Shen Kai, Tan Zujian, Yang Fubin, Zhang Shengli, Cao Daigui
Department of Spine Surgery, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing, 400013, P.R.China.
Department of Spine Surgery, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing, 400013,
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jun 15;31(6):677-682. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201701092.
To determine the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of common pedicle screw placement under direct vision combined with dome shaped decompression via small incision for double segment thoracolumbar fracture with nerve injury.
A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 32 patients with double segment thoracolumbar fracture with nerve injury undergoing common pedicle screw placement under direct vision combined with dome shaped decompression via small incision between November 2011 and November 2015 (combined surgery group), and another 32 patients undergoing traditional open pedicle screw fixation surgery (traditional surgery group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, time of injury-to-surgery, injury segments and Frankel classification of neurological function between two groups ( >0.05). The length of soft tissue dissection, the operative time, the blood loss during surgery, the postoperative drainage, the visual analogue scale (VAS) of incision after surgery, and recovery of neurological function after surgery were evaluated.
All cases were followed up 9 to 12 months (mean, 10.5 months) in combined surgery group, and 8 to 12 months (mean, 9.8 months) in traditional surgery group. The length of soft tissue dissection, the operative time, the blood loss during surgery, the postoperative drainage, and the postoperative VAS score in the combined surgery group were significantly better than those in the traditional surgery group ( <0.05). Dural rupture during surgery and pedicle screw pulling-out at 6 months after surgery occurred in 2 cases and 1 case of the combined surgery group; dural rupture during surgery occurred in 1 case of the traditional surgery group. The X-ray films showed good decompression, and fracture healing; A certain degree of neurological function recovery was achieved in two groups.
Common pedicle screw placement under direct vision combined with dome shaped decompression via small incision can significantly reduce iatrogenic trauma and provide good nerve decompression. Therefore, it is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive treatment method for double segment thoracolumbar fracture with neurological injury.
探讨直视下普通椎弓根螺钉置入联合小切口穹顶状减压治疗双节段胸腰椎骨折并神经损伤的可行性、安全性及疗效。
回顾性分析2011年11月至2015年11月期间32例双节段胸腰椎骨折并神经损伤患者行直视下普通椎弓根螺钉置入联合小切口穹顶状减压手术(联合手术组)以及另外32例行传统开放椎弓根螺钉内固定手术患者(传统手术组)的临床资料。两组患者在性别、年龄、受伤原因、伤后至手术时间、损伤节段及神经功能Frankel分级等方面比较,差异均无统计学意义(>0.05)。评估两组患者的软组织剥离长度、手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后切口视觉模拟评分(VAS)以及术后神经功能恢复情况。
联合手术组所有病例随访9~12个月(平均10.5个月),传统手术组随访8~12个月(平均9.8个月)。联合手术组的软组织剥离长度、手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量及术后VAS评分均明显优于传统手术组(<0.05)。联合手术组术中硬脊膜破裂2例,术后6个月椎弓根螺钉拔出1例;传统手术组术中硬脊膜破裂1例。X线片显示减压良好,骨折愈合;两组均有一定程度的神经功能恢复。
直视下普通椎弓根螺钉置入联合小切口穹顶状减压可显著减少医源性创伤,提供良好的神经减压效果。因此,是治疗双节段胸腰椎骨折并神经损伤的一种安全、有效且微创的治疗方法。