University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1468-1487. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1478-x.
Prior studies of noun-noun compound word processing have provided insight into the human capacity for conceptual combination (Gagné and Shoben Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(1), 71 1997; Spalding, Gagné, Mullaly & Ji Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft, 17, 283-315 2010). These studies conclude that relational interpretations of compound words are proposed and appraised by the language system during online word recognition. However, little is known about how the capacity for creating new meanings from existing conceptual units develops within an individual mind. Though current theories imply that individual relational knowledge about the combinability of concepts develops as language experience accumulates, this hypothesis has not been previously tested experimentally. Here, we addressed this hypothesis in a task that assesses individual relational knowledge of English compound words. We report that greater experience with printed language shapes relational knowledge of compound words in two ways. Firstly, individuals with more experience with printed language were able to select a greater number of possible relational meanings for individual compound words. Secondly, individuals with greater experience with printed language were also more precise about which relational meaning was the most semantically plausible out of all possible meanings. Our results confirm that language experience affects an individual's ability to use relational knowledge in order to combine conceptual units. Our findings offer further support for the Lexical Quality Hypothesis (Perfetti, 2007), which states that lexical representations of words become simultaneously more flexible and precise as a result of repeated exposure to their orthographic forms in language usage.
先前关于名词-名词复合词处理的研究为人类概念组合能力提供了深入了解(Gagné 和 Shoben Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,23(1),71 1997;Spalding,Gagné,Mullaly & Ji Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft,17,283-315 2010)。这些研究得出的结论是,在在线单词识别过程中,语言系统会提出和评估复合词的关系解释。然而,对于个体如何从现有概念单元中发展出新的意义理解能力,我们知之甚少。虽然当前的理论暗示,随着语言经验的积累,个体对概念组合的关系知识会不断发展,但这一假设尚未经过先前的实验检验。在这里,我们在一项评估英语复合词个体关系知识的任务中解决了这一假设。我们报告说,更多的印刷语言经验会以两种方式塑造复合词的关系知识。首先,具有更多印刷语言经验的个体能够为单个复合词选择更多可能的关系意义。其次,具有更多印刷语言经验的个体在所有可能的意义中,也更能准确地选择最符合语义的关系意义。我们的结果证实,语言经验会影响个体运用关系知识来组合概念单元的能力。我们的发现进一步支持了词汇质量假说(Perfetti,2007),该假说指出,由于在语言使用中反复接触其正字法形式,单词的词汇表示会变得更加灵活和精确。