• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

包括普乐沙福在内的造血干细胞动员策略在多发性骨髓瘤和淋巴瘤患者中的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies including plerixafor in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients.

作者信息

Tichopád Aleš, Vítová Veronika, Kořístek Zdeněk, Lysák Daniel

机构信息

CEEOR-Central and Eastern European Outcomes Research, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Immunology Methods, Medical School and Teaching Hospital in Pilsen, Czech Republic.

出版信息

J Clin Apher. 2013 Dec;28(6):395-403. doi: 10.1002/jca.21290. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1002/jca.21290
PMID:23922227
Abstract

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are preferred source of hematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplantation. Mobilization of PBSCs using chemotherapy and/or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) however fails in around 20%. Combining G-CSF with plerixafor increases the mobilizations success. We compared cost-effectiveness of following schemes: the use of plerixafor "on demand" (POD) during the first mobilization in all patients with inadequate response, the remobilization with plerixafor following failure of the first standard mobilization (SSP), and the standard (re)mobilization scheme without plerixafor (SSNP). Decision tree models populated with data from a first-of-a-kind patient registry in six Czech centers (n = 93) were built to compare clinical benefits and direct costs from the payer's perspective. The success rates and costs for POD, SSP and SSNP mobilizations were; 94.9%, $7,197; 94.7%, $8,049; 84.7%, $5,991, respectively. The direct cost per successfully treated patient was $7,586, $8,501, and $7,077, respectively. The cost of re-mobilization of a poor mobilizer was $5,808 with G-CSF only and $16,755 if plerixafor was added. The total cost of plerixafor "on-demand" in the sub-cohort of poor mobilizers was $17,120. Generally, plerixafor improves the mobilization success by 10% and allows an additional patient to be successfully mobilized for incremental $11,803. Plerixafor is better and cheaper if used "on demand" than within a subsequent remobilization.

