Suppr超能文献

萘普生联合环苯扎林、羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚或安慰剂治疗急性腰痛的随机临床试验。

Naproxen With Cyclobenzaprine, Oxycodone/Acetaminophen, or Placebo for Treating Acute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.

Medical College, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.

出版信息

JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1572-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13043.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Low back pain (LBP) is responsible for more than 2.5 million visits to US emergency departments (EDs) annually. These patients are usually treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, opioids, or skeletal muscle relaxants, often in combination.

OBJECTIVE

To compare functional outcomes and pain at 1 week and 3 months after an ED visit for acute LBP among patients randomized to a 10-day course of (1) naproxen + placebo; (2) naproxen + cyclobenzaprine; or (3) naproxen + oxycodone/acetaminophen.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized, double-blind, 3-group study was conducted at one urban ED in the Bronx, New York City. Patients who presented with nontraumatic, nonradicular LBP of 2 weeks' duration or less were eligible for enrollment upon ED discharge if they had a score greater than 5 on the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). The RMDQ is a 24-item questionnaire commonly used to measure LBP and related functional impairment on which 0 indicates no functional impairment and 24 indicates maximum impairment. Beginning in April 2012, a total of 2588 patients were approached for enrollment. Of the 323 deemed eligible for participation, 107 were randomized to receive placebo and 108 each to cyclobenzaprine and to oxycodone/acetaminophen. Follow-up was completed in December 2014.

INTERVENTIONS

All participants were given 20 tablets of naproxen, 500 mg, to be taken twice a day. They were randomized to receive either 60 tablets of placebo; cyclobenzaprine, 5 mg; or oxycodone, 5 mg/acetaminophen, 325 mg. Participants were instructed to take 1 or 2 of these tablets every 8 hours, as needed for LBP. They also received a standardized 10-minute LBP educational session prior to discharge.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was improvement in RMDQ between ED discharge and 1 week later.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics were comparable among the 3 groups. At baseline, median RMDQ score in the placebo group was 20 (interquartile range [IQR],17-21), in the cyclobenzaprine group 19 (IQR,17-21), and in the oxycodone/acetaminophen group 20 (IQR,17-22). At 1-week follow-up, the mean RMDQ improvement was 9.8 in the placebo group, 10.1 in the cyclobenzaprine group, and 11.1 in the oxycodone/acetaminophen group. Between-group difference in mean RMDQ improvement for cyclobenzaprine vs placebo was 0.3 (98.3% CI, -2.6 to 3.2; P = .77), for oxycodone/acetaminophen vs placebo, 1.3 (98.3% CI, -1.5 to 4.1; P = .28), and for oxycodone/acetaminophen vs cyclobenzaprine, 0.9 (98.3% CI, -2.1 to 3.9; P = .45).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with acute, nontraumatic, nonradicular LBP presenting to the ED, adding cyclobenzaprine or oxycodone/acetaminophen to naproxen alone did not improve functional outcomes or pain at 1-week follow-up. These findings do not support use of these additional medications in this setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01587274.

摘要

背景

下腰痛(LBP)每年导致超过 250 万次美国急诊部(ED)就诊。这些患者通常接受非甾体抗炎药、对乙酰氨基酚、阿片类药物或骨骼肌松弛剂治疗,通常联合使用。

目的

比较急性 LBP 患者在 ED 就诊后 1 周和 3 个月时的功能结局和疼痛,这些患者随机分为 10 天疗程的 1 组(1)萘普生+安慰剂;(2)萘普生+环苯扎林;或(3)萘普生+羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚。

设计、地点和参与者:这项随机、双盲、3 组研究在纽约市布朗克斯的一家城市 ED 进行。如果患者在 ED 出院时有罗伦兹-莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)评分大于 5,则有资格入选。RMDQ 是一种常用的 24 项问卷,用于测量 LBP 和相关的功能障碍,其中 0 表示没有功能障碍,24 表示最大障碍。从 2012 年 4 月开始,共接触了 2588 名患者进行登记。在 323 名被认为有参与资格的患者中,有 107 名被随机分配接受安慰剂,108 名接受环苯扎林,108 名接受羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚。随访于 2014 年 12 月完成。

干预措施

所有参与者均给予萘普生 20 片,500mg,每日两次服用。他们被随机分配接受安慰剂 60 片;环苯扎林,5mg;或羟考酮,5mg/对乙酰氨基酚,325mg。参与者被指示根据需要每 8 小时服用 1 或 2 片,以缓解 LBP。他们还在出院前接受了 10 分钟的标准化 LBP 教育课程。

主要结果和测量

主要结果是 ED 出院后和 1 周后 RMDQ 的改善。

结果

3 组的人口统计学特征相似。在基线时,安慰剂组的中位数 RMDQ 评分为 20(四分位距[IQR],17-21),环苯扎林组为 19(IQR,17-21),羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚组为 20(IQR,17-22)。在 1 周随访时,安慰剂组的平均 RMDQ 改善为 9.8,环苯扎林组为 10.1,羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚组为 11.1。与安慰剂相比,环苯扎林组的平均 RMDQ 改善差异为 0.3(98.3% CI,-2.6 至 3.2;P=0.77),羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚组为 1.3(98.3% CI,-1.5 至 4.1;P=0.28),羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚组为 0.9(98.3% CI,-2.1 至 3.9;P=0.45)。

结论和相关性

在因急性、非创伤性、非神经根性 LBP 就诊 ED 的患者中,在萘普生单独治疗的基础上加用环苯扎林或羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚并不能改善 1 周时的功能结局或疼痛。这些发现不支持在这种情况下使用这些额外的药物。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT01587274。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验