• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

萘普生联合环苯扎林、羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚或安慰剂治疗急性腰痛的随机临床试验。

Naproxen With Cyclobenzaprine, Oxycodone/Acetaminophen, or Placebo for Treating Acute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.

Medical College, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.

出版信息

JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1572-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13043.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2015.13043
PMID:26501533
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Low back pain (LBP) is responsible for more than 2.5 million visits to US emergency departments (EDs) annually. These patients are usually treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, opioids, or skeletal muscle relaxants, often in combination.

OBJECTIVE

To compare functional outcomes and pain at 1 week and 3 months after an ED visit for acute LBP among patients randomized to a 10-day course of (1) naproxen + placebo; (2) naproxen + cyclobenzaprine; or (3) naproxen + oxycodone/acetaminophen.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized, double-blind, 3-group study was conducted at one urban ED in the Bronx, New York City. Patients who presented with nontraumatic, nonradicular LBP of 2 weeks' duration or less were eligible for enrollment upon ED discharge if they had a score greater than 5 on the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). The RMDQ is a 24-item questionnaire commonly used to measure LBP and related functional impairment on which 0 indicates no functional impairment and 24 indicates maximum impairment. Beginning in April 2012, a total of 2588 patients were approached for enrollment. Of the 323 deemed eligible for participation, 107 were randomized to receive placebo and 108 each to cyclobenzaprine and to oxycodone/acetaminophen. Follow-up was completed in December 2014.

INTERVENTIONS

All participants were given 20 tablets of naproxen, 500 mg, to be taken twice a day. They were randomized to receive either 60 tablets of placebo; cyclobenzaprine, 5 mg; or oxycodone, 5 mg/acetaminophen, 325 mg. Participants were instructed to take 1 or 2 of these tablets every 8 hours, as needed for LBP. They also received a standardized 10-minute LBP educational session prior to discharge.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was improvement in RMDQ between ED discharge and 1 week later.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics were comparable among the 3 groups. At baseline, median RMDQ score in the placebo group was 20 (interquartile range [IQR],17-21), in the cyclobenzaprine group 19 (IQR,17-21), and in the oxycodone/acetaminophen group 20 (IQR,17-22). At 1-week follow-up, the mean RMDQ improvement was 9.8 in the placebo group, 10.1 in the cyclobenzaprine group, and 11.1 in the oxycodone/acetaminophen group. Between-group difference in mean RMDQ improvement for cyclobenzaprine vs placebo was 0.3 (98.3% CI, -2.6 to 3.2; P = .77), for oxycodone/acetaminophen vs placebo, 1.3 (98.3% CI, -1.5 to 4.1; P = .28), and for oxycodone/acetaminophen vs cyclobenzaprine, 0.9 (98.3% CI, -2.1 to 3.9; P = .45).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with acute, nontraumatic, nonradicular LBP presenting to the ED, adding cyclobenzaprine or oxycodone/acetaminophen to naproxen alone did not improve functional outcomes or pain at 1-week follow-up. These findings do not support use of these additional medications in this setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01587274.

摘要

背景

下腰痛(LBP)每年导致超过 250 万次美国急诊部(ED)就诊。这些患者通常接受非甾体抗炎药、对乙酰氨基酚、阿片类药物或骨骼肌松弛剂治疗,通常联合使用。

目的

比较急性 LBP 患者在 ED 就诊后 1 周和 3 个月时的功能结局和疼痛,这些患者随机分为 10 天疗程的 1 组(1)萘普生+安慰剂;(2)萘普生+环苯扎林;或(3)萘普生+羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚。

设计、地点和参与者:这项随机、双盲、3 组研究在纽约市布朗克斯的一家城市 ED 进行。如果患者在 ED 出院时有罗伦兹-莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)评分大于 5,则有资格入选。RMDQ 是一种常用的 24 项问卷,用于测量 LBP 和相关的功能障碍,其中 0 表示没有功能障碍,24 表示最大障碍。从 2012 年 4 月开始,共接触了 2588 名患者进行登记。在 323 名被认为有参与资格的患者中,有 107 名被随机分配接受安慰剂,108 名接受环苯扎林,108 名接受羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚。随访于 2014 年 12 月完成。

干预措施

所有参与者均给予萘普生 20 片,500mg,每日两次服用。他们被随机分配接受安慰剂 60 片;环苯扎林,5mg;或羟考酮,5mg/对乙酰氨基酚,325mg。参与者被指示根据需要每 8 小时服用 1 或 2 片,以缓解 LBP。他们还在出院前接受了 10 分钟的标准化 LBP 教育课程。

主要结果和测量

主要结果是 ED 出院后和 1 周后 RMDQ 的改善。

结果

3 组的人口统计学特征相似。在基线时,安慰剂组的中位数 RMDQ 评分为 20(四分位距[IQR],17-21),环苯扎林组为 19(IQR,17-21),羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚组为 20(IQR,17-22)。在 1 周随访时,安慰剂组的平均 RMDQ 改善为 9.8,环苯扎林组为 10.1,羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚组为 11.1。与安慰剂相比,环苯扎林组的平均 RMDQ 改善差异为 0.3(98.3% CI,-2.6 至 3.2;P=0.77),羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚组为 1.3(98.3% CI,-1.5 至 4.1;P=0.28),羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚组为 0.9(98.3% CI,-2.1 至 3.9;P=0.45)。

结论和相关性

在因急性、非创伤性、非神经根性 LBP 就诊 ED 的患者中,在萘普生单独治疗的基础上加用环苯扎林或羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚并不能改善 1 周时的功能结局或疼痛。这些发现不支持在这种情况下使用这些额外的药物。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT01587274。

