• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国恶性胸膜间皮瘤调强放疗的应用。

Utilization of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.

出版信息

Clin Lung Cancer. 2018 Sep;19(5):e685-e692. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.04.019. Epub 2018 May 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.cllc.2018.04.019
PMID:29803576
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has historically been delivered using 3-dimensional conformal RT (3DCRT) techniques, multiple reports show noteworthy safety and efficacy of the more advanced intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). To our knowledge, this is the only known study to evaluate national practice patterns of IMRT utilization for MPM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base was queried for newly-diagnosed MPM patients who underwent definitive surgery (extrapleural pneumonectomy [EPP] or extended pleurectomy/decortication [P/D]) followed by adjuvant RT. Patients with metastatic disease, non-EPP or P/D surgical techniques, and lack of RT receipt (or without specified RT technique) were excluded. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) analysis, and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

Overall, 286 patients met criteria (181 [63%] IMRT and 105 [37%] 3DCRT). Temporal trends revealed that although 3DCRT was more common at initial time periods, IMRT utilization rose from 2004 to 2007 and stayed as a relatively constant majority thereafter. This was also present when substratifying the cohort according to EPP versus P/D approaches. IMRT was more often delivered at academic centers, along with institutions in the Southern United States, whereas 3DCRT was more frequently utilized in community facilities and in the Northeast (P ≤ .05 for all). RT technique did not affect OS (P > .05 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSION

In the United States, IMRT is now the most commonly utilized adjuvant RT technique for MPM. Facility and regional differences might associate with IMRT delivery. The findings of this investigation have implications for insurance coverage, clinical referral patterns, and ongoing and future prospective trial design.

摘要

背景

尽管恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)的术后放疗(RT)历史上一直采用三维适形放疗(3DCRT)技术,但多项报告表明,更先进的调强放疗(IMRT)具有显著的安全性和疗效。据我们所知,这是唯一一项评估 IMRT 用于 MPM 的国家实践模式的研究。

材料和方法

国家癌症数据库(National Cancer Data Base)对接受根治性手术(胸膜外全肺切除术[EPP]或广泛胸膜切除术/剥脱术[P/D])后接受辅助 RT 的新诊断 MPM 患者进行了查询。排除患有转移性疾病、非 EPP 或 P/D 手术技术以及缺乏 RT 接受(或未指定 RT 技术)的患者。统计分析包括多变量逻辑回归、Kaplan-Meier 总生存(OS)分析和 Cox 比例风险建模。

结果

共有 286 名患者符合标准(181 名[63%]接受 IMRT,105 名[37%]接受 3DCRT)。时间趋势显示,尽管 3DCRT 在最初的时间段更为常见,但 IMRT 的使用从 2004 年到 2007 年上升,并在此后保持相对稳定的多数。根据 EPP 与 P/D 方法对队列进行分层时也是如此。IMRT 更常在学术中心以及美国南部的机构中进行,而 3DCRT 则更常在社区设施和东北部进行(所有 P 值均<.05)。RT 技术对 OS 没有影响(所有比较的 P 值均>.05)。

