• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

避免或使用神经肌肉阻滞剂对气管插管结果的影响:一项 Cochrane 系统评价。

Effects of avoidance or use of neuromuscular blocking agents on outcomes in tracheal intubation: a Cochrane systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.

Research Center for Emergency Medicine, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jun;120(6):1381-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.106. Epub 2018 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.106
PMID:29793603
Abstract

Cohort studies have indicated that avoidance of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) is a risk factor for difficult tracheal intubation. However, the impact of avoiding NMBA on tracheal intubation, possible adverse effects, and postoperative discomfort has not been evaluated in a systematic review of randomised trials. We searched several databases for trials published until January 2017. We included randomised controlled trials comparing the effect of avoiding vs using NMBA. Two independent authors assessed risk of bias and extracted data. The risk of random errors was assessed by trial sequential analysis (TSA). We included 34 trials (3565 participants). In the four trials judged to have low risk of bias, there was an increased risk of difficult tracheal intubation with no use of NMBA [random-effects model, risk ratio (RR) 13.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 8.19-21.49, P<0.00001, TSA-adjusted CI 1.85-95.04]. The result was confirmed when including all trials, (RR 5.00, 95% CI 3.49-7.15, P<0.00001, TSA-adjusted CI 1.20-20.77). There was a significant risk of upper airway discomfort or injury by avoiding NMBA (RR=1.37, 95% CI 1.09-1.74, P=0.008, TSA-adjusted CI 1.00-1.86). None of the trials reported mortality. Avoiding NMBA was significantly associated with difficult laryngoscopy, (RR 2.54, 95% CI 1.53-4.21, P=0.0003, TSA-adjusted CI 0.27-21.75). In a clinical context, one must balance arguments for using NMBA when performing tracheal intubation.

摘要

队列研究表明,避免使用神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMBA)是困难气管插管的一个危险因素。然而,在随机试验的系统评价中,尚未评估避免 NMBA 对气管插管、可能的不良反应和术后不适的影响。我们在几个数据库中搜索了截至 2017 年 1 月发表的试验。我们纳入了比较避免使用与使用 NMBA 效果的随机对照试验。两名独立作者评估了偏倚风险并提取了数据。通过试验序贯分析(TSA)评估随机误差的风险。我们纳入了 34 项试验(3565 名参与者)。在四项被认为偏倚风险低的试验中,不使用 NMBA 会增加困难气管插管的风险[随机效应模型,风险比(RR)13.27,95%置信区间(CI)8.19-21.49,P<0.00001,TSA 调整 CI 1.85-95.04]。当包括所有试验时,结果得到了证实(RR 5.00,95%CI 3.49-7.15,P<0.00001,TSA 调整 CI 1.20-20.77)。避免 NMBA 会显著增加上呼吸道不适或损伤的风险(RR=1.37,95%CI 1.09-1.74,P=0.008,TSA 调整 CI 1.00-1.86)。没有试验报告死亡率。避免 NMBA 与喉镜检查困难显著相关(RR 2.54,95%CI 1.53-4.21,P=0.0003,TSA 调整 CI 0.27-21.75)。在临床环境中,在进行气管插管时,必须权衡使用 NMBA 的利弊。

