• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一份关于养老院质量与信息技术的国家报告:两年趋势

A National Report of Nursing Home Quality and Information Technology: Two-Year Trends.

作者信息

Alexander Gregory L, Madsen Richard

机构信息

University of Missouri, Sinclair School of Nursing, Columbia (Dr Alexander); and University of Missouri, Medical Research Office, Columbia (Dr Madsen).

出版信息

J Nurs Care Qual. 2018 Jul/Sep;33(3):200-207. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000328.

DOI:10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000328
PMID:29787455
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7268780/
Abstract

Health Information Technology is transforming healthcare delivery. This research report describes 2 year trends in technology adoption, called information technology sophistication, defined as capabilities, extent of use, and integration of technology. Trends are identified using a validated annual survey. In Year 1, 815 facilities participated in the survey; in Year 2, 484 nursing homes repeated the survey representing every US state. Statistically significant increases in information technology sophistication were found in resident care and total scores. Sample homes tended to be smaller and from small town/rural areas. There were more information technology gains than losses in technology sophistication over the 2 years in the sample. Significant correlations were identified between differences in information technology sophistication and 12 different quality measures.

摘要

健康信息技术正在改变医疗服务的提供方式。本研究报告描述了技术采用方面的两年趋势,即信息技术成熟度,其定义为技术的能力、使用范围和整合情况。通过一项经过验证的年度调查来确定趋势。在第1年,有815家机构参与了调查;在第2年,484家养老院再次参与了调查,这些养老院代表了美国的各个州。在居民护理和总分方面发现信息技术成熟度有统计学上的显著提高。样本养老院往往规模较小,且来自小镇/农村地区。在两年时间里,样本中的养老院在技术成熟度方面信息技术有所提升的比下降的更多。在信息技术成熟度差异与12种不同质量指标之间发现了显著的相关性。

相似文献

1
A National Report of Nursing Home Quality and Information Technology: Two-Year Trends.一份关于养老院质量与信息技术的国家报告:两年趋势
J Nurs Care Qual. 2018 Jul/Sep;33(3):200-207. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000328.
2
Forecasting Content and Stage in a Nursing Home Information Technology Maturity Instrument Using a Delphi Method.使用德尔菲法预测养老院信息技术成熟度工具中的内容和阶段。
J Med Syst. 2020 Feb 5;44(3):60. doi: 10.1007/s10916-020-1528-6.
3
Low-Quality Nursing Homes Were More Likely Than Other Nursing Homes To Be Bought Or Sold By Chains In 1993-2010.1993年至2010年期间,低质量疗养院比其他疗养院更有可能被连锁机构收购或出售。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 May 1;35(5):907-14. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1042.
4
Public/private ownership and quality of care: Evidence from Danish nursing homes.公有/私有产权与医疗服务质量:来自丹麦养老院的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Nov;216:41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.029. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
5
Nursing home consumer complaints and their potential role in assessing quality of care.养老院消费者投诉及其在评估护理质量方面的潜在作用。
Med Care. 2005 Feb;43(2):102-11. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200502000-00003.
6
A National Report of Nursing Home Information Technology Adoption and Quality Measures.一份关于养老院信息技术采用与质量指标的国家报告。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2016 Jul-Sep;31(3):201-6. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000187.
7
The State of Nursing Home Information Technology Sophistication in Rural and Nonrural US Markets.美国农村和非农村市场养老院信息技术成熟度现状。
J Rural Health. 2017 Jun;33(3):266-274. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12188. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
8
Persistent geographic variations in availability and quality of nursing home care in the United States: 1996 to 2016.美国养老院护理服务的供应和质量在地域上长期存在差异:1996 年至 2016 年。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Apr 11;19(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1117-z.
9
Quality focus: South Dakota nursing homes join state and national quality care collaborative.质量重点:南达科他州的疗养院加入州和全国性的优质护理协作项目。
S D Med. 2013 Apr;66(4):157.
10
Analyzing Change in Nursing Home Information Technology Sophistication: A 2-Year Survey.分析养老院信息技术成熟度的变化:一项为期两年的调查。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2017 Jan 1;43(1):17-21. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20161215-05.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis and Improvement of Nursing Quality Based on Standardized Information Integration.基于标准化信息整合的护理质量分析与改进
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Feb 11;2022:9172416. doi: 10.1155/2022/9172416. eCollection 2022.
2
What is the level of information technology maturity in Ontario's long-term care homes? A cross-sectional survey study protocol.安大略省长期护理院的信息技术成熟度如何?一项横断面调查研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 10;13(2):e064745. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064745.
3
The Association Between Nursing Home Information Technology Maturity and Urinary Tract Infection Among Long-Term Residents.养老院信息技术成熟度与长期居民尿路感染之间的关联。
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Jul;41(7):1695-1701. doi: 10.1177/07334648221082024. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
4
Examining Nursing Home Information Technology Maturity and Antibiotic Use Among Long-Term Care Residents.检查养老院信息技术成熟度和长期护理居民的抗生素使用情况。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Jun;23(6):1019-1024.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.01.052. Epub 2022 Feb 13.
5
Digital technologies to support people living with dementia in the care home setting to engage in meaningful occupations: protocol for a scoping review.支持养老院中痴呆症患者参与有意义活动的数字技术:一项范围综述的方案
Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 21;10(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01715-4.
6
Qualitative Validation of the Nursing Home IT Maturity Staging Model.养老机构 IT 成熟度阶段模型的定性验证。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2020 Jul 1;46(7):47-54. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20200605-08.
7
Health Data Sharing in US Nursing Homes: A Mixed Methods Study.美国养老院中的健康数据共享:一项混合方法研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 May;22(5):1052-1059. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
8
Exploring Resident Care Information Technology Use and Nursing Home Quality.探索居民护理信息技术的使用与养老院质量。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2020 Apr 1;46(4):15-20. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20200303-02.
9
A National Assessment of Access to Technology Among Nursing Home Residents: A Secondary Analysis.一项针对疗养院居民技术获取情况的全国性评估:二次分析
JMIR Aging. 2019 Mar 5;2(1):e11449. doi: 10.2196/11449.
10
Ternary Trends in Nursing Home Information Technology and Quality Measures in the United States.美国养老院信息技术与质量指标的三元趋势
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Oct;39(10):1134-1143. doi: 10.1177/0733464819862928. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

