Suppr超能文献

包括普乐沙福在内的造血干细胞动员策略在多发性骨髓瘤和淋巴瘤患者中的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies including plerixafor in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients.

作者信息

Tichopád Aleš, Vítová Veronika, Kořístek Zdeněk, Lysák Daniel

机构信息

CEEOR-Central and Eastern European Outcomes Research, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Immunology Methods, Medical School and Teaching Hospital in Pilsen, Czech Republic.

出版信息

J Clin Apher. 2013 Dec;28(6):395-403. doi: 10.1002/jca.21290. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

Abstract

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are preferred source of hematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplantation. Mobilization of PBSCs using chemotherapy and/or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) however fails in around 20%. Combining G-CSF with plerixafor increases the mobilizations success. We compared cost-effectiveness of following schemes: the use of plerixafor "on demand" (POD) during the first mobilization in all patients with inadequate response, the remobilization with plerixafor following failure of the first standard mobilization (SSP), and the standard (re)mobilization scheme without plerixafor (SSNP). Decision tree models populated with data from a first-of-a-kind patient registry in six Czech centers (n = 93) were built to compare clinical benefits and direct costs from the payer's perspective. The success rates and costs for POD, SSP and SSNP mobilizations were; 94.9%, $7,197; 94.7%, $8,049; 84.7%, $5,991, respectively. The direct cost per successfully treated patient was $7,586, $8,501, and $7,077, respectively. The cost of re-mobilization of a poor mobilizer was $5,808 with G-CSF only and $16,755 if plerixafor was added. The total cost of plerixafor "on-demand" in the sub-cohort of poor mobilizers was $17,120. Generally, plerixafor improves the mobilization success by 10% and allows an additional patient to be successfully mobilized for incremental $11,803. Plerixafor is better and cheaper if used "on demand" than within a subsequent remobilization.

摘要

外周血干细胞(PBSCs)是自体移植造血干细胞的首选来源。然而,使用化疗和/或粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员PBSCs时,约20%的患者动员失败。将G-CSF与普乐沙福联合使用可提高动员成功率。我们比较了以下方案的成本效益:在所有反应不佳的患者首次动员时“按需”使用普乐沙福(POD)、首次标准动员(SSP)失败后用普乐沙福进行再次动员,以及不使用普乐沙福的标准(再)动员方案(SSNP)。利用来自捷克六个中心首个患者登记处的数据(n = 93)构建决策树模型,从支付方的角度比较临床获益和直接成本。POD、SSP和SSNP动员的成功率和成本分别为:94.9%,7197美元;94.7%,8049美元;84.7%,5991美元。每例成功治疗患者的直接成本分别为7586美元、8501美元和7077美元。仅使用G-CSF时,动员不佳者再次动员的成本为5808美元,添加普乐沙福时为16755美元。在动员不佳的亚组中,普乐沙福“按需”使用的总成本为17120美元。一般来说,普乐沙福可使动员成功率提高10%,每增加一例成功动员的患者,增量成本为11803美元。“按需”使用普乐沙福比在后续再次动员时使用更好且更便宜。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验