University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Resuscitation. 2018 Aug;129:6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.05.028. Epub 2018 May 24.
Intra-resuscitation antiarrhythmic drugs may improve resuscitation outcomes, in part by avoiding rearrest, a condition associated with poor out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes. However, antiarrhythmics may also alter defibrillation threshold. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between rearrest and intra-resuscitation antiarrhythmic drugs in the context of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) amiodarone, lidocaine, and placebo (ALPS) trial.
Rearrest rates would be lower in cases treated with amiodarone or lidocaine, versus saline placebo, prior to first return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We also hypothesized antiarrhythmic effects would be quantifiable through analysis of the prehospital electrocardiogram.
We conducted a secondary analysis of the ROC ALPS trial. Cases that first achieved prehospital ROSC after randomized administration of study drug were included in the analysis. Rearrest, defined as loss of pulses following ROSC, was ascertained from emergency medical services records. Rearrest rate was calculated overall, as well as by ALPS treatment group. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to assess the association between treatment group and rearrest, as well as rearrest and both survival to hospital discharge and survival with neurologic function. Amplitude spectrum area, median slope, and centroid frequency of the ventricular fibrillation (VF) ECG were calculated and compared across treatment groups.
A total of 1144 (40.4%) cases with study drug prior to first ROSC were included. Rearrest rate was 44.0% overall; 42.9% for placebo, 45.7% for lidocaine, and 43.0% for amiodarone. In multivariable logistic regression models, ALPS treatment group was not associated with rearrest, though rearrest was associated with poor survival and neurologic outcomes. AMSA and median slope measures of the first available VF were associated with rearrest case status, while median slope and centroid frequency were associated with ALPS treatment group.
Rearrest rates did not differ between antiarrhythmic and placebo treatment groups. ECG waveform characteristics were correlated with treatment group and rearrest. Rearrest was inversely associated with survival and neurologic outcomes.
在复苏过程中使用抗心律失常药物可能会改善复苏效果,部分原因是避免再逮捕,这种情况与院外心脏骤停(OHCA)预后不良有关。然而,抗心律失常药物也可能改变除颤阈值。本研究的目的是调查复苏结果联盟(ROC)胺碘酮、利多卡因和安慰剂(ALPS)试验中再逮捕与复苏过程中使用抗心律失常药物之间的关系。
与生理盐水安慰剂相比,在用胺碘酮或利多卡因治疗的病例中,首次自主循环(ROSC)恢复前的再逮捕率会更低。我们还假设通过分析院前心电图可以量化抗心律失常作用。
我们对 ROC ALPS 试验进行了二次分析。纳入了随机给予研究药物后首次院前 ROSC 的病例。从紧急医疗服务记录中确定再逮捕,定义为 ROSC 后脉搏消失。计算了总体和 ALPS 治疗组的再逮捕率。构建多变量逻辑回归模型,以评估治疗组与再逮捕以及再逮捕与医院出院生存率和神经功能生存率之间的关系。计算并比较了心室颤动(VF)心电图的幅度谱面积、中值斜率和质心频率在治疗组之间的差异。
共纳入 1144 例(40.4%)在首次 ROSC 前接受研究药物的病例。总体再逮捕率为 44.0%;安慰剂组为 42.9%,利多卡因组为 45.7%,胺碘酮组为 43.0%。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,ALPS 治疗组与再逮捕无关,但再逮捕与生存率和神经结局不良相关。首次可用 VF 的 AMSA 和中值斜率测量值与再逮捕病例状态相关,而中值斜率和质心频率与 ALPS 治疗组相关。
抗心律失常药物和安慰剂治疗组的再逮捕率没有差异。心电图波形特征与治疗组和再逮捕有关。再逮捕与生存率和神经结局呈负相关。