Suppr超能文献

为何我们需要对破坏性行为给出单一的定义。

Why We Need a Single Definition of Disruptive Behavior.

作者信息

Petrovic Michelle A, Scholl Adam T

机构信息

Anesthesiology, University of Central Florida.

Independent Researcher.

出版信息

Cureus. 2018 Mar 18;10(3):e2339. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2339.

Abstract

Disruptive behavior is known to produce a wide range of negative effects in healthcare, such as impacting patient safety, lowering employee morale, and decreasing employee retention. Healthcare organizations have worked towards eliminating disruptive behavior; however, despite countless interventions, the issue continues to be a problem today. Why then does the issue of disruptive behavior persist? We argue that one reason is the multiple ways disruptive behavior can be described, henceforth defined as the "plurality of terms", which can make it difficult to collect relevant data by doing a simple literature search. Hence, we believe having a single definition for "disruptive behavior" will improve the meta-analysis on disruptive behavior research.

摘要

众所周知,破坏性行为在医疗保健领域会产生广泛的负面影响,比如影响患者安全、降低员工士气以及减少员工留存率。医疗保健机构一直在努力消除破坏性行为;然而,尽管进行了无数次干预,这个问题如今仍然存在。那么,为什么破坏性行为问题持续存在呢?我们认为一个原因是破坏性行为可以用多种方式来描述,以下简称“术语的多样性”,这使得通过简单的文献检索来收集相关数据变得困难。因此,我们相信为“破坏性行为”设定一个单一的定义将改善对破坏性行为研究的元分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61e9/5959733/cacb440bd50c/cureus-0010-00000002339-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验