一项关于进行超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNA)和细针活检的国际多机构调查。

An international, multi-institution survey on performing EUS-FNA and fine needle biopsy.

作者信息

Guo Jintao, Sahai Anand V, Teoh Anthony, Arcidiacono Paolo Giorgio, Larghi Alberto, Saftoiu Adrian, Siddiqui Ali A, Arturo Arias Brenda Lucia, Jenssen Christian, Adler Douglas G, Lakhtakia Sundeep, Seo Dong-Wan, Itokawa Fumihide, Giovannini Marc, Mishra Girish, Sabbagh Luis, Irisawa Atsushi, Iglesias-Garcia Julio, Poley Jan Werner, Vila Juan J, Jesse Lachter, Kubota Kensuke, Kalaitzakis Evangelos, Kida Mitsuhiro, El-Nady Mohamed, Mukai Sh Untaro, Ogura Takeshi, Fusaroli Pietro, Vilmann Peter, Rai Praveer, Nguyen Nam Q, Ponnudurai Ryan, Achanta Chalapathi Rao, Baron Todd H, Yasuda Ichiro, Wang Hsiu-Po, Hu Jinlong, Duan Bowen, Bhutani Manoop S, Sun Siyu

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Sheng Jing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.

Center Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

Endosc Ultrasound. 2020 Sep-Oct;9(5):319-328. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_56_20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and fine needle biopsy (FNB) are effective techniques that are widely used for tissue acquisition. However, it remains unclear how to obtain high-quality specimens. Therefore, we conducted a survey of EUS-FNA and FNB techniques to determine practice patterns worldwide and to develop strong recommendations based on the experience of experts in the field.

METHODS

This was a worldwide multi-institutional survey among members of the International Society of EUS Task Force (ISEUS-TF). The survey was administered by E-mail through the SurveyMonkey website. In some cases, percentage agreement with some statements was calculated; in others, the options with the greatest numbers of responses were summarized. Another questionnaire about the level of recommendation was designed to assess the respondents' answers.

RESULTS

ISEUS-TF members developed a questionnaire containing 17 questions that was sent to 53 experts. Thirty-five experts completed the survey within the specified period. Among them, 40% and 54.3% performed 50-200 and more than 200 EUS sampling procedures annually, respectively. Some practice patterns regarding FNA/FNB were recommended.

CONCLUSION

This is the first worldwide survey of EUS-FNA and FNB practice patterns. The results showed wide variations in practice patterns. Randomized studies are urgently needed to establish the best approach for optimizing the FNA/FNB procedures.

摘要

背景与目的

内镜超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术(EUS-FNA)和细针活检术(FNB)是广泛用于获取组织的有效技术。然而,如何获取高质量标本仍不明确。因此,我们开展了一项关于EUS-FNA和FNB技术的调查,以确定全球的实践模式,并根据该领域专家的经验制定强有力的建议。

方法

这是一项针对国际超声内镜工作组(ISEUS-TF)成员的全球多机构调查。该调查通过SurveyMonkey网站以电子邮件方式进行。在某些情况下,计算对某些陈述的百分比一致性;在其他情况下,总结获得最多回复的选项。设计了另一份关于推荐水平的问卷来评估受访者的答案。

结果

ISEUS-TF成员编制了一份包含17个问题的问卷,并发送给53位专家。35位专家在规定时间内完成了调查。其中,分别有40%和54.3%的专家每年进行50 - 200次及超过200次EUS采样程序。推荐了一些关于FNA/FNB的实践模式。

结论

这是首次对EUS-FNA和FNB实践模式进行的全球调查。结果显示实践模式存在很大差异。迫切需要进行随机研究以确定优化FNA/FNB程序的最佳方法。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索