• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

惊恐和过度通气与心因性非癫痫性发作的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The association of panic and hyperventilation with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

University of Melbourne, Department of Psychiatry, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.

Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia; The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.

出版信息

Seizure. 2018 Jul;59:108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.seizure.2018.05.007
PMID:29787922
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures (PNES) are events that appear epileptic but are instead thought to have a psychological origin. Increased rates of several psychiatric disorders have been reported in PNES, including anxiety and panic disorders. Some theories suggest panic and/or hyperventilation have aetiological roles in PNES, though these remain unproven.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of associations of panic and hyperventilation with PNES using Ovid Medline and PubMed, and a meta-analysis where appropriate.

RESULTS

We found eighteen studies reporting rates of panic in PNES and eight studies reporting hyperventilation. The reported rate of panic attacks in PNES ranged from 17% to 83%, with physical symptoms more commonly reported, and affective symptoms less so. 'Dizziness or light-headedness' was found to be more prevalent than 'fear of dying' by random-effects meta-analysis (68% vs. 23%). A proportion meta-analysis found a weighted occurrence of 20% of panic disorder in PNES. A pooled meta-analytic rate of PNES events following voluntary hyperventilation induction was 30%, while the clinically observed rates of peri-ictal hyperventilation in PNES without induction varied from 15 to 46%.

CONCLUSIONS

Previous studies have reported moderate rates of association of panic in PNES, though the proportions varied considerably across the literature, with physical symptoms more commonly reported than affective. Hyperventilation is an effective inducer of PNES events in a minority, and can be observed occurring in a minority of patients without induction. These results support an important, albeit not essential, role for panic and hyperventilation in the pathogenesis of PNES events.

摘要

简介

心因性非癫痫性发作(PNES)是一种表现为癫痫样但被认为具有心理起源的事件。PNES 中已报道多种精神障碍的发生率增加,包括焦虑症和惊恐障碍。一些理论表明惊恐和/或过度通气在 PNES 中有病因作用,但这些仍未得到证实。

方法

我们使用 Ovid Medline 和 PubMed 对惊恐和过度通气与 PNES 的关联进行了系统综述,并在适当的情况下进行了荟萃分析。

结果

我们发现了 18 项报告 PNES 中惊恐发作率的研究和 8 项报告过度通气的研究。PNES 中惊恐发作的报告率从 17%到 83%不等,更常见的是躯体症状,而情感症状较少。随机效应荟萃分析发现,“头晕或头晕”比“害怕死亡”更为普遍(68%对 23%)。比例荟萃分析发现,PNES 中惊恐障碍的加权发生率为 20%。自愿过度通气诱导后 PNES 事件的汇总荟萃分析发生率为 30%,而无诱导时 PNES 中peri-ictal 过度通气的临床观察发生率从 15%到 46%不等。

结论

以前的研究报告了惊恐与 PNES 中度相关的比例,尽管文献中的比例差异很大,躯体症状比情感症状更常见。过度通气在少数人中是 PNES 事件的有效诱导剂,并且在没有诱导的情况下也可以观察到少数患者发生过度通气。这些结果支持惊恐和过度通气在 PNES 事件发病机制中具有重要但不是必要的作用。

相似文献

1
The association of panic and hyperventilation with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.惊恐和过度通气与心因性非癫痫性发作的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Seizure. 2018 Jul;59:108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 19.
2
Antidepressants versus placebo for panic disorder in adults.成人惊恐障碍患者使用抗抑郁药与安慰剂的对照研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 5;4(4):CD010676. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010676.pub2.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.拉莫三嗪与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 28;6(6):CD001031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001031.pub4.
5
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.抗癫痫药物单药治疗癫痫:一项个体参与者数据的网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub4.
6
Inhaled mannitol for cystic fibrosis.吸入用甘露醇治疗囊性纤维化。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 9;2(2):CD008649. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008649.pub3.
7
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
8
Treatments for seizures in catamenial (menstrual-related) epilepsy.月经性(与月经相关)癫痫发作的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 16;9(9):CD013225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013225.pub3.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
Clinical judgement by primary care physicians for the diagnosis of all-cause dementia or cognitive impairment in symptomatic people.初级保健医生对有症状人群进行全因痴呆或认知障碍诊断的临床判断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 16;6(6):CD012558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012558.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Respiratory sensitivity is reduced in functional neurological disorder and associated with higher somatoform dissociation.功能性神经障碍患者的呼吸敏感性降低,且与较高的躯体形式解离有关。
Brain Commun. 2025 Jul 31;7(4):fcaf283. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf283. eCollection 2025.
2
Dissimilar Changes in Serum Cortisol after Epileptic and Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures: A Promising Biomarker in the Differential Diagnosis of Paroxysmal Events?癫痫性和非癫痫性阵发性事件后血清皮质醇的不同变化:鉴别诊断阵发性事件的有前途的生物标志物?
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 5;25(13):7387. doi: 10.3390/ijms25137387.
3
Understanding Functional Neurological Disorder: Recent Insights and Diagnostic Challenges.
理解功能性神经障碍:最新见解与诊断挑战
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Apr 18;25(8):4470. doi: 10.3390/ijms25084470.
4
An investigation into mothers' experiences of their children's functional tic-like behaviour and tic attacks.母亲对其子女功能性抽动样行为和抽动发作的体验调查。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0292742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292742. eCollection 2024.
5
Dissociative seizures in the emergency room: room for improvement.急诊室中的分离性发作:有待改进。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 13;95(4):294-299. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-332063.
6
Triggers in functional motor disorder: a clinical feature distinct from precipitating factors.功能性运动障碍中的触发因素:一种有别于诱发因素的临床特征。
J Neurol. 2022 Jul;269(7):3892-3898. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11102-1. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
7
Functional neurological disorder: new subtypes and shared mechanisms.功能性神经障碍:新亚型和共同机制。
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Jun;21(6):537-550. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00422-1. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
8
The psychophysiology of the sigh: I: The sigh from the physiological perspective.叹息的心理生理学:I:从生理学角度看叹息。
Biol Psychol. 2022 Apr;170:108313. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108313. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
9
Epilepsy and other seizure disorders in acute psychiatric inpatients.急性精神病住院患者中的癫痫和其他发作性疾病。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 15;21(1):626. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03619-y.
10
Functional seizures are not less important than epilepsy.功能性癫痫发作并不比癫痫本身的重要性低。
Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2021 Oct 21;16:100495. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2021.100495. eCollection 2021.