本文引用的文献

1
QuickStats: Percentage of Residential Care Communities* that Use Electronic Health Records, by Community Bed Size - United States, 2016 and 2020.快速统计数据:2016年和2020年按社区床位规模划分的使用电子健康记录的寄宿护理社区*的百分比 - 美国
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Sep 30;71(39):1248. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7139a7.
2
The Imperative of Solving Nurses' Usability Problems With Health Information Technology.解决护士在健康信息技术方面可用性问题的必要性。
J Nurs Adm. 2018 Apr;48(4):191-196. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000598.
3
Analyzing Change in Nursing Home Information Technology Sophistication: A 2-Year Survey.分析养老院信息技术成熟度的变化:一项为期两年的调查。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2017 Jan 1;43(1):17-21. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20161215-05.
4
Changes in the quality of care during progress from stage 1 to stage 2 of Meaningful Use.从有意义使用的第1阶段进展到第2阶段期间护理质量的变化。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):394-397. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw127.
5
A National Report of Nursing Home Information Technology Adoption and Quality Measures.一份关于养老院信息技术采用与质量指标的国家报告。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2016 Jul-Sep;31(3):201-6. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000187.
6
A national report of nursing home information technology: year 1 results.一份疗养院信息技术的全国报告:第一年的结果。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):67-73. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw051. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
7
Nursing-Centric Technology and Usability A Call to Action.以护理为中心的技术与可用性:行动呼吁
Comput Inform Nurs. 2015 Aug;33(8):325-32. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000180.
8
Adoption factors associated with electronic health record among long-term care facilities: a systematic review.长期护理机构中与电子健康记录相关的采用因素:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 28;5(1):e006615. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006615.
9
A regional assessment of information technology sophistication in Missouri nursing homes.密苏里州养老院信息技术成熟度的区域评估。
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2010 Aug;11(3):214-25. doi: 10.1177/1527154410386616. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
10
Information technology sophistication in nursing homes.养老院中的信息技术成熟度。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2009 Jul;10(6):398-407. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.02.001. Epub 2009 May 29.