• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者导航与林奇综合征筛查计划中的护理协调的关联。

Association of patient navigation with care coordination in an Lynch syndrome screening program.

机构信息

Cancer Risk and Prevention Program, Maine Medical Center, Scarborough, ME, USA.

Maine-Dartmouth Family Medicine Residency, MaineGeneral Health, Augusta, ME, USA.

出版信息

Transl Behav Med. 2018 May 23;8(3):450-455. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx078.

DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibx078
PMID:29800403
Abstract

Lynch syndrome (LS) identification leads to improved health outcomes. Universal tumor screening (UTS) facilitates LS identification among colorectal cancer (CRC) and uterine cancer (UC) cases; institutional management affects screening program implementation and outcomes. There has been limited study of institutional UTS program care coordination needs, including patient navigation of genetic counseling referrals. We examined the influence of patient navigators on access to cancer genetic services among LS UTS screen-positive cases within a single institution. Electronic health record review of screen-positive CRC and UC cases for a 12-month period assessed the relationship between patient navigation and follow-through to genetic services. Among 451 newly diagnosed CRC (n = 175) and UC (n = 276) cases, 96 (21%; 28 CRC/68 UC cases) had abnormal UTS results. Among these, 66 (69%) showed MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (i.e., screen-negative). Of 30 screen-positive cases, 16 (53%) received navigation services. Among these, 14/16 (88%) and 13/14 (81%) underwent genetic counseling and testing, respectively; 7/13 (54%) had pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants detected. Among non-navigated screen-positive patients, 2/14 (14%) were excluded due to incomplete UTS results. Five of the remaining 12 cases (42%) sought genetic counseling, 4/12 (33%) underwent genetic testing; 1/4 (25%) tested positive for a pathogenic variant. The difference in navigated (88%) versus non-navigated cases (42%) undergoing genetic counseling was statistically significant (p = .02). Patient navigation was associated with follow-through to genetic counseling and testing services among LS screen-positive cases. This model deserves additional prospective investigation to confirm these findings and to assess their generalizability.

摘要

林奇综合征(LS)的鉴定可改善健康结果。广泛的肿瘤筛查(UTS)有助于在结直肠癌(CRC)和子宫癌(UC)病例中鉴定 LS;机构管理影响筛查计划的实施和结果。对于机构 UTS 计划的护理协调需求,包括患者遗传咨询转介的导航,研究有限。我们研究了患者导航员对单一机构内 LS UTS 筛查阳性病例获得癌症遗传服务的影响。对 12 个月期间的筛查阳性 CRC 和 UC 病例进行电子健康记录审查,评估了患者导航与遗传服务的跟进之间的关系。在 451 例新诊断的 CRC(n = 175)和 UC(n = 276)病例中,96 例(21%;28 例 CRC/68 例 UC 病例)有异常 UTS 结果。其中,66 例(69%)显示 MLH1 启动子甲基化(即筛查阴性)。在 30 例筛查阳性病例中,有 16 例(53%)接受了导航服务。其中,14/16(88%)和 13/14(81%)分别接受了遗传咨询和检测;7/13(54%)检测到致病性或可能致病性变异。在未接受导航的筛查阳性患者中,由于 UTS 结果不完整,有 2/14(14%)被排除。在其余的 12 例中,有 5 例(42%)寻求遗传咨询,12/12(100%)进行了基因检测;4/4(100%)检测到致病性变异。接受导航的病例(88%)与未接受导航的病例(42%)在接受遗传咨询方面的差异具有统计学意义(p =.02)。患者导航与 LS 筛查阳性病例遗传咨询和检测服务的跟进相关。这种模式值得进一步进行前瞻性研究,以确认这些发现并评估其普遍性。