结论

在美国,IMRT 现在是 MPM 最常用的辅助 RT 技术。设施和区域差异可能与 IMRT 的应用有关。本研究的结果对保险覆盖范围、临床转诊模式以及正在进行和未来的前瞻性试验设计具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Utilization of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in the United States.美国恶性胸膜间皮瘤调强放疗的应用。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2018 Sep;19(5):e685-e692. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.04.019. Epub 2018 May 5.
2
Hemithoracic intensity modulated radiation therapy after pleurectomy/decortication for malignant pleural mesothelioma: toxicity, patterns of failure, and a matched survival analysis.恶性胸膜间皮瘤胸膜切除术/胸膜剥脱术后的半胸强度调制放射治疗:毒性、失败模式及配对生存分析
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jan 1;91(1):149-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.08.343. Epub 2014 Oct 25.
3
Long-term outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy following extra-pleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma.恶性胸膜间皮瘤行胸膜外肺切除术后调强放疗的长期疗效
Acta Oncol. 2017 Jul;56(7):957-962. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1279749. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
4
Failure patterns after hemithoracic pleural intensity modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma.恶性胸膜间皮瘤半胸部胸膜调强放疗后的失败模式。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Oct 1;90(2):394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.032. Epub 2014 Jul 26.
5
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy is a safe and effective treatment for localized malignant pleural mesothelioma.调强放疗是局部恶性胸膜间皮瘤的一种安全有效的治疗方法。
Thorac Cancer. 2018 Nov;9(11):1470-1475. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12860. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
6
Clinical outcome of postoperative highly conformal versus 3D conformal radiotherapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者术后高剂量适形放疗与三维适形放疗的临床疗效
Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jan 24;9:32. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-32.
7
National Cancer Database Report on Pneumonectomy Versus Lung-Sparing Surgery for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.国家癌症数据库报告:肺切除术与肺保留手术治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤的比较。
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Nov;12(11):1704-1714. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.08.012. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
8
Improved Outcomes with Modern Lung-Sparing Trimodality Therapy in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.现代保肺三联疗法治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者的疗效改善
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Jun;12(6):993-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.02.026. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
9
Combined photon and electron three-dimensional conformal versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy with integrated boost for adjuvant treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma after pleuropneumonectomy.胸膜肺切除术后联合光子和电子三维适形放疗与调强放疗并同步加量辅助治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Dec 1;69(5):1593-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2370. Epub 2007 Oct 10.
10
Impact of induction therapy on postoperative outcome after extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma: does induction-accelerated hemithoracic radiation increase the surgical risk?诱导治疗对恶性胸膜间皮瘤胸膜外全肺切除术后结局的影响:诱导加速半胸放疗是否会增加手术风险?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Sep;50(3):433-8. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw074. Epub 2016 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Pleural mesothelioma.胸膜间皮瘤
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025 Aug 7;11(1):56. doi: 10.1038/s41572-025-00640-3.
2
Safety and efficacy of helical tomotherapy following lung-sparing surgery in locally advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma.螺旋断层放疗联合同步化疗保肺手术治疗局部晚期恶性胸膜间皮瘤的安全性和有效性。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2024 Jul;200(7):605-613. doi: 10.1007/s00066-023-02174-7. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
3
Training and validation of a knowledge-based dose-volume histogram predictive model in the optimisation of intensity-modulated proton and volumetric modulated arc photon plans for pleural mesothelioma patients.
基于知识的剂量-体积直方图预测模型在优化胸膜间皮瘤患者调强质子和容积调强弧形光子计划中的训练和验证。
Radiat Oncol. 2022 Aug 26;17(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13014-022-02119-x.
4
Dosimetric evaluation of helical tomotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a planning study for dose escalation.螺旋断层放射治疗和容积调强弧形放疗用于恶性胸膜间皮瘤的剂量学评估:剂量递增的计划研究
Transl Cancer Res. 2021 Feb;10(2):914-922. doi: 10.21037/tcr-20-2452.
5
GOECP/SEOR clinical guidelines on radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma.GOECP/SEOR 恶性胸膜间皮瘤放射治疗临床指南
World J Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug 24;12(8):581-608. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i8.581.
6
Quantitation and predictors of short-term mortality following extrapleural pneumonectomy, pleurectomy/decortication, and nonoperative management for malignant pleural mesothelioma.恶性胸膜间皮瘤经胸膜外肺切除术、胸膜切除术/纤维板剥脱术及非手术治疗后的短期死亡率定量分析及预测因素
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Nov;12(11):6476-6493. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-1779.
7
Physician And Patient Barriers To Radiotherapy Service Access: Treatment Referral Implications.放疗服务获取中医生和患者面临的障碍:治疗转诊的影响
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Oct 7;11:8829-8833. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S168941. eCollection 2019.
8
A Novel Prospective Study Assessing the Combination of Photodynamic Therapy and Proton Radiation Therapy: Safety and Outcomes When Treating Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.一项评估光动力疗法联合质子放射治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤的安全性和疗效的前瞻性研究。
Photochem Photobiol. 2019 Jan;95(1):411-418. doi: 10.1111/php.13065. Epub 2018 Dec 28.