Suppr超能文献

快速-FAAM 的可靠性、最小可检测变化和反应性。

Reliability, minimal detectable change, and responsiveness of the Quick-FAAM.

机构信息

206A Charles Wethington Building, University of Kentucky, 900 South Limestone Street, Lexington, KY 40536, United States. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/JohannaMHoch.

Room A10, Indiana State University, 567 N 5th Street, Terre Haute, IN 47809, United States.

出版信息

Phys Ther Sport. 2018 Jul;32:269-272. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the test-retest reliability, minimal detectable change (MDC) and responsiveness of the Quick-FAAM in people with chronic ankle instability (CAI).

DESIGN

10-week controlled laboratory study.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 20 adults with self-reported CAI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Participants completed a supervised 4-week intervention. The Quick-FAAM was assessed 4-weeks before the intervention (T1), prior to the first intervention (T2), 24-h post-intervention (T3), and 2-weeks after the intervention (T4). The Quick-FAAM is a 12-item region specific PRO scored on 5-point Likert scale, often reported as a percentage, and a lower percentage indicates decreased ankle function. Test-retest reliability was determined using Intraclass-correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard error of measure (SEM). The MDC was calculated using the equation: SEM*√2. Hedges g effect sizes and associated 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated as a measure of group responsiveness.

RESULTS

The test-retest reliability was clinically acceptable (ICC = 0.82, SEM = 4.56). The MDC was 6.5% and pre-post intervention effect sizes were large between T2-T3 (ES = 1.27, 95%CI:0.59-1.95) and T2-T4 (ES = 1.49, 95%CI:0.79-2.19).

CONCLUSION

The Quick-FAAM demonstrated clinically acceptable reliability and was responsive to treatment. Future research should examine these properties in patients with acute ankle and foot conditions, determine patient acceptability, and clinician feasibility.

摘要

目的

确定慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)患者 Quick-FAAM 的重测信度、最小可检测变化(MDC)和反应度。

设计

10 周对照实验室研究。

地点

实验室。

参与者

共 20 名有慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)自述的成年人。

主要观察指标

参与者完成了为期 4 周的监督干预。Quick-FAAM 在干预前 4 周(T1)、第一次干预前(T2)、干预后 24 小时(T3)和干预后 2 周(T4)进行评估。Quick-FAAM 是一种 12 项区域特定的 PRO,用 5 分李克特量表评分,通常报告为百分比,百分比越低表示踝关节功能下降。重测信度采用组内相关系数(ICC)和测量标准误差(SEM)确定。MDC 用方程计算:SEM*√2。Hedges g 效应大小及其相关 95%置信区间(95%CI)作为组反应性的衡量标准。

结果

重测信度具有临床可接受性(ICC=0.82,SEM=4.56)。MDC 为 6.5%,T2-T3(ES=1.27,95%CI:0.59-1.95)和 T2-T4(ES=1.49,95%CI:0.79-2.19)之间的干预前后效应大小较大。

结论

Quick-FAAM 具有临床可接受的可靠性,对治疗有反应。未来的研究应该在急性踝关节和足部疾病患者中检验这些特性,确定患者的可接受性和临床医生的可行性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验