Brown Joshua B, Gestring Mark L, Guyette Francis X, Rosengart Matthew R, Stassen Nicole A, Forsythe Raquel M, Billiar Timothy R, Peitzman Andrew B, Sperry Jason L
*Division of General Surgery and Trauma, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA†Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY‡Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Ann Surg. 2016 Aug;264(2):378-85. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001496.
The aim of this study was to develop and internally validate a triage score that can identify trauma patients at the scene who would potentially benefit from helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS).
Although survival benefits have been shown at the population level, identification of patients most likely to benefit from HEMS transport is imperative to justify the risks and cost of this intervention.
Retrospective cohort study of subjects undergoing scene HEMS or ground emergency medical services (GEMS) in the National Trauma Databank (2007-2012). Data were split into training and validation sets. Subjects were grouped by triage criteria in the training set and regression used to determine which criteria had a survival benefit associated with HEMS. Points were assigned to these criteria to develop the Air Medical Prehospital Triage (AMPT) score. The score was applied in the validation set to determine whether subjects triaged to HEMS had a survival benefit when actually transported by helicopter.
There were 2,086,137 subjects included. Criteria identified for inclusion in the AMPT score included GCS <14, respiratory rate <10 or >29, flail chest, hemo/pneumothorax, paralysis, and multisystem trauma. The optimal cutoff for triage to HEMS was ≥2 points. In subjects triaged to HEMS, actual transport by HEMS was associated with an increased odds of survival (AOR 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-1.36, P < 0.01). In subjects triaged to GEMS, actual transport mode was not associated with survival (AOR 1.04; 95% CI 0.97-1.11, P = 0.20).
The AMPT score identifies patients with improved survival following HEMS transport and should be considered in air medical triage protocols.
本研究的目的是开发并在内部验证一种分诊评分系统,该系统能够在现场识别出可能从直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)中获益的创伤患者。
尽管在人群层面已显示出生存获益,但确定最有可能从HEMS转运中获益的患者对于证明这种干预措施的风险和成本是至关重要的。
对国家创伤数据库(2007 - 2012年)中接受现场HEMS或地面紧急医疗服务(GEMS)的受试者进行回顾性队列研究。数据被分为训练集和验证集。在训练集中根据分诊标准对受试者进行分组,并使用回归分析来确定哪些标准与HEMS的生存获益相关。为这些标准分配分数以开发空中医疗院前分诊(AMPT)评分。将该评分应用于验证集,以确定被分诊到HEMS的受试者在实际通过直升机转运时是否有生存获益。
共纳入2,086,137名受试者。确定纳入AMPT评分的标准包括格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)<14、呼吸频率<10或>29、连枷胸、血胸/气胸、瘫痪和多系统创伤。分诊到HEMS的最佳临界值为≥2分。在被分诊到HEMS的受试者中,实际通过HEMS转运与生存几率增加相关(调整后比值比[AOR] 1.28;95%置信区间[CI] 1.21 - 1.36,P<0.01)。在被分诊到GEMS的受试者中,实际转运方式与生存无关(AOR 1.04;95% CI 0.97 - 1.11,P = 0.20)。
AMPT评分可识别出在HEMS转运后生存情况改善的患者,应在航空医疗分诊方案中予以考虑。