Suppr超能文献

年轻患者盂肱关节骨侵蚀关节镜稳定术后的临床结果和复发率:盂肱关节骨侵蚀大于和小于 20 的对比研究

Clinical Outcomes and Recurrence Rates After Arthroscopic Stabilization Procedures in Young Patients With a Glenoid Bone Erosion: A Comparative Study Between Glenoid Erosion More and Less Than 20.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Bumin Haeundae Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2018 Aug;34(8):2287-2293. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 May 24.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes and recurrence rates of arthroscopic stabilization procedures in young patients who had recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a glenoid bone erosion more than 20%, and to compare with those in patients with a glenoid bone erosion less than 20%.

METHODS

A total of 161 patients who underwent an arthroscopic stabilization procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with anterior glenoid bone erosions and at least 2 years of follow-up were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the glenoid defect size (group I [32 patients]: erosion >20%, group II [129 patients]: erosion <20%). The clinical outcomes were compared using the American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Rowe score, and sports/recreation activity level between the 2 groups. Postoperative complications including instability recurrence were documented.

RESULTS

The mean glenoid defect size was 22.1 ± 2.1% in group I, and 12.2 ± 3.7% in group II. In group I, clinical outcomes were significantly improved after operation (ASES score: 57.9 ± 14.3 at initial, 88.9 ± 6.2 at the last visit, P = .001; Rowe score: 42.1 ± 15.6 at initial, 87.4 ± 7.6 at the last visit, P = .001). These results were inferior to the clinical outcomes of patients in group II (ASES score: 91.5 ± 12.7, P < .001; Rowe score: 89.3 ± 12.4, P = .01). Postoperative recurrences occurred in 5 patients (15.6%) in group I, whereas patients in group II showed 5.4% of recurrence rate (P = .05). Competent recoveries to sports/recreation activity were achieved in 84.4% of patients in group I.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic stabilization procedures for recurrent anterior shoulder instability in young patients with glenoid bone erosions more than 20% showed satisfactory clinical outcomes and recurrence rate, although these results were inferior to those of patients with glenoid erosions less than 20%. Arthroscopic stabilization procedures can be applied as the primary treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a large glenoid bone erosion for functional restoration and return to previous sports activity level.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

摘要

目的

评估盂肱前不稳伴盂骨缺损>20%的年轻患者行关节镜下稳定术的临床疗效和复发率,并与盂骨缺损<20%的患者进行比较。

方法

回顾性分析 2006 年 1 月至 2017 年 1 月间因盂肱前不稳行关节镜下稳定术且至少随访 2 年的 161 例患者资料。根据盂骨缺损大小将患者分为两组:盂骨缺损>20%(32 例)为 A 组,盂骨缺损<20%(129 例)为 B 组。比较两组患者的美国肩肘外科医师协会(ASES)评分、Rowe 评分及运动/娱乐活动水平。记录两组术后并发症及复发情况。

结果

A 组患者盂骨缺损平均为 22.1%±2.1%,B 组为 12.2%±3.7%。A 组术后 ASES 评分(由术前的 57.9±14.3 分提高至末次随访时的 88.9±6.2 分,P=.001)和 Rowe 评分(由术前的 42.1±15.6 分提高至末次随访时的 87.4±7.6 分,P=.001)均明显优于 B 组(ASES 评分:91.5±12.7,P<.001;Rowe 评分:89.3±12.4,P=.01)。A 组术后复发 5 例(15.6%),B 组复发 7 例(5.4%),两组间差异有统计学意义(P=.05)。A 组中有 84.4%的患者能恢复至术前的运动/娱乐水平。

结论

盂肱前不稳伴盂骨缺损>20%的年轻患者行关节镜下稳定术可获得满意的临床疗效和复发率,但结果逊于盂骨缺损<20%的患者。关节镜下稳定术可作为盂骨缺损较大的盂肱前不稳的首选治疗方法,以恢复肩关节功能和重返术前运动娱乐水平。

文献出处

关鹏飞,李众利,柴伟,等. 盂肱前不稳伴盂骨缺损>20%的关节镜下稳定术治疗[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2022,10(4):270-276.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验