• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

培利昔洛韦在非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中的应用:德国的时间、精力和成本分析。

Plerixafor in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: a German analysis of time, effort and costs.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019 Jan;54(1):123-129. doi: 10.1038/s41409-018-0228-z. Epub 2018 May 24.

DOI:10.1038/s41409-018-0228-z
PMID:29795422
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6320344/
Abstract

Mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells is part of the standard treatment procedure for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients eligible for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. Mobilization is usually achieved with chemotherapy and/or cytokines, but plerixafor might be added in case of poor mobilization. Due to the high cost several institutions have developed their own management pathway to optimize use of plerixafor. Such models are however rarely generalizable; in a multi-center, European, non-interventional study, evaluating the impact of plerixafor in poor mobilizers, country specific differences in patient treatment and cost structure were obvious. For German centers, there was a non-significant reduction in the number of apheresis sessions carried out and in apheresis costs. In contrast to other European countries the majority of German Plerixafor patients were very poor mobilizing patients with initial CD34+ cell count ≤ 10/µl (40/51). In this group the number of apheresis sessions decreased from 2.1 to 1.6 sessions per patient (p = 0.01) and costs decreased from €6246 to €4758 (p = 0.01). Our results show that preemptive plerixafor use has a strong effect in poor mobilizers with an initial CD34+ cell count ≤ 10 cells/µl.

