From the Division of Trauma and General Surgery, Department of Surgery (X.C., M.R.R., A.B.P., T.R.B., J.L.S., J.B.B.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (M.G.L.), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jul;85(1):174-181. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001935.
Trauma is a time sensitive disease. Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) have shown benefit over ground emergency medical services (GEMS), which may be related to reduced prehospital time. The distance at which this time benefit emerges depends on many factors that can vary across regions. Our objective was to determine the threshold distance at which HEMS has shorter prehospital time than GEMS under different conditions.
Patients in the Pennsylvania trauma registry 2000 to 2013 were included. Distance between zip centroid and trauma center was calculated using straight-line distance for HEMS and driving distance from geographic information systems network analysis for GEMS. Contrast margins from linear regression identified the threshold distance at which HEMS had a significantly lower prehospital time than GEMS, indicated by nonoverlapping 95% confidence intervals. The effect of peak traffic times and adverse weather on the threshold distance was evaluated. Geographic effects across EMS regions were also evaluated.
A total of 144,741 patients were included with 19% transported by HEMS. Overall, HEMS became faster than GEMS at 7.7 miles from the trauma center (p = 0.043). Helicopter emergency medical services became faster at 6.5 miles during peak traffic (p = 0.025) compared with 7.9 miles during off-peak traffic (p = 0.048). Adverse weather increased the distance at which HEMS was faster to 17.1 miles (p = 0.046) from 7.3 miles in clear weather (p = 0.036). Significant variation occurred across EMS regions, with threshold distances ranging from 5.4 to 35.3 miles. There was an inverse but non-significant relationship between urban population and threshold distance across EMS regions (ρ, -0.351, p = 0.28).
This is the first study to demonstrate that traffic, weather, and geographic region significantly impact the threshold distance at which HEMS are faster than GEMS. Helicopter emergency medical services was faster at shorter distances during peak traffic while adverse weather increased this distance. The threshold distance varied widely across geographic region. These factors must be considered to guide appropriate HEMS triage protocols.
Therapeutic, level IV.
创伤是一种时间敏感型疾病。直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)比地面紧急医疗服务(GEMS)更有优势,这可能与院前时间的减少有关。这种时间优势出现的距离取决于许多因素,这些因素在不同地区可能会有所不同。我们的目标是确定在不同条件下,HEMS 的院前时间比 GEMS 短的阈值距离。
纳入宾夕法尼亚州创伤登记处 2000 年至 2013 年的患者。使用直线距离计算 HEMS 中邮政编码中心和创伤中心之间的距离,使用地理信息系统网络分析的驾驶距离计算 GEMS 中两者之间的距离。线性回归的对比边际确定了 HEMS 的院前时间比 GEMS 显著缩短的阈值距离,这表明 95%置信区间不重叠。还评估了高峰交通时间和恶劣天气对阈值距离的影响。还评估了 EMS 区域之间的地理影响。
共纳入 144741 例患者,其中 19%由 HEMS 转运。总体而言,HEMS 距离创伤中心 7.7 英里时比 GEMS 更快(p = 0.043)。在高峰交通时间,HEMS 比非高峰交通时间(p = 0.048)更快,速度优势出现在距离创伤中心 6.5 英里处(p = 0.025)。恶劣天气将 HEMS 更快的距离增加到 17.1 英里(p = 0.046),而天气晴朗时则为 7.3 英里(p = 0.036)。EMS 区域之间存在显著差异,阈值距离范围为 5.4 至 35.3 英里。EMS 区域之间的城市人口与阈值距离呈负相关但无统计学意义(ρ,-0.351,p = 0.28)。
这是第一项表明交通、天气和地理区域显著影响 HEMS 比 GEMS 更快的阈值距离的研究。HEMS 在高峰交通时间的短距离内更快,而恶劣天气则增加了这段距离。阈值距离在地理区域之间差异很大。这些因素必须加以考虑,以指导适当的 HEMS 分诊协议。
治疗,IV 级。