相似文献

1
Naproxen With Cyclobenzaprine, Oxycodone/Acetaminophen, or Placebo for Treating Acute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.萘普生联合环苯扎林、羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚或安慰剂治疗急性腰痛的随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1572-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13043.
2
Diazepam Is No Better Than Placebo When Added to Naproxen for Acute Low Back Pain.地西泮与萘普生联用治疗急性下腰痛时并不比安慰剂效果更好。
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;70(2):169-176.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.10.002. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
3
Ibuprofen Plus Acetaminophen Versus Ibuprofen Alone for Acute Low Back Pain: An Emergency Department-based Randomized Study.布洛芬联合对乙酰氨基酚与单用布洛芬治疗急性腰痛:一项基于急诊科的随机研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Mar;27(3):229-235. doi: 10.1111/acem.13898. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
4
Comparison of naproxen with cyclobenzaprine, oxycodone-acetaminophen, and placebo for the treatment of acute low back pain.萘普生与环苯扎林、羟考酮-对乙酰氨基酚及安慰剂治疗急性下腰痛的比较。
CJEM. 2016 Nov;18(6):491-494. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.370. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
5
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Naproxen With or Without Orphenadrine or Methocarbamol for Acute Low Back Pain.萘普生联合或不联合奥芬那君或美索巴莫治疗急性腰痛的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;71(3):348-356.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.031. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
6
ACP Journal Club. In acute low back pain, adding oxycodone/acetaminophen or cyclobenzaprine to naproxen did not improve pain or function.《美国内科医师学会杂志俱乐部》。在急性下腰痛中,在萘普生基础上加用羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚或环苯扎林并不能改善疼痛或功能。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):JC19. doi: 10.7326/ACPJC-2016-164-4-019.
7
PURLs: More isn't better with acute low back pain treatment.持久治疗性超声:急性腰痛治疗并非越多越好。
J Fam Pract. 2016 Jun;65(6):404-6.
8
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Ibuprofen Plus Metaxalone, Tizanidine, or Baclofen for Acute Low Back Pain.布洛芬联合美索巴莫、替扎尼定或巴氯芬治疗急性腰痛的随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;74(4):512-520. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.02.017. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
9
The Relative Efficacy of Seven Skeletal Muscle Relaxants. An Analysis of Data From Randomized Studies.七种骨骼肌松弛剂的相对疗效。随机研究数据分析。
J Emerg Med. 2022 Apr;62(4):455-461. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.09.025. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
10
Cyclobenzaprine with ibuprofen versus ibuprofen alone in acute myofascial strain: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.环苯扎林联合布洛芬与单独使用布洛芬治疗急性肌筋膜劳损的随机双盲临床试验
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Jun;41(6):818-26. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.188.

引用本文的文献

1
Randomized Trial of Self-Selected Music Intervention on Pain and Anxiety in Emergency Department Patients with Musculoskeletal Back Pain.针对急诊科肌肉骨骼性背痛患者的自选音乐干预对疼痛和焦虑影响的随机试验
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Jun 25;26(4):1112-1119. doi: 10.5811/westjem.34871.
2
Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Diclofenac and Thiocolchicoside in the Treatment of Low Back Pain and Other Conditions: Systematic Review of the Literature.双氯芬酸与秋水仙碱糖苷联合治疗腰痛及其他病症的疗效和安全性:文献系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 20;13(6):677. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13060677.
3
Effect of emergency department opioid prescribing on health outcomes.
急诊科阿片类药物处方对健康结局的影响。
CMAJ. 2025 Feb 9;197(5):E122-E130. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.241542.
4
Trends in oxycodone and oxycodone-containing analgesics administration for back pain in emergency departments in the USA (2007-2018).美国急诊科治疗背痛的羟考酮及含羟考酮镇痛剂的使用趋势(2007 - 2018年)
World J Emerg Med. 2024;15(3):169-174. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.002.
5
A Study of 60 Patients with Low Back Pain to Compare Outcomes Following Magnetotherapy, Ultrasound, Laser, and Electrotherapy with and without Lumbosacral Kinesiotherapy.60 例腰痛患者的研究比较磁疗、超声、激光和电疗与腰骶部运动疗法联合和不联合的疗效。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Apr 1;30:e943732. doi: 10.12659/MSM.943732.
6
Opioids for Acute Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.阿片类药物治疗急性肌肉骨骼疼痛:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Drugs. 2024 Mar;84(3):305-317. doi: 10.1007/s40265-024-01999-5. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
7
Topical Diclofenac Versus Oral Ibuprofen Versus Diclofenac + Ibuprofen for Emergency Department Patients With Acute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Study.局部用双氯芬酸与口服布洛芬及双氯芬酸 + 布洛芬治疗急诊科急性腰痛患者的随机对照研究
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Jun;83(6):542-551. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.01.037. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
8
What a pain in the … back: a review of current treatment options with a focus on naproxen sodium.真是令人头疼:当前治疗选择的综述,重点是萘普生钠。
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2024 Feb 7;27:12384. doi: 10.3389/jpps.2024.12384. eCollection 2024.
9
A critical review of the role of manual therapy in the treatment of individuals with low back pain.对手法治疗在治疗腰痛患者中的作用的批判性回顾。
J Man Manip Ther. 2024 Oct;32(5):464-477. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2024.2316393. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
10
Restriction of oxycodone in the emergency department (ROXY-ED): A randomised controlled trial.急诊科羟考酮限制使用(ROXY-ED):一项随机对照试验。
Br J Pain. 2023 Oct;17(5):491-500. doi: 10.1177/20494637231189031. Epub 2023 Jul 12.