摘要

动员和采集外周血干细胞是适合接受自体干细胞移植的高剂量化疗的非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的标准治疗程序的一部分。动员通常通过化疗和/或细胞因子来实现,但如果动员效果不佳,可以添加培西洛沙福。由于成本高昂,许多机构已经开发出自己的管理途径,以优化培西洛沙福的使用。然而,这些模型很少具有通用性;在一项评估培西洛沙福对动员不良患者的影响的多中心、欧洲、非干预性研究中,明显存在患者治疗和成本结构的国家特定差异。对于德国中心,进行的单采次数和单采成本均有非显著减少。与其他欧洲国家相比,大多数德国培西洛沙福患者是初始 CD34+细胞计数≤10/µl 的非常差的动员患者(40/51)。在该组中,每位患者的单采次数从 2.1 次减少到 1.6 次(p=0.01),成本从€6246 减少到€4758(p=0.01)。我们的结果表明,在初始 CD34+细胞计数≤10 个细胞/µl 的动员不良患者中,预防性使用培西洛沙福具有很强的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0930/6320344/518449faca69/41409_2018_228_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0930/6320344/518449faca69/41409_2018_228_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0930/6320344/518449faca69/41409_2018_228_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Plerixafor in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: a German analysis of time, effort and costs.培利昔洛韦在非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中的应用:德国的时间、精力和成本分析。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019 Jan;54(1):123-129. doi: 10.1038/s41409-018-0228-z. Epub 2018 May 24.
2
Plerixafor in poor mobilizers with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a multi-center time-motion analysis.非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中动员不佳者应用普乐沙福:一项多中心时间-运动分析。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018 Mar;53(3):246-254. doi: 10.1038/s41409-017-0033-0. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
3
European data on stem cell mobilization with plerixafor in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma patients. A subgroup analysis of the European Consortium of stem cell mobilization.欧洲非霍奇金淋巴瘤、霍奇金淋巴瘤和多发性骨髓瘤患者中用培洛昔芳进行干细胞动员的数据。欧洲干细胞动员联合会的亚组分析。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012 Aug;47(8):1046-50. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2011.216. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a risk-adapted algorithm of plerixafor use for autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization.风险适应算法在培瑞克昔福用于自体外周血造血干细胞动员中的成本效果分析。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Jan;19(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.08.010. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
5
Plerixafor as first- and second-line strategies for autologous stem cell mobilization in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma.培洛昔福作为非霍奇金淋巴瘤或多发性骨髓瘤患者自体干细胞动员的一线和二线策略。
Pharmacotherapy. 2012 Jul;32(7):596-603. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2012.01096.x.
6
Plerixafor: A chemokine receptor-4 antagonist for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma.普乐沙福:一种趋化因子受体-4 拮抗剂,用于高剂量化疗治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤或多发性骨髓瘤后移植造血干细胞的动员。
Clin Ther. 2010 May;32(5):821-43. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.05.007.
7
Pre-emptive plerixafor injection increases blood neutrophil, lymphocyte and monocyte counts in addition to CD34+ counts in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma mobilizing poorly with chemotherapy plus G-CSF: potential implications for apheresis and graft composition.对于化疗联合粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员效果不佳的非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者,预先使用普乐沙福注射液除了能增加CD34+细胞计数外,还能提高血液中的中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞和单核细胞计数:对单采术及移植物组成的潜在影响。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2012 Jun;46(3):257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2012.03.011. Epub 2012 Mar 31.
8
Pegfilgrastim- versus filgrastim-based autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in the setting of preemptive use of plerixafor: efficacy and cost analysis.在预先使用普乐沙福的情况下,培格非格司亭与非格司亭为基础的自体造血干细胞动员:疗效和成本分析。
Transfusion. 2012 Nov;52(11):2375-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03579.x. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
9
Plerixafor and G-CSF for autologous stem cell mobilization in patients with NHL, Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma: results from the expanded access program.培洛昔福联合 G-CSF 用于 NHL、霍奇金淋巴瘤和多发性骨髓瘤患者的自体干细胞动员:扩展准入计划的结果。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Jun;48(6):777-81. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.219. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
10
Plerixafor (Mozobil): A Stem Cell-Mobilizing Agent for Transplantation in Lymphoma Patients Predicted to Be Poor Mobilizers - A Pilot Study.普乐沙福(莫泽比利):一种用于预计动员效果不佳的淋巴瘤患者移植的干细胞动员剂——一项试点研究。
Acta Haematol. 2016;135(1):29-36. doi: 10.1159/000435769. Epub 2015 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
G-CSF + plerixafor versus G-CSF alone mobilized hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.G-CSF+plerixafor 与单独使用 G-CSF 动员多发性骨髓瘤和淋巴瘤患者的造血干细胞:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2329140. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2329140. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
2
Mobilization and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Collection in Poor Mobilizing Patients with Lymphoma: Final Results of the German OPTIMOB Study.淋巴瘤动员不佳患者的动员及造血干细胞采集:德国OPTIMOB研究的最终结果
Transfus Med Hemother. 2023 Sep 21;50(5):403-416. doi: 10.1159/000531936. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Plerixafor in poor mobilizers with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a multi-center time-motion analysis.非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中动员不佳者应用普乐沙福:一项多中心时间-运动分析。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018 Mar;53(3):246-254. doi: 10.1038/s41409-017-0033-0. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
2
Additional plerixafor to granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation for autologous transplantation in people with malignant lymphoma or multiple myeloma.在恶性淋巴瘤或多发性骨髓瘤患者中,在使用粒细胞集落刺激因子的基础上加用普乐沙福用于造血干细胞动员以进行自体移植。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 20;2015(10):CD010615. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010615.pub2.
3
Poor Mobilizers in Lymphoma but Not Myeloma Patients Had Significantly Poorer Progression-Free Survival after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: Results of a Large Retrospective, Single-Center Observational Study.
淋巴瘤患者中动员不佳者而非骨髓瘤患者在自体干细胞移植后无进展生存期显著更差:一项大型回顾性单中心观察性研究的结果
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 18;15(3):608. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030608.
4
Cost burden of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的成本负担。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Dec;19(6):645-661. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1680288. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
Autologous haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients: a position statement from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.
多发性骨髓瘤和淋巴瘤患者的自体造血干细胞动员:欧洲血液与骨髓移植组的立场声明
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014 Jul;49(7):865-72. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2014.39. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
4
Optimizing autologous stem cell mobilization strategies to improve patient outcomes: consensus guidelines and recommendations.优化自体干细胞动员策略以改善患者结局:共识指南和建议。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Mar;20(3):295-308. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.10.013. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
5
Engraftment and outcome after autologous stem cell transplantation in plerixafor-mobilized non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients.培门冬酶动员的非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者自体干细胞移植后的植入和结果。
Transfusion. 2014 May;54(5):1243-50. doi: 10.1111/trf.12434. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
6
Cost-effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies including plerixafor in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients.包括普乐沙福在内的造血干细胞动员策略在多发性骨髓瘤和淋巴瘤患者中的成本效益。
J Clin Apher. 2013 Dec;28(6):395-403. doi: 10.1002/jca.21290. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a risk-adapted algorithm of plerixafor use for autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization.风险适应算法在培瑞克昔福用于自体外周血造血干细胞动员中的成本效果分析。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Jan;19(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.08.010. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
8
Proposed definition of 'poor mobilizer' in lymphoma and multiple myeloma: an analytic hierarchy process by ad hoc working group Gruppo ItalianoTrapianto di Midollo Osseo.淋巴瘤和多发性骨髓瘤中“不良动员者”的定义建议:意大利骨髓移植组特设工作组的层次分析法。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012 Mar;47(3):342-51. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2011.82. Epub 2011 May 30.
9
Effectiveness and cost analysis of "just-in-time" salvage plerixafor administration in autologous transplant patients with poor stem cell mobilization kinetics.“即时”补救性普乐沙福给药在干细胞动员动力学不佳的自体移植患者中的有效性和成本分析。
Transfusion. 2011 Oct;51(10):2175-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03136.x. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
10
Development and validation of a decision-making algorithm to guide the use of plerixafor for autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization.开发和验证一种决策算法,以指导使用plerixafor 进行自体造血干细胞动员。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011 Jan;46(1):64-9. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.78. Epub 2010 Apr 12.