Dental School, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy.
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Jun;19(2):151-155. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2018.19.02.10.
The aim of this study is to compare the sagittal dentoskeletal changes associated with different activation protocols of maxillary expander.
A total of 101 subjects with constricted maxillary arches (49 males and 52 females; mean age 10.08 ± 1.57 years) were enrolled in the study. The study comprised also a control group of 20 subjects (11 females and 9 males, mean age 10.27 ± 1.24 years) who were not treated during the observation period. All the subjects underwent rapid maxillary expansion with a stainless steel banded expander cemented to the maxillary first molars. The expansion screw was randomly activated with two different rapid maxillary expansion protocols (one-quarter per day or two-quarters per day). A statistical comparison between the sagittal cephalometric variations obtained in the two expansion groups was made, and compared with the untreated control group. Data were then stratified for skeletal maturation of each subject.
The Wilcoxon rank-sum test shows statistically significant differences between the two RME activation protocols only for overjet. Statistically significant differences were reported in comparison with the control group.
This study suggests that the increase in overjet after RME could be associated with faster activation protocols especially in subjects with lower skeletal maturation.
本研究旨在比较不同上颌扩张器激活方案相关的矢状齿槽骨变化。
共有 101 例上颌狭窄患者(男 49 例,女 52 例;平均年龄 10.08±1.57 岁)纳入本研究。研究还包括 20 例对照组患者(女 11 例,男 9 例,平均年龄 10.27±1.24 岁),在观察期间未接受治疗。所有患者均采用不锈钢带状扩弓器固定于上颌第一磨牙行快速上颌扩弓。扩弓螺丝以两种不同的快速上颌扩弓方案(每天四分之一圈或每天两圈)随机激活。对两种扩弓组获得的矢状头影测量变化进行了统计学比较,并与未治疗的对照组进行了比较。然后根据每位患者的骨骼成熟情况对数据进行分层。
Wilcoxon 秩和检验仅显示两种 RME 激活方案在覆𬌗方面存在统计学显著差异。与对照组相比,差异具有统计学意义。
本研究表明,RME 后覆𬌗的增加可能与更快的激活方案有关,尤其是在骨骼成熟度较低的患者中。