Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), CONICET, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Enfermera Gordillo esquina Enrique Barrios, CP 5000, Córdoba, Argentina(1); Department of Experimental Psychology, Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja S/N, CP 18011, Granada, Spain.
Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), CONICET, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Enfermera Gordillo esquina Enrique Barrios, CP 5000, Córdoba, Argentina(1); Departamento de Investigación, Fundación Oulton. Av. Vélez Sarsfield 562, CP 5000. Córdoba, Argentina.
J Neurosci Methods. 2018 Aug 1;306:77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 May 20.
Vigilance is generally understood as the ability to detect infrequent critical events through long time periods. In tasks like the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART), participants tend to detect fewer events across time, a phenomenon known as "vigilance decrement". However, vigilance might also involve sustaining a tonic arousal level. In the Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT), the vigilance decrement corresponds to an increment across time in both mean and variability of reaction time.
The present study aimed to develop a single task -Attentional Networks Test for Interactions and Vigilance - executive and arousal components (ANTI-Vea)- to simultaneously assess both components of vigilance (i.e., the executive vigilance as in the SART, and the arousal vigilance as in the PVT), while measuring the classic attentional functions (phasic alertness, orienting, and executive control).
In Experiment #1, the executive vigilance decrement was found as an increment in response bias. In Experiment #2, this result was replicated, and the arousal vigilance decrement was simultaneously observed as an increment in reaction time.
The ANTI-Vea solves some issues observed in the previous ANTI-V task with the executive vigilance measure (e.g., a low hit rate and no vigilance decrement). Furthermore, the new ANTI-Vea task assesses both components of vigilance together with others typical attentional functions.
The new attentional networks test developed here may be useful to provide a better understanding of the human attentional system. The role of sensitivity and response bias in the executive vigilance decrement are discussed.
警觉通常被理解为通过长时间检测罕见关键事件的能力。在持续注意反应任务(SART)等任务中,参与者随着时间的推移往往会检测到更少的事件,这种现象被称为“警觉衰减”。然而,警觉也可能涉及维持一种紧张的唤醒水平。在精神运动警觉测试(PVT)中,警觉衰减对应于反应时的均值和变异性随时间的增加。
本研究旨在开发一项单一任务——注意力网络测试的相互作用和警觉——执行和唤醒成分(ANTI-Vea)——同时评估警觉的两个成分(即 SART 中的执行警觉和 PVT 中的唤醒警觉),同时测量经典的注意力功能(相位警觉、定向和执行控制)。
在实验 #1 中,发现执行警觉衰减表现为反应偏差的增加。在实验 #2 中,复制了这一结果,同时观察到唤醒警觉衰减表现为反应时的增加。
ANTI-Vea 解决了之前的 ANTI-V 任务中与执行警觉测量相关的一些问题(例如,命中率低且没有警觉衰减)。此外,新的 ANTI-Vea 任务一起评估警觉的两个成分以及其他典型的注意力功能。
这里开发的新注意力网络测试可能有助于更好地理解人类注意力系统。讨论了敏感性和反应偏差在执行警觉衰减中的作用。