From the Physical Therapy Department, Al-Isra University, Amman, Jordan (ME); Physical Activity and Health Promotion, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy (YK); Department of Rehabilitation, Fondazione di Ricerca e cura "Giovanni Paolo II," Campobasso, Italy (FL); Physical and Occupational Therapy Department, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan (MH); Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan (ZH); Neurorehabilitation Department, INM, Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy (DC); and Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy (CF).
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Nov;97(11):793-807. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000970.
The aim of the study was to examine the effectiveness of physiotherapy (PT) interventions on spasticity in people with multiple sclerosis.
A systematic search was performed using PRISMA guidance. Studies evaluate the effect of PT interventions on spasticity were included. People with multiple sclerosis, spasticity, disability and PT interventions characteristics were extracted in included studies. Level of evidence was synthesized by the Grade of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Meta-analyses were performed by calculating Hedges g at 95% confidence interval.
A total of 29 studies were included in the review, and 25 were included in the meta-analyses. The included PT interventions were exercise therapy, electrical stimulation, radial shock wave therapy, vibration, and standing. The review and meta-analyses showed different evidences of benefits and nonbenefits for PT interventions on some spasticity outcomes. The best quality evidences were for beneficial effects of exercise therapy especially robot gait training and outpatient exercise programs on self-perceived spasticity and muscle tone respectively. The review results were positive regarding the acute effects, follow-up measurements, safety, progressive MS, and nonambulatory people with multiple sclerosis. The included articles were heterogeneous and badly reported in PT interventions and people with multiple sclerosis characteristics.
Physiotherapy interventions can be a safe and beneficial option for spasticity in people with multiple sclerosis. No firm conclusion can be drawn on overall spasticity. Further researches in different spasticity aspects are needed.
本研究旨在探讨物理治疗(PT)干预对多发性硬化症患者痉挛的疗效。
采用 PRISMA 指南进行系统检索。纳入评估 PT 干预对痉挛影响的研究。在纳入的研究中提取了多发性硬化症患者、痉挛、残疾和 PT 干预特征。采用推荐评估、发展和评估(GRADE)方法对证据水平进行综合评估。通过计算 95%置信区间的 Hedge g 进行荟萃分析。
共纳入 29 项研究,其中 25 项纳入荟萃分析。纳入的 PT 干预措施包括运动疗法、电刺激、径向冲击波治疗、振动和站立。综述和荟萃分析显示,PT 干预对某些痉挛结局的疗效存在不同的证据。最佳质量证据表明,运动疗法(尤其是机器人步态训练和门诊运动方案)对自我感知的痉挛和肌肉紧张度具有有益的影响。急性效应、随访测量、安全性、进展性多发性硬化症和非活动性多发性硬化症患者的综述结果为阳性。纳入的文章在 PT 干预措施和多发性硬化症患者特征方面存在异质性和报告不足。
物理治疗干预可能是多发性硬化症患者痉挛的一种安全有效的选择。对于整体痉挛,不能得出明确的结论。需要对不同的痉挛方面进行进一步的研究。