• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“利益相关者”:在健康研究与政策背景下取代“利益攸关方”的一个新术语。

"Interest-holders": A new term to replace "stakeholders" in the context of health research and policy.

作者信息

Akl Elie A, Khabsa Joanne, Petkovic Jennifer, Magwood Olivia, Lytvyn Lyubov, Motilall Ashley, Campbell Pauline, Todhunter-Brown Alex, Schünemann Holger J, Welch Vivian, Tugwell Peter, Concannon Thomas W

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine American University of Beirut Beirut Lebanon.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI) McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.

出版信息

Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2024 Oct 29;2(11):e70007. doi: 10.1002/cesm.70007. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.1002/cesm.70007
PMID:40475280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11795957/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Given the colonial connotations of the term "stakeholder", its continued use may be perceived as disrespectful to Indigenous Peoples. While several groups have introduced alternative terms, each has its own limitations. The objective of this article is to introduce "interest-holders" as an alternative term to "stakeholders" and describe the discussions underpinning the adoption of the new term by the MuSE Consortium.

METHODS

The MuSE Consortium is an international network of over 160 individuals with interest and expertise in different aspects relevant to engagement in research. Members of MuSE explored alternative terms and considered their respective merits and limitations. The deliberations considered the literature on the topic and the results of two consultations with the wider MuSE membership on the alternative terms.

RESULTS

We define "interest-holders" as groups with legitimate interests in the health issue under consideration. The interests arise and draw their legitimacy from the fact that people from these groups are responsible for or affected by health-related decisions that can be informed by research evidence.

CONCLUSION

As groups other than the MuSE Consortium have started to adopt "interest-holders," we hope its use will reduce confusion related to the multitude of terms used and convey the intended meaning without any negative connotations.

摘要

背景

鉴于“利益相关者”一词具有殖民内涵,继续使用该词可能被视为对原住民的不尊重。虽然有几个团体引入了替代术语,但每个术语都有其自身的局限性。本文的目的是引入“利益持有者”作为“利益相关者”的替代术语,并描述MuSE联盟采用这一新术语的相关讨论。

方法

MuSE联盟是一个由160多名在研究参与相关不同方面拥有兴趣和专业知识的个人组成的国际网络。MuSE的成员探索了替代术语,并考虑了它们各自的优缺点。审议过程参考了该主题的文献以及就替代术语与更广泛的MuSE成员进行的两次磋商结果。

结果

我们将“利益持有者”定义为对所考虑的健康问题具有合法利益的群体。这些利益产生并源于这样一个事实,即这些群体中的人对可由研究证据提供信息的与健康相关的决策负责或受到其影响。