相似文献

1
Association of patient navigation with care coordination in an Lynch syndrome screening program.患者导航与林奇综合征筛查计划中的护理协调的关联。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 May 23;8(3):450-455. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx078.
2
Initiation of universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients as a model for the implementation of genetic information into clinical oncology practice.对结直肠癌患者开展林奇综合征的普遍肿瘤筛查,以此作为将基因信息应用于临床肿瘤学实践的范例。
Cancer. 2016 Feb 1;122(3):393-401. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29758. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
3
Universal tumor screening for lynch syndrome on colorectal cancer biopsies impacts surgical treatment decisions.结直肠癌活检的林奇综合征泛肿瘤筛查会影响手术治疗决策。
Fam Cancer. 2023 Jan;22(1):71-76. doi: 10.1007/s10689-022-00302-3. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
4
Challenges in the diagnosis and management of Lynch Syndrome in an Indigenous family living in a remote West Australian community.西澳大利亚偏远社区一个原住民家庭中林奇综合征诊断与管理面临的挑战。
Rural Remote Health. 2011;11(4):1836. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
5
Identifying patients with Lynch syndrome using a universal tumor screening program in an integrated healthcare system.在综合医疗保健系统中,通过通用肿瘤筛查计划识别林奇综合征患者。
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2022 Apr 18;20(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13053-022-00217-1.
6
Impact of an immunohistochemistry-based universal screening protocol for Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancer on genetic counseling and testing.基于免疫组织化学的子宫内膜癌林奇综合征通用筛查方案对遗传咨询和检测的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Apr;137(1):7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.01.535. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
7
Comparing universal Lynch syndrome tumor-screening programs to evaluate associations between implementation strategies and patient follow-through.比较通用的林奇综合征肿瘤筛查项目,以评估实施策略与患者后续跟进之间的关联。
Genet Med. 2014 Oct;16(10):773-82. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.31. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
8
Impact of routine mismatch repair screening on genetic counseling and surgical management in colorectal cancer patients.常规错配修复检测对结直肠癌患者遗传咨询和手术管理的影响。
Am J Surg. 2021 Aug;222(2):408-412. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.12.017. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
9
Success of referral to genetic counseling after positive lynch syndrome screening test.林奇综合征筛查试验呈阳性后转诊至遗传咨询的成功率。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Sep;32(9):1345-1348. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2849-x. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
10
Implementation of tumor testing for lynch syndrome in endometrial cancers at a large academic medical center.在一家大型学术医疗中心实施子宫内膜癌的林奇综合征肿瘤检测。
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Jul;130(1):121-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.022. Epub 2013 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Lynch syndrome detection: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a hybrid type III effectiveness-implementation trial.改善林奇综合征检测:一项混合型III期有效性-实施试验的混合方法过程评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):1552. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11857-5.
2
Experiences across a genetic screening and testing programme pathway: a qualitative study of mammogram patient perspectives.遗传筛查和检测计划路径中的体验:对乳房 X 光照片患者观点的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 23;14(10):e089884. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089884.
3
"Go ahead and screen" - advice to healthcare systems for routine lynch syndrome screening from interviews with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients.
“继续进行筛查”——对医疗系统的建议,基于对新诊断的结直肠癌患者的访谈得出的关于林奇综合征常规筛查的建议 。
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2023 Nov 17;21(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13053-023-00270-4.
4
A practical method for integrating community priorities in planning and implementing cancer control programs.一种将社区优先事项纳入癌症控制规划和实施的实用方法。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(Suppl 1):113-123. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01688-w. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
5
Primary and Secondary Prevention Interventions to Reduce Risk Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer in High-Risk Groups: a Systematic Literature Review.高风险人群结直肠癌相关风险因素的一级和二级预防干预措施:系统文献回顾。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Jun;38(3):738-751. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02273-0. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
6
Protocol to evaluate a pilot program to upskill clinicians in providing genetic testing for familial melanoma.评价一个提高临床医生提供家族性黑色素瘤基因检测技能的试点项目的方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 7;17(12):e0275926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275926. eCollection 2022.
7
Attitudes of Australian dermatologists on the use of genetic testing: A cross-sectional survey with a focus on melanoma.澳大利亚皮肤科医生对基因检测使用情况的态度:一项以黑色素瘤为重点的横断面调查。
Front Genet. 2022 Oct 24;13:919134. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.919134. eCollection 2022.
8
Coordination Models for Cancer Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.中低收入国家癌症护理的协调模式:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 28;19(13):7906. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137906.
9
Systemic Barriers to Risk-Reducing Interventions for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Implications for Health Care Inequities.遗传性癌症综合征风险降低干预措施的系统性障碍:对医疗保健不公平现象的影响。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Nov 3;5. doi: 10.1200/PO.21.00233. eCollection 2021.
10
The design, implementation, and effectiveness of intervention strategies aimed at improving genetic referral practices: a systematic review of the literature.旨在改善遗传转介实践的干预策略的设计、实施和效果:文献系统评价。
Genet Med. 2021 Dec;23(12):2239-2249. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01272-0. Epub 2021 Aug 24.