Ito T, Okabayashi M, Osada Y, Wakamiya N, Kato S
Department of Pathology, Osaka University, Japan.
In Vivo. 1988 Sep-Oct;2(5):325-9.
We compared antitumor effectiveness of two types of tumor vaccine modified with vaccinia virus (VV). One type is UV-inactivated VV (UV-VV) -absorbed tumor cell vaccine (UV-VV TCV) produced by tumor cells that had been absorbed in vitro with UV-VV and subsequently X-irradiated with 10(4) rads. The other type is vaccinia oncolysate vaccine (VOV) from tumor cells that had been infected in vitro with live VV and subsequently sonicated. C3H/HeN mice were inoculated i.p. with UV-VV after whole body X-irradiation with 150 rads. After 3 weeks, the two kinds of vaccine were administered i.p. 3 times at weekly intervals. One week after the last injection, mice were challenged i.p. with syngeneic MH134 or X5563 viable tumor cells at different doses. The fifty percent tumor lethal doses (TLD50) of MH134 in mice treated with UV-VV TCV and VOV were 10(6.6) and 10(5.3), respectively, whereas the TLD50 of MH134 in non-treated mice was 10(0.6). The TLD50 of X5563 in mice treated with UV-VV TCV and VOV were 10(6.5) and 10(4.4), respectively, while the TLD50 of X5563 in non-treated mice was 10(0.5). These results show that UV-VV TCV is more effective than VOV. We suggest that the complete cell structure of the vaccine is more effective for enhancing tumor immunity.
我们比较了两种用痘苗病毒(VV)修饰的肿瘤疫苗的抗肿瘤效果。一种是紫外线灭活的痘苗病毒(UV-VV)吸附肿瘤细胞疫苗(UV-VV TCV),它是由肿瘤细胞制成,这些肿瘤细胞在体外被UV-VV吸附,随后用10⁴拉德的X射线照射。另一种是痘苗溶瘤疫苗(VOV),它来自于在体外被活痘苗病毒感染并随后进行超声处理的肿瘤细胞。对C3H/HeN小鼠进行150拉德的全身X射线照射后,经腹腔注射UV-VV。3周后,每隔一周经腹腔注射这两种疫苗3次。在最后一次注射后1周,给小鼠经腹腔注射不同剂量的同基因MH134或X5563活肿瘤细胞进行攻击。用UV-VV TCV和VOV处理的小鼠中,MH134的半数肿瘤致死剂量(TLD50)分别为10⁶·⁶和10⁵·³,而未处理小鼠中MH134的TLD50为10⁰·⁶。用UV-VV TCV和VOV处理的小鼠中,X5563的TLD50分别为10⁶·⁵和10⁴·⁴,而未处理小鼠中X5563的TLD50为10⁰·⁵。这些结果表明,UV-VV TCV比VOV更有效。我们认为疫苗的完整细胞结构在增强肿瘤免疫方面更有效。