Suppr超能文献

超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞的生理反应与基因表达:一项对比研究

Physiological Responses and Gene Expression in Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: a Comparative Study.

作者信息

Sayyed Hayam G, Idriss Naglaa K, Gaber Marwa A, Sayed Sherif, Ahmed Rasha

机构信息

Departments of Medical Physiology, Assiut, Egypt.

Departments of Medical Biochemistry, Assiut, Egypt.

出版信息

Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;46(6):2412-2420. doi: 10.1159/000489647. Epub 2018 May 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block (BPB) has come into wider use as a regional anesthetic during upper limb operations. This study assessed the neurological and hemodynamic changes and gene expression after co-administration of midazolam or neostigmine with bupivacaine during supraclavicular BPB.

METHODS

The study involved 90 adults divided into three groups: control (bupivacaine), midazolam (bupivacaine plus midazolam), and neostigmine (bupivacaine plus neostigmine). Blood samples were taken and interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) mRNA levels were measured by real-time PCR, and oxidative stress markers were identified. In addition to the hemodynamic variables, the onset and duration of sensory and motor blockades, duration of analgesia, pain scores, time of first request for an analgesic, and amounts of analgesics ingested were evaluated.

RESULTS

Compared with the control and neostigmine groups, the midazolam group experienced longer sensory and motor blockades, prolonged analgesia, lower pain scores at 12 h and 24 h, and lower need for postoperative analgesics. Moreover, the midazolam group exhibited lower oxidative stress markers with a higher fold change in IL-6 and TNF-α mRNA levels.

CONCLUSION

Midazolam co-administered with bupivacaine provided better analgesic quality than did neostigmine with bupivacaine. This might be due to its superior antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects.

摘要

背景/目的:超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞(BPB)已在更多上肢手术中作为区域麻醉方法使用。本研究评估了在锁骨上BPB期间咪达唑仑或新斯的明与布比卡因联合使用后的神经学和血流动力学变化以及基因表达。

方法

该研究纳入90名成年人,分为三组:对照组(布比卡因)、咪达唑仑组(布比卡因加咪达唑仑)和新斯的明组(布比卡因加新斯的明)。采集血样,通过实时聚合酶链反应测量白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)的mRNA水平,并鉴定氧化应激标志物。除血流动力学变量外,还评估了感觉和运动阻滞的起效时间和持续时间、镇痛持续时间、疼痛评分、首次要求使用镇痛药的时间以及摄入的镇痛药量。

结果

与对照组和新斯的明组相比,咪达唑仑组的感觉和运动阻滞时间更长、镇痛时间延长、12小时和24小时时疼痛评分更低,且术后镇痛药需求更低。此外,咪达唑仑组的氧化应激标志物更低,IL-6和TNF-α mRNA水平的倍数变化更高。

结论

与布比卡因联合使用时,咪达唑仑比新斯的明提供了更好的镇痛质量。这可能归因于其卓越的抗氧化和抗炎作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验