM实践。我们对以下国家产科学会和国际组织发布的PBM建议进行了定性综述:美国妇产科医师学会;英国皇家妇产科学院;澳大利亚和新西兰皇家妇产科医师学院;加拿大妇产科医师学会;来自奥地利、德国和瑞士的跨学科专家小组、一个国际多学科共识小组以及法国妇产科医师学院。我们还审查了国家孕产妇安全伙伴关系发布的一份PPH综合方案。根据我们的综述,我们确定了国家和国际学会在输血和PBM建议方面的重要差异。鉴于非产科环境中PBM的进展,产科学会应确定这些建议在产科环境中的适用性。医学、产科和麻醉学会之间的合作也可能有助于规范产科输血和PBM指南。

相似文献

2
Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Comprehensive Review of Guidelines.产后出血:指南综合综述
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2022 Nov;77(11):665-682. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000001061.
3
Prevention and management of postpartum hemorrhage: a comparison of 4 national guidelines.产后出血的预防与管理:4项国家指南的比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;213(1):76.e1-76.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.023. Epub 2015 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

6
Placenta Accreta Spectrum.胎盘植入谱系疾病
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jul 1;142(1):31-50. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005229. Epub 2023 Jun 7.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验