Kaye Deborah R, Qi Ji, Morgan Todd M, Linsell Susan, Lane Brian R, Montie James E, Cher Michael L, Miller David C
Dow Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Dow Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Urology. 2018 Aug;118:127-133. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.04.038. Epub 2018 May 21.
To examine the relationship between the use and results of early confirmatory testing and persistence on active surveillance (AS).
We identified all men in the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative registry diagnosed with favorable-risk prostate cancer from June 2016 to June 2017. We next examined trends in the use of early confirmatory test(s), defined as repeat biopsy, prostate magnetic resonance imaging, or molecular classifiers obtained within 6 months of the initial cancer diagnosis, in patients with favorable-risk prostate cancer. We then compared the proportion of men remaining on AS 6 months after diagnosis according to reassuring vs nonreassuring results, also stratifying by age and Gleason score.
Among 2529 patients, 32.7% underwent early confirmatory testing within 6 months of diagnosis. Its use increased from 25.4% in the second quarter of 2016 to 34.9% in the second quarter of 2017 (P = .025). Molecular classifiers were most frequently used (55%), followed by magnetic resonance imaging (34%) and repeat biopsy (11%). Sixty-four percent (n = 523) had a reassuring result. Rates of AS were higher for patients with early reassuring results; 82% remained on AS (n = 427) compared to 52% (n = 157) of those with nonreassuring results and 51% (n = 873) with no early confirmatory testing (P <.001).
Rates of AS are higher among men with early reassuring results, supporting the clinical utility of these tests. Nonetheless, high rates of AS among patients with nonreassuring results underscore the complexity of shared decision-making in this setting.
探讨早期确诊检测的使用情况与结果以及主动监测(AS)持续性之间的关系。
我们在密歇根泌尿外科手术改进协作登记处中确定了2016年6月至2017年6月期间被诊断为低危前列腺癌的所有男性患者。接下来,我们研究了低危前列腺癌患者中早期确诊检测(定义为在初次癌症诊断后6个月内进行的重复活检、前列腺磁共振成像或分子分类检测)的使用趋势。然后,我们根据检测结果令人安心与否,比较了诊断后6个月仍接受主动监测的男性比例,并按年龄和 Gleason 评分进行分层。
在2529例患者中,32.7%在诊断后6个月内接受了早期确诊检测。其使用率从2016年第二季度的25.4%增至2017年第二季度的34.9%(P = 0.025)。分子分类检测使用最为频繁(55%),其次是磁共振成像(34%)和重复活检(11%)。64%(n = 523)的检测结果令人安心。早期检测结果令人安心的患者接受主动监测的比例更高;82%(n = 427)的患者继续接受主动监测,而检测结果不令人安心的患者中这一比例为52%(n = 157),未进行早期确诊检测的患者中这一比例为51%(n = 873)(P < 0.001)。
早期检测结果令人安心的男性患者接受主动监测的比例更高,这支持了这些检测的临床实用性。尽管如此,检测结果不令人安心的患者中主动监测比例较高,凸显了这种情况下共同决策的复杂性。