Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts; Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, Massachusetts.
Heart Center Research, Huntsville, Alabama.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 May;4(5):580-588. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
This study sought to determine whether uninterrupted apixaban would have similar rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events as does minimally interrupted apixaban at the time of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and to compare those results with rates in historical patients treated with uninterrupted warfarin.
The safety, efficacy, and optimal dosing regimen for apixaban at the time of AF ablation are uncertain.
This prospective, multicenter clinical trial enrolled 306 patients undergoing catheter ablation for nonvalvular AF and randomized 300 to uninterrupted versus minimally interrupted (holding 1 dose) periprocedural apixaban. A retrospective cohort of patients treated with uninterrupted warfarin at the same centers was matched to the apixaban-treated subjects for comparison. Endpoints included clinically significant bleeding, major bleeding, and nonhemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism (SE) from the time of ablation through 30 days.
There were no stroke or SE events. Clinically significant bleeding occurred in 11.3% of 150 evaluable patients on uninterrupted apixaban and 9.7% of 145 evaluable patients on interrupted apixaban (risk difference: 1.7% [95% confidence interval: -5.5% to 8.8%]; p = NS). Rates of major bleeding were 1.3% with uninterrupted apixaban, and 2.1% with interrupted (risk difference: -0.7%; p = NS). The rates of clinically significant and major bleeding were similar for all apixaban patients combined (10.5% and 1.7%), compared with the matched warfarin group (9.8% and 1.4%).
Both uninterrupted and minimally interrupted apixaban at the time of AF ablation were associated with a very low rate of thromboembolic events, and rates of both major (<2%) and clinically significant bleeding were similar to uninterrupted warfarin. (Apixaban Evaluation of Interrupted Or Uninterrupted Anticoagulation for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation [AEIOU]; NCT02608099).
本研究旨在确定在房颤消融时,持续应用阿哌沙班与间断应用(停药 1 剂)阿哌沙班相比,出血和血栓栓塞事件的发生率是否相似,并与接受持续华法林治疗的历史患者的发生率进行比较。
阿哌沙班在房颤消融时的安全性、有效性和最佳剂量方案尚不确定。
这项前瞻性、多中心临床试验纳入了 306 例因非瓣膜性房颤而行导管消融的患者,并将 300 例患者随机分为持续组和间断组(术中各停药 1 剂)。同期同一中心接受持续华法林治疗的患者作为历史对照匹配至阿哌沙班组进行比较。终点事件包括从消融开始至 30 天的临床显著出血、大出血和非出血性卒中和全身性栓塞(SE)。
无卒中和 SE 事件。持续组 150 例可评估患者中有 11.3%发生临床显著出血,间断组 145 例可评估患者中有 9.7%发生(风险差异:1.7%[95%置信区间:-5.5%~8.8%];p=NS)。持续组大出血发生率为 1.3%,间断组为 2.1%(风险差异:-0.7%;p=NS)。所有阿哌沙班组患者的临床显著出血和大出血发生率相似(分别为 10.5%和 1.7%),与匹配的华法林组相似(分别为 9.8%和 1.4%)。
房颤消融时持续应用和间断应用阿哌沙班均与血栓栓塞事件发生率极低相关,且大出血(<2%)和临床显著出血的发生率与持续应用华法林相似。(阿哌沙班评价中断或不中断抗凝治疗房颤消融试验[AEIOU];NCT02608099)。