相似文献

1
Effects of avoidance or use of neuromuscular blocking agents on outcomes in tracheal intubation: a Cochrane systematic review.避免或使用神经肌肉阻滞剂对气管插管结果的影响:一项 Cochrane 系统评价。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jun;120(6):1381-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.106. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
2
Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults and adolescents.在成人和青少年气管插管或直接喉镜检查期间,避免使用与使用神经肌肉阻滞剂以改善操作条件的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 17;5(5):CD009237. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009237.pub2.
3
Avoidance of neuromuscular blocking agents may increase the risk of difficult tracheal intubation: a cohort study of 103,812 consecutive adult patients recorded in the Danish Anaesthesia Database.避免使用神经肌肉阻滞剂可能会增加困难气管插管的风险:一项对丹麦麻醉数据库中连续记录的103812例成年患者的队列研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2009 Aug;103(2):283-90. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep124. Epub 2009 May 20.
4
Effects of avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for facilitation of tracheal intubation in children and infants: a protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.避免与使用神经肌肉阻滞剂促进儿童和婴儿气管插管效果的系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析方案。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Sep;68(8):1094-1100. doi: 10.1111/aas.14429. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
5
Neuromuscular blockade improves first-attempt success for intubation in the intensive care unit. A propensity matched analysis.神经肌肉阻滞可提高重症监护病房气管插管首次尝试的成功率。一项倾向匹配分析。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 May;12(5):734-41. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201411-517OC.
6
Supraglottic airway device versus tracheal intubation and the risk of emergent postoperative intubation after general anaesthesia in adults: a retrospective cohort study.成人全身麻醉后声门上气道装置与气管插管及术后紧急插管风险的回顾性队列研究
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;126(3):738-745. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.10.040. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
7
Neuromuscular-blocking agents for tracheal intubation in pediatric patients (0-12 years): A systematic review and meta-analysis.神经肌肉阻滞剂在儿科患者(0-12 岁)气管插管中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2020 Apr;30(4):401-414. doi: 10.1111/pan.13806. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
8
Detection of risk factors for difficult tracheal intubation.困难气管插管危险因素的检测。
Dan Med J. 2012 Apr;59(4):B4431.
9
Preoperative airway assessment - experience gained from a multicentre cluster randomised trial and the Danish Anaesthesia Database.术前气道评估——来自一项多中心整群随机试验和丹麦麻醉数据库的经验
Dan Med J. 2016 May;63(5).
10
Pharmacological agents for preventing morbidity associated with the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation.预防与气管插管血流动力学反应相关发病的药理制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 3;2013(7):CD004087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004087.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Upper airway discomfort: a randomized controlled double-blind trial comparing rocuronium and lidocaine spray for intubation.上呼吸道不适:一项比较罗库溴铵和利多卡因喷雾用于插管的随机对照双盲试验。
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Jun 20;30(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02798-8.
2
Endotracheal Tube Sizes During Surgical Procedures in Adult Patients. A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses and Trial Sequential Analyses.成年患者手术过程中的气管内导管尺寸。一项荟萃分析和试验序贯分析的系统评价
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Jul;69(6):e70065. doi: 10.1111/aas.70065.
3
[Management of neuromuscular block during general anesthesia : Results of a survey in Germany in 2020 compared to the recommendations of the first European guidelines in 2023].
[全身麻醉期间神经肌肉阻滞的管理:2020年德国一项调查结果与2023年欧洲首个指南建议的比较]
Anaesthesiologie. 2025 Apr;74(4):207-217. doi: 10.1007/s00101-025-01511-y. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
4
Intubating conditions during rapid sequence induction with either rocuronium or suxamethonium in elderly patients. A randomised study.老年患者在使用罗库溴铵或琥珀酰胆碱进行快速顺序诱导时的插管条件。一项随机研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Mar;69(3):e14589. doi: 10.1111/aas.14589.
5
Adverse events related to neuromuscular blocking agents: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.与神经肌肉阻滞剂相关的不良事件:美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统的不成比例分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 24;15:1403988. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1403988. eCollection 2024.
6
Anaesthesia for thyroid and parathyroid surgery.甲状腺和甲状旁腺手术的麻醉
BJA Educ. 2024 Aug;24(8):270-276. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2024.04.004. Epub 2024 May 31.
7
Characterizing intubation practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey of the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN) sites.描述应对 COVID-19 大流行期间的插管实践:对加拿大 COVID-19 急诊快速反应网络(CCEDRRN)站点的调查。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Nov 24;23(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00911-w.
8
General Anesthetic Care of Obese Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Review of Current Anesthetic Considerations and Recent Advances.肥胖患者手术的全身麻醉护理:当前麻醉考量及最新进展综述
Cureus. 2023 Jul 8;15(7):e41565. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41565. eCollection 2023 Jul.
9
Use of neuromuscular blockade for neck dissection and association with iatrogenic nerve injury.神经肌肉阻滞在颈部解剖中的应用及其与医源性神经损伤的关系。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jul 28;23(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02217-7.
10
Perioperative Care of the Pediatric Patient and an Algorithm for the Treatment of Intraoperative Bronchospasm.小儿患者的围手术期护理及术中支气管痉挛的治疗算法
J Asthma Allergy. 2023 Jun 23;16:649-660. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S414026. eCollection 2023.