Horn Maggie E, Fritz Julie M
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Doctor of Physical Therapy Division, Duke University, Box 104002, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Utah, 520 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 26;18(1):887. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3699-0.
Patients seek care from physical therapists for neck pain but it is unclear what the association of the timing of physical therapy (PT) consultation is on 1-year healthcare utilization and costs. The purpose of this study was to compare the 1-year healthcare utilization and costs between three PT timing groups: patients who consulted a physical therapist (PT) for neck pain within 14 days (early PT consultation), between 15 and 90 days (delayed PT consultation) or between 91 and 364 days (late PT consultation).
A retrospective cohort of 308 patients (69.2% female, ages 48.7[±14.5] years) were categorized into PT timing groups. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each group. In adjusted regression models, 1-year healthcare utilization of injections, imaging, opioids and costs were compared between groups.
Compared to early PT consultation, the odds of receiving an opioid prescription (aOR = 2.79, 95%CI: 1.35-5.79), spinal injection (aOR = 4.36, 95%CI:2.26-8.45), undergoing an MRI (aOR = 4.68, 95%CI:2.25-9.74), X-ray (aOR = 2.97, 95%CI:1.61-5.47) or CT scan (aOR = 3.36, 95%CI: 1.14-9.97) were increased in patients in the late PT consultation group. Similar increases in risk were found in the delayed group (except CT and Opioids). Compared to the early PT consultation group, mean costs were $2172 ($557, $3786) higher in the late PT contact group and $1063 (95%CI: $ 138 - $1988) higher in the delayed PT consultation group.
There was an association with the timing of physical therapy consultation on healthcare utilization and costs, where later consultation was associated with increases costs and healthcare utilization. This study examined the association of timing of physical therapy consultation on costs and healthcare utilization, but not the association of increased access to physical therapy consultation. Therefore, the findings warrant further investigation to explore the effects of increased access to physical therapy consultation on healthcare utilization and costs in a prospective study.
患者因颈部疼痛寻求物理治疗师的治疗,但尚不清楚物理治疗(PT)咨询时间与1年医疗保健利用率和成本之间的关联。本研究的目的是比较三个PT时间组之间的1年医疗保健利用率和成本:在14天内(早期PT咨询)、15至90天之间(延迟PT咨询)或91至364天之间(晚期PT咨询)因颈部疼痛咨询物理治疗师(PT)的患者。
将308例患者(69.2%为女性,年龄48.7[±14.5]岁)的回顾性队列分为PT时间组。计算每组的描述性统计数据。在调整后的回归模型中,比较各组之间1年的注射、成像、阿片类药物医疗保健利用率和成本。
与早期PT咨询相比,晚期PT咨询组患者接受阿片类药物处方(aOR = 2.79,95%CI:1.35 - 5.79)、脊柱注射(aOR = 4.36,95%CI:2.26 - 8.45)、接受MRI(aOR = 4.68,95%CI:2.25 - 9.74)、X线检查(aOR = 2.97,95%CI:1.61 - 5.47)或CT扫描(aOR = 3.36,95%CI:1.14 - 9.97)的几率增加。延迟组也发现了类似的风险增加(CT和阿片类药物除外)。与早期PT咨询组相比,晚期PT接触组的平均成本高出2172美元(557美元,3786美元),延迟PT咨询组高出1063美元(95%CI:138美元 - 1988美元)。
物理治疗咨询时间与医疗保健利用率和成本之间存在关联,咨询时间越晚,成本和医疗保健利用率越高。本研究考察了物理治疗咨询时间与成本和医疗保健利用率之间的关联,但未考察增加物理治疗咨询机会的关联。因此,这些发现值得进一步研究,以在前瞻性研究中探索增加物理治疗咨询机会对医疗保健利用率和成本的影响。