摘要

外周血干细胞(PBSCs)是自体移植造血干细胞的首选来源。然而,使用化疗和/或粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员PBSCs时,约20%的患者动员失败。将G-CSF与普乐沙福联合使用可提高动员成功率。我们比较了以下方案的成本效益:在所有反应不佳的患者首次动员时“按需”使用普乐沙福(POD)、首次标准动员(SSP)失败后用普乐沙福进行再次动员,以及不使用普乐沙福的标准(再)动员方案(SSNP)。利用来自捷克六个中心首个患者登记处的数据(n = 93)构建决策树模型,从支付方的角度比较临床获益和直接成本。POD、SSP和SSNP动员的成功率和成本分别为:94.9%,7197美元;94.7%,8049美元;84.7%,5991美元。每例成功治疗患者的直接成本分别为7586美元、8501美元和7077美元。仅使用G-CSF时,动员不佳者再次动员的成本为5808美元,添加普乐沙福时为16755美元。在动员不佳的亚组中,普乐沙福“按需”使用的总成本为17120美元。一般来说,普乐沙福可使动员成功率提高10%,每增加一例成功动员的患者,增量成本为11803美元。“按需”使用普乐沙福比在后续再次动员时使用更好且更便宜。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies including plerixafor in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients.包括普乐沙福在内的造血干细胞动员策略在多发性骨髓瘤和淋巴瘤患者中的成本效益。
J Clin Apher. 2013 Dec;28(6):395-403. doi: 10.1002/jca.21290. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
2
Plerixafor on-demand combined with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: significant improvement in peripheral blood stem cells mobilization and harvest with no increase in costs.按需使用普乐沙福联合化疗和粒细胞集落刺激因子:在外周血干细胞动员和采集方面有显著改善,且不增加成本。
Br J Haematol. 2014 Jan;164(1):113-23. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12606. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
3
Effectiveness and cost analysis of "just-in-time" salvage plerixafor administration in autologous transplant patients with poor stem cell mobilization kinetics.“即时”补救性普乐沙福给药在干细胞动员动力学不佳的自体移植患者中的有效性和成本分析。
Transfusion. 2011 Oct;51(10):2175-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03136.x. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
4
Pegfilgrastim- versus filgrastim-based autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in the setting of preemptive use of plerixafor: efficacy and cost analysis.在预先使用普乐沙福的情况下,培格非格司亭与非格司亭为基础的自体造血干细胞动员:疗效和成本分析。
Transfusion. 2012 Nov;52(11):2375-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03579.x. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
5
GCSF with or without chemotherapy compared to Plerixafor with GCSF as salvage mobilization regimen in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma: collection effectiveness and cost effectiveness analysis.在多发性骨髓瘤和淋巴瘤患者中,将粒细胞集落刺激因子(GCSF)联合或不联合化疗与普乐沙福联合GCSF作为挽救性动员方案进行比较:采集有效性和成本效益分析。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2014 Apr;20(2):130-6. doi: 10.1177/1078155213484785. Epub 2013 May 15.
6
Plerixafor: a review of its use in stem-cell mobilization in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma.普乐沙福:在淋巴瘤或多发性骨髓瘤患者中用于干细胞动员的综述。
Drugs. 2011 Aug 20;71(12):1623-47. doi: 10.2165/11206040-000000000-00000.
7
Evaluating the use of plerixafor in stem cell mobilisation - an economic analysis of the PHANTASTIC trial.评估普乐沙福在干细胞动员中的应用——PHANTASTIC试验的经济学分析。
J Clin Apher. 2016 Oct;31(5):434-42. doi: 10.1002/jca.21433. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
8
Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients treat in the novel therapy-era with plerixafor and G-CSF has superior efficacy but significantly higher costs compared to mobilization with low-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF.在新型治疗时代,使用普乐沙福和粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员多发性骨髓瘤患者的外周血干细胞,与使用低剂量环磷酰胺和G-CSF进行动员相比,具有更高的疗效,但成本显著更高。
J Clin Apher. 2013 Oct;28(5):359-67. doi: 10.1002/jca.21280. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
9
G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor vs hyperfractionated CY plus G-CSF for autologous stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: effectiveness, safety and cost analysis.粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)联合抢先使用普乐沙福与超分割环磷酰胺(CY)联合G-CSF用于多发性骨髓瘤自体干细胞动员:有效性、安全性及成本分析
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015 Jun;50(6):813-7. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.23. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a risk-adapted algorithm of plerixafor use for autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization.风险适应算法在培瑞克昔福用于自体外周血造血干细胞动员中的成本效果分析。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Jan;19(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.08.010. Epub 2012 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Preemptive Plerixafor Versus Rescue Plerixafor for Mobilization and Collection of Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Patients With Multiple Myeloma and Lymphoma.抢先使用普乐沙福与挽救性使用普乐沙福在多发性骨髓瘤和淋巴瘤患者中动员和采集造血干细胞的成本效益
J Clin Apher. 2025 Jun;40(3):e70026. doi: 10.1002/jca.70026.
2
An evidence-based and risk-adapted GSF versus GSF plus plerixafor mobilization strategy to obtain a sufficient CD34 cell yield in the harvest for autologous stem cell transplants.一种基于证据且根据风险调整的粒细胞集落刺激因子(GSF)与粒细胞集落刺激因子加普乐沙福动员策略,以在自体干细胞移植的采集物中获得足够的CD34细胞产量。
Transl Oncol. 2024 Jan;39:101811. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101811. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
3
Machine learning-based scoring models to predict hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in allogeneic donors.
基于机器学习的评分模型预测异基因供者造血干细胞动员。
Blood Adv. 2022 Apr 12;6(7):1991-2000. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005149.
4
Chemotherapy-based versus chemotherapy-free stem cell mobilization (± plerixafor) in multiple myeloma patients: an Italian cost-effectiveness analysis.多发性骨髓瘤患者中基于化疗与非化疗的干细胞动员(±普乐沙福):一项意大利成本效益分析
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2021 Aug;56(8):1876-1887. doi: 10.1038/s41409-021-01251-8. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
5
Cost burden of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的成本负担。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Dec;19(6):645-661. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1680288. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
6
Plerixafor in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: a German analysis of time, effort and costs.培利昔洛韦在非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中的应用:德国的时间、精力和成本分析。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019 Jan;54(1):123-129. doi: 10.1038/s41409-018-0228-z. Epub 2018 May 24.