Zhao Hongmou, Zhang Yan, Hu Dong, Liang Xiaojun, Li Yi, Lu Jun, Wang Junhu
Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an Shaanxi, 710054, P.R.China.
Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an Shaanxi, 710054,
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 May 15;31(5):553-558. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201612046.
To investigate the functional outcomes of buttress plate fixation and simple screws fixation for the treatment of supination-adduction type-II medial malleolar fractures so as to provide reference for selection of internal fixation.
Between March 2009 and December 2012, 53 patients with supination-adduction type-II medial malleolar fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Of them, buttress plate fixation was used in 30 cases (buttress plate fixation group), and screws fixation was used in 23 cases (screw fixation group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, injury cause, injury side, disease duration, and combined injuries between 2 groups ( >0.05). Complications and full weight-bearing time were recorded; the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score and the visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the functional outcomes. Post-operative anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films were taken to evaluate fracture reduction and union condition. And the treatment failures were recorded.
There was no significant difference in incision related complication rate and infection rate between 2 groups ( >0.05). The patients were followed up 46-91 months (mean, 64.5 months) in buttress plate fixation group and 44-86 months (mean, 59.5 months) in screw fixation group. The full weight-bearing time of the buttress plate fixation group was significantly shorter than that of screw fixation group ( =2.05, =0.04). During follow-up time, malunion and nonunion occurred in 2 cases and 1 case of screw fixation group; anatomic reduction and bony union were observed in the other patients of 2 groups. The union time showed no significant difference between 2 groups ( =1.06, =0.30). No significant difference was found in AOFAS score and good and excellent rate, VAS score, operation failure rate, and traumatic osteoarthritis rate between groups ( >0.05).
For patients with supination-adduction type-II medial malleolar fracture, the angle between fracture line and tibial axial line is too small to be fixed firmly with simple screws fixation, with a relatively higher failure rate. And buttress plate fixation can reach rigid fixation, and has better functional outcomes.
探讨支撑钢板固定与单纯螺钉固定治疗旋后-内收型Ⅱ度内踝骨折的功能疗效,为内固定方式的选择提供参考。
2009年3月至2012年12月,53例旋后-内收型Ⅱ度内踝骨折患者接受切开复位内固定治疗。其中,30例采用支撑钢板固定(支撑钢板固定组),23例采用螺钉固定(螺钉固定组)。两组患者在年龄、性别、致伤原因、伤侧、病程及合并伤方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。记录并发症及完全负重时间;采用美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)踝-后足评分及视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估功能疗效。术后拍摄踝关节正侧位X线片评估骨折复位及愈合情况,并记录治疗失败病例。
两组切口相关并发症发生率及感染率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。支撑钢板固定组患者随访46~91个月(平均64.5个月),螺钉固定组患者随访44~86个月(平均59.5个月)。支撑钢板固定组完全负重时间显著短于螺钉固定组(t=2.05,P=0.04)。随访期间,螺钉固定组发生2例畸形愈合、1例骨不连;两组其他患者均获得解剖复位及骨性愈合。两组愈合时间差异无统计学意义(t=1.06,P=0.30)。两组间AOFAS评分及优良率、VAS评分、手术失败率及创伤性骨关节炎发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
对于旋后-内收型Ⅱ度内踝骨折患者,骨折线与胫骨轴线夹角过小,单纯螺钉固定难以牢固固定,失败率相对较高。支撑钢板固定可达到坚强固定,功能疗效更佳。