Frogner Bianca K, Harwood Kenneth, Andrilla C Holly A, Schwartz Malaika, Pines Jesse M
Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington Center for Health Workforce Studies, Seattle, WA.
Health Care Quality Program, The George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53(6):4629-4646. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12984. Epub 2018 May 23.
To compare differences in opioid prescription, health care utilization, and costs among patients with low back pain (LBP) who saw a physical therapist (PT) at the first point of care, at any time during the episode or not at all.
Commercial health insurance claims data, 2009-2013.
Retrospective analyses using two-stage residual inclusion instrumental variable models to estimate rates for opioid prescriptions, imaging services, emergency department visits, hospitalization, and health care costs.
Patients aged 18-64 years with a new primary diagnosis of LBP, living in the northwest United States, were observed over a 1-year period.
Compared to patients who saw a PT later or never, patients who saw a PT first had lower probability of having an opioid prescription (89.4 percent), any advanced imaging services (27.9 percent), and an Emergency Department visit (14.7 percent), yet 19.3 percent higher probability of hospitalization (all p < .001). These patients also had significantly lower out-of-pocket costs, and costs appeared to shift away from outpatient and pharmacy toward provider settings.
When LBP patients saw a PT first, there was lower utilization of high-cost medical services as well as lower opioid use, and cost shifts reflecting the change in utilization.
比较在首次就诊时、在病程中的任何时间或根本未看过物理治疗师(PT)的腰痛(LBP)患者在阿片类药物处方、医疗保健利用和费用方面的差异。
2009 - 2013年商业健康保险理赔数据。
采用两阶段残差纳入工具变量模型进行回顾性分析,以估计阿片类药物处方、影像服务、急诊就诊、住院治疗及医疗保健费用的发生率。
观察了居住在美国西北部、年龄在18 - 64岁且新诊断为原发性LBP的患者,为期1年。
与后来才看PT或从未看过PT的患者相比,首次看PT的患者开具阿片类药物处方的概率较低(89.4%),接受任何高级影像服务的概率较低(27.9%),急诊就诊的概率较低(14.7%),但住院概率高19.3%(所有p < .001)。这些患者的自付费用也显著较低,且费用似乎从门诊和药房转向了医疗机构。
当LBP患者首次看PT时,高成本医疗服务的利用率较低,阿片类药物使用也较少,费用转移反映了利用率的变化。