Suppr超能文献

科克伦急性呼吸道感染组的利益相关者参与项目确定了系统评价优先领域。

Cochrane acute respiratory infections group's stakeholder engagement project identified systematic review priority areas.

机构信息

Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.

Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia; Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;102:63-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.016. Epub 2018 May 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cochrane acute respiratory infections (ARIs) group conducts systematic reviews of the evidence for treatment and prevention of ARIs. We report the results of a prioritization project, aiming to identify highest priority systematic review topics.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: The project consisted of two phases. Phase 1 analyzed the gap between existing randomized controlled trials and Cochrane systematic reviews (reported previously). Phase 2 (reported here) consisted of a two-round survey. In round 1, respondents prioritized 68 topics and suggested up to 10 additional topics; in round 2, respondents prioritized top 25 topics from round 1.

RESULTS

Respondents included clinicians, researchers, systematic reviewers, allied health, patients, and carers, from 33 different countries. In round 1, 154 respondents identified 20 priority topics, most commonly selecting topics in nonspecific ARIs, influenza, and common cold. Fifty respondents also collectively suggested 134 additional topics. In round 2, 78 respondents prioritized top 25 topics, most commonly in the areas of nonspecific ARIs, pneumonia, and influenza.

CONCLUSION

We generated a list of priority systematic review topics to guide the Cochrane ARI group's systematic review work for the next 24 months. Stakeholder involvement enhanced the transparency of the process and will increase the usability and relevance of the group's work to stakeholders.

摘要

目的

Cochrane 急性呼吸道感染(ARI)组对 ARI 的治疗和预防措施进行系统评价。我们报告了一个优先级项目的结果,旨在确定最优先的系统评价主题。

研究设计/设置:该项目包括两个阶段。第一阶段分析了现有随机对照试验和 Cochrane 系统评价之间的差距(先前报道)。第二阶段(此处报道)由两轮调查组成。在第一轮中,受访者对 68 个主题进行了优先级排序,并提出了最多 10 个额外的主题;在第二轮中,受访者对第一轮中的前 25 个主题进行了优先级排序。

结果

受访者包括来自 33 个不同国家的临床医生、研究人员、系统评价人员、辅助医疗人员、患者和护理人员。在第一轮中,154 名受访者确定了 20 个优先主题,最常见的选择是非特异性 ARI、流感和普通感冒的主题。50 名受访者还共同提出了 134 个额外的主题。在第二轮中,78 名受访者对前 25 个主题进行了优先级排序,最常见的是在非特异性 ARI、肺炎和流感领域。

结论

我们生成了一份优先系统评价主题清单,以指导 Cochrane ARI 组在未来 24 个月内的系统评价工作。利益相关者的参与提高了该过程的透明度,并将提高该小组工作对利益相关者的可用性和相关性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验