• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

讨论要点:调节圈不会提高言语识别率,但能减少聆听努力度。

Talking points: A modulating circle reduces listening effort without improving speech recognition.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Carleton College, Northfield, MN, USA.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb;26(1):291-297. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1489-7.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-018-1489-7
PMID:29790122
Abstract

Speech recognition is improved when the acoustic input is accompanied by visual cues provided by a talking face (Erber in Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12(2), 423-425 1969; Sumby & Pollack in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26(2), 212-215, 1954). One way that the visual signal facilitates speech recognition is by providing the listener with information about fine phonetic detail that complements information from the auditory signal. However, given that degraded face stimuli can still improve speech recognition accuracy (Munhall et al. in Perception & Psychophysics, 66(4), 574-583, 2004), and static or moving shapes can improve speech detection accuracy (Bernstein et al. in Speech Communication, 44(1/4), 5-18, 2004), aspects of the visual signal other than fine phonetic detail may also contribute to the perception of speech. In two experiments, we show that a modulating circle providing information about the onset, offset, and acoustic amplitude envelope of the speech does not improve recognition of spoken sentences (Experiment 1) or words (Experiment 2), but does reduce the effort necessary to recognize speech. These results suggest that although fine phonetic detail may be required for the visual signal to benefit speech recognition, low-level features of the visual signal may function to reduce the cognitive effort associated with processing speech.

摘要

当声学输入伴随着说话人脸提供的视觉提示时,语音识别会得到改善(Erber 在《言语听觉研究杂志》,12(2),423-425 1969 年;Sumby & Pollack 在《美国声学学会杂志》,26(2),212-215,1954 年)。视觉信号促进语音识别的一种方式是为听者提供有关精细语音细节的信息,这些信息补充了来自听觉信号的信息。然而,即使是退化的人脸刺激也可以提高语音识别的准确性(Munhall 等人在《感知与心理物理学》,66(4),574-583,2004 年),静态或移动的形状可以提高语音检测的准确性(Bernstein 等人在《语音通信》,44(1/4),5-18,2004 年),除了精细的语音细节之外,视觉信号的其他方面也可能有助于语音感知。在两项实验中,我们表明,一个调制圆提供有关语音起始、结束和声学幅度包络的信息,不会提高对口语句子(实验 1)或单词(实验 2)的识别,但确实减少了识别语音所需的努力。这些结果表明,尽管视觉信号可能需要精细的语音细节才能受益于语音识别,但视觉信号的低水平特征可能有助于减少与处理语音相关的认知努力。

相似文献

1
Talking points: A modulating circle reduces listening effort without improving speech recognition.讨论要点:调节圈不会提高言语识别率,但能减少聆听努力度。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb;26(1):291-297. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1489-7.
2
Talking Points: A Modulating Circle Increases Listening Effort Without Improving Speech Recognition in Young Adults.讨论要点:在年轻成年人中,调节环路增加了聆听努力程度,但并未提高言语识别能力。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Jun;27(3):536-543. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01713-y.
3
The effects of temporal cues, point-light displays, and faces on speech identification and listening effort.时线索、点光显示和面部对言语识别和听力努力的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 29;18(11):e0290826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290826. eCollection 2023.
4
Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.老年人在噪声中识别视听语音比年轻人需要更多的听力努力。
Int J Audiol. 2011 Nov;50(11):786-92. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.599870. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
5
Errors on a Speech-in-Babble Sentence Recognition Test Reveal Individual Differences in Acoustic Phonetic Perception and Babble Misallocations.嘈杂语音句子识别测试中的错误揭示了声学语音感知和嘈杂语音误分配方面的个体差异。
Ear Hear. 2021 May/Jun;42(3):673-690. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001020.
6
Learning to use an artificial visual cue in speech identification.学习在语音识别中使用人工视觉提示。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Oct;128(4):2138-49. doi: 10.1121/1.3479537.
7
Determining the influence of Gaussian blurring on inversion effects with talking faces.确定高斯模糊对有说话面部的反转效应的影响。
Percept Psychophys. 2002 Aug;64(6):932-44. doi: 10.3758/bf03196797.
8
Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.外在认知负荷会影响高低预测度句子中的口语词汇识别。
Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):378-389. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000493.
9
Low-frequency fine-structure cues allow for the online use of lexical stress during spoken-word recognition in spectrally degraded speech.低频精细结构线索有助于在频谱退化语音的口语单词识别过程中在线利用词汇重音。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Jan;141(1):373. doi: 10.1121/1.4972569.
10
How visual cues to speech rate influence speech perception.言语速度的视觉提示如何影响言语感知。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Oct;73(10):1523-1536. doi: 10.1177/1747021820914564. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
How to fix your scientific coding errors.如何修复你的科学编码错误。
Nature. 2022 Feb;602(7895):172-173. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-00217-0.
2
Putting the Self in Self-Correction: Findings From the Loss-of-Confidence Project.将自我置于自我修正之中:信心丧失项目的发现。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Nov;16(6):1255-1269. doi: 10.1177/1745691620964106. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
3
The visual speech head start improves perception and reduces superior temporal cortex responses to auditory speech.视觉言语启动可改善听觉言语感知,并降低颞上皮质对听觉言语的反应。

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring Listening Effort: Convergent Validity, Sensitivity, and Links With Cognitive and Personality Measures.测量听力努力程度:聚合效度、敏感性以及与认知和人格测量的关系。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Jun 19;61(6):1463-1486. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0257.
2
Behavioral Assessment of Listening Effort Using a Dual-Task Paradigm.使用双任务范式评估听力努力程度。
Trends Hear. 2017 Jan;21:2331216516687287. doi: 10.1177/2331216516687287.
3
Listening Effort in Younger and Older Adults: A Comparison of Auditory-Only and Auditory-Visual Presentations.
Elife. 2019 Aug 8;8:e48116. doi: 10.7554/eLife.48116.
年轻人和老年人的听觉努力:纯听觉与视听呈现方式的比较
Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):62S-8S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000322.
4
Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).听力障碍与认知能量:理解费力听力的框架(FUEL)
Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37 Suppl 1:5S-27S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312.
5
The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.在测量听力努力的双任务范式中改变次要任务的效果。
Ear Hear. 2014 Nov-Dec;35(6):611-22. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000055.
6
Enhancing speech intelligibility: interactions among context, modality, speech style, and masker.提高言语可懂度:语境、模态、言语风格和掩蔽音之间的相互作用。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Oct;57(5):1908-18. doi: 10.1044/JSLHR-H-13-0076.
7
The effect of hearing aid noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults.助听器降噪对听力受损成年人听力努力的影响。
Ear Hear. 2014 Nov-Dec;35(6):600-10. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000028.
8
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
9
Visual information can hinder working memory processing of speech.视觉信息会阻碍工作记忆处理言语。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Aug;56(4):1120-32. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0033). Epub 2013 Jun 19.
10
Effects of speech clarity on recognition memory for spoken sentences.言语清晰度对句子识别记忆的影响。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e43753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043753. Epub 2012 Sep 7.