Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 175 Cambridge Street, Suite 300, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 175 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Coma Science Group, GIGA Consciousness, University and University Hospital of Liège, Avenue de l'Hôpital 11, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 175 Cambridge Street, Suite 300, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 175 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Aug;129(8):1519-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.04.747. Epub 2018 May 9.
We tested the feasibility of deploying a commercially available EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) to detect consciousness in patients with acute disorders of consciousness (DoC) or locked-in syndrome (LIS).
Ten patients (9 DoC, 1 LIS) and 10 healthy subjects (HS) were enrolled. The BCI utilized oddball auditory evoked potentials, vibrotactile evoked potentials (VTP) and motor imagery (MoI) to assess consciousness. We recorded the assessment completion rate and the time required for assessment, and we calculated the sensitivity and specificity of each paradigm for detecting behavioral signs of consciousness.
All 10 patients completed the assessment, 9 of whom required less than 1 h. The LIS patient reported fatigue before the end of the session. The HS and LIS patient showed more consistent BCI responses than DoC patients, but overall there was no association between BCI responses and behavioral signs of consciousness.
The system is feasible to deploy in the ICU and may confirm consciousness in acute LIS, but it was unreliable in acute DoC.
The accuracy of the paradigms for detecting consciousness must be improved and the duration of the protocol should be shortened before this commercially available BCI is ready for clinical implementation in the ICU in patients with acute DoC.
我们测试了在重症监护病房(ICU)中部署商用基于脑电图的脑机接口(BCI)以检测意识障碍(DOC)或闭锁综合征(LIS)患者意识的可行性。
纳入 10 名患者(9 名 DOC,1 名 LIS)和 10 名健康受试者(HS)。BCI 利用听觉事件相关电位、振动触觉诱发电位(VTP)和运动想象(MoI)来评估意识。我们记录了评估完成率和评估所需的时间,并计算了每个范式检测行为意识迹象的敏感性和特异性。
所有 10 名患者均完成了评估,其中 9 名患者用时不到 1 小时。LIS 患者在疗程结束前报告疲劳。HS 和 LIS 患者的 BCI 反应比 DOC 患者更一致,但总体而言,BCI 反应与行为意识迹象之间没有关联。
该系统可在 ICU 中部署,并可确认急性 LIS 的意识,但在急性 DOC 中不可靠。
在这种商用 BCI 准备好在 ICU 中对急性 DOC 患者进行临床实施之前,必须提高检测意识的范式的准确性,并缩短方案的持续时间。