Suppr超能文献

在精神科评估中采用法律病史。

Taking Legal Histories in Psychiatric Assessments.

机构信息

Dr. Morris is a resident in psychiatry at the Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Paul S. Appelbaum, M.D., is editor of this column.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Jul 1;69(7):748-750. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800183. Epub 2018 May 25.

Abstract

People with mental illness are often disproportionately affected by the U.S. justice system, yet psychiatrists and other mental health professionals may avoid or feel uncomfortable talking with patients about legal history. This column examines why legal history is relevant to psychiatric assessments and provides guidance for talking with patients about these issues. Key aspects of taking a legal history are reviewed, including suggested questions, the role of collateral information, and considerations for medicolegal documentation. Developing skills in taking patients' legal histories may equip clinicians to better understand their patients' stories and to provide more effective psychiatric care.

摘要

精神疾病患者经常受到美国司法系统的不成比例的影响,但精神科医生和其他心理健康专业人员可能会避免或对与患者谈论法律史感到不适。本专栏探讨了法律史与精神科评估相关的原因,并为与患者讨论这些问题提供了指导。审查了获取法律史的关键方面,包括建议的问题、旁证信息的作用以及医学法律文件记录的注意事项。培养获取患者法律史的技能可能使临床医生能够更好地理解患者的故事,并提供更有效的精神科护理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验