结论

由于除MuSE联盟之外的其他团体已开始采用“利益持有者”,我们希望它的使用将减少与众多使用的术语相关的混淆,并在没有任何负面含义的情况下传达预期含义。

相似文献

1
"Interest-holders": A new term to replace "stakeholders" in the context of health research and policy.“利益相关者”:在健康研究与政策背景下取代“利益攸关方”的一个新术语。
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2024 Oct 29;2(11):e70007. doi: 10.1002/cesm.70007. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Guidance for engagement in health guideline development: A scoping review.参与健康指南制定的指导意见:一项范围综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 25;20(4):e70006. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70006. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
The GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist extension for engagement.用于参与的GIN-麦克马斯特指南制定清单扩展版
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 May;181:111727. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111727. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
5
PROTOCOL: Barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in health guideline development: A qualitative evidence synthesis.方案:利益相关者参与健康指南制定的障碍与促进因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 25;18(2):e1237. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1237. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Paper 6: engaging racially and ethnically diverse interest holders in evidence syntheses.论文6:让不同种族和族裔的利益相关者参与证据综合工作。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Dec;176:111575. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111575. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
7
8
Using the UK standards for public involvement to evaluate the public involvement sections of annual reports from NIHR managed research centres.使用英国公众参与标准来评估英国国家卫生研究院管理的研究中心年度报告中的公众参与部分。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Nov 30;9(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00517-3.
9
Key issues for stakeholder engagement in the development of health and healthcare guidelines.利益相关者参与健康与医疗保健指南制定过程中的关键问题。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 28;9(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00433-6.
10
Factors to Consider During Identification and Invitation of Individuals in a Multi-stakeholder Research Partnership.多利益相关者研究伙伴关系中识别和邀请个人时需要考虑的因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Dec;37(16):4047-4053. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07411-w. Epub 2022 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the reporting on health equity in observational research (STROBE-Equity): extension checklist and elaboration.改进观察性研究中健康公平性的报告(STROBE-公平性):扩展清单及阐述
BMJ. 2025 Sep 3;390:e083882. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-083882.
2
Writing about health inequality: recommendations for accurate and impactful presentation of evidence.撰写关于健康不平等的文章:准确且有影响力地呈现证据的建议。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Sep 2;24(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02548-6.
3
"I Believe That AI Will Recognize the Problem Before It Happens": Qualitative Study Exploring Young Adults' Perceptions of AI in Mental Health Care.“我相信人工智能会在问题发生之前识别出来”:探索年轻人对人工智能在心理健康护理中认知的定性研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Aug 25;12:e76973. doi: 10.2196/76973.
4
Maximising Embedded Pharmacists in AGed CAre Medication Advisory Committees (MEGA-MAC): protocol for implementing Australia's new guiding principles for medication management in residential aged care facilities using knowledge brokers and a national quality improvement collaborative.在老年护理药物咨询委员会中最大化嵌入式药剂师(MEGA-MAC):利用知识经纪人及全国质量改进协作组织实施澳大利亚针对老年护理机构药物管理的新指导原则的方案
Implement Sci. 2025 Aug 4;20(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01449-0.
5
Informed Consent for Newborn Genomic Screening: Interest-Holder Perspectives on Dynamic Consent in an Evolving Landscape.新生儿基因组筛查知情同意书:利益相关者对不断变化形势下动态同意的看法。
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2025 May 28;11(2):41. doi: 10.3390/ijns11020041.

本文引用的文献

1
Paper 6: engaging racially and ethnically diverse interest holders in evidence syntheses.论文6:让不同种族和族裔的利益相关者参与证据综合工作。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Dec;176:111575. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111575. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
2
A new taxonomy is proposed for defining the interests of stakeholders' representatives in health research: the case of guideline development.提出了一种新的分类法,用于界定卫生研究中利益相关者代表的利益:以指南制定为例。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Aug;160:147-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.06.006. Epub 2023 Jun 11.
3
Key issues for stakeholder engagement in the development of health and healthcare guidelines.利益相关者参与健康与医疗保健指南制定过程中的关键问题。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 28;9(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00433-6.
4
Moving from consultation to co-creation with knowledge users in scoping reviews: guidance from the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group.从咨询转向与知识使用者共同创作:来自 JBI 范围综述方法学小组的指导。
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Apr 1;20(4):969-979. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00416.
5
The ethical challenges and opportunities of implementing engagement strategies in health research.实施健康研究参与策略的伦理挑战与机遇。
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;59:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
6
The importance of measuring the impact of patient-oriented research.衡量以患者为导向的研究的影响的重要性。
CMAJ. 2019 Aug 6;191(31):E860-E864. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.190237.
7
Patient and Public Engagement in Integrated Knowledge Translation Research: Are we there yet?患者及公众参与整合知识转化研究:我们做到了吗?
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Feb 12;5:8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0139-1. eCollection 2019.
8
Cochrane acute respiratory infections group's stakeholder engagement project identified systematic review priority areas.科克伦急性呼吸道感染组的利益相关者参与项目确定了系统评价优先领域。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;102:63-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.016. Epub 2018 May 22.
9
The power of symbolic capital in patient and public involvement in health research.象征资本在健康研究中患者和公众参与的力量。
Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):836-844. doi: 10.1111/hex.12519. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
10
User involvement in a Cochrane systematic review: using structured methods to enhance the clinical relevance, usefulness and usability of a systematic review update.用户参与Cochrane系统评价:运用结构化方法提升系统评价更新的临床相关性、实用性和易用性。
Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 20;4:55. